Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Iain R. Learmonth"
* Package name: txi2p
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : str4d
* URL : https://github.com/str4d/txi2p
* License : Permissive
Programming Lang: Python
Description : I2P bindings for Twisted
txi2
On June 15, 2019 9:34:19 PM UTC, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>
>afaik the CI runners use k8s to schedule their work, so I think using
>the default CI stuff from gitlab requires an architecture supported by
>k8s. arm64 is supported and I know that some people cross-compiled k8s
>for mips(el?), but I doubt
Hi Chris,
On 6/15/19 12:28 AM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Adam Borowski wrote:
>
>> Thus, what would you guys say about a new distribution, "scratch"? It would
>> be a kind of extra-experimental that doesn't put its build results anywhere
>> persistent. Throwing away built .debs would be ok, keeping
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 05:01:29PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Not every commit is worth testing,
So only push when you want to test. GitLab CI tests every push, not
every commit.
> especially on bigger packages. I don't
> want to cause unnecessary drain on already limited resources (crap
> ar
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 05:04:34PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 07:29:49PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> > I care about two use cases:
> > * boxes with HDDs or SD cards
> > * datacenter VMs, buildds
> [...]
> > No, there's no such thing as a 1-way machine that can
> > in
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:28:47PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> > Thus, what would you guys say about a new distribution, "scratch"? It would
> > be a kind of extra-experimental that doesn't put its build results anywhere
> > persistent. Throwing away built .debs would be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Socrates Tzagiousis
* Package name: i3-gaps
* Version : 4.16.1
* Upstream Author : Ingo Bürk
* URL : https://github.com/Airblader/i3
* License : (BSD-3-clause)
* Programming Lang: (C, Perl)
* Description : i3-gaps – i3 wi
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 12:17:07AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> It would be awesome if we had resources to run autopkgtests for such
> scratch builds on a variety of archs as well.
Hell yeah!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ We domesticated dogs 36000 years ago; together we chased
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ animals, hung out and licke
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 11:14:37AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Well, this is a false equivalence. I explicitly designed Ubuntu's
> -proposed to be equivalent to unstable, rather than to a new thing that
> Debian didn't have.
>
> (Albeit with some minor differences in detail: it's a partial suite
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 11:20:17AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:51:56PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Thus, what would you guys say about a new distribution, "scratch"? It would
> > be a kind of extra-experimental that doesn't put its build results anywhere
> > persis
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:51:56PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Thus, what would you guys say about a new distribution, "scratch"? It would
> be a kind of extra-experimental that doesn't put its build results anywhere
> persistent. Throwing away built .debs would be ok, keeping just logs.
I thi
11 matches
Mail list logo
