Re: Removing bzip2 support from apt due to rustification

2019-06-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 09:03:18PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > This isn't just for us; it's also for the upstreams involved. It can be > demoralizing and frustrating to be pulled into negative discussions about > something you care about, and people have limited capacity to react > gracefully to

Re: Removing bzip2 support from apt due to rustification

2019-06-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Paul Wise writes: > On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 10:09 AM Russ Allbery wrote: >> Please let us have internal conversations without using them to >> prematurely pick fights with external maintainers. > It definitely wasn't my intention to pick a fight. Yeah, I didn't think that part was intentional si

Re: Removing bzip2 support from apt due to rustification

2019-06-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 10:09 AM Russ Allbery wrote: > Please let us have internal conversations without using them to > prematurely pick fights with external maintainers. It definitely wasn't my intention to pick a fight. I strongly disagree with hiding upstream problems from upstream developers

Re: Removing bzip2 support from apt due to rustification

2019-06-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Paul Wise writes: > That was me. I apologise for the confusion I generated. I get annoyed at > people who don't CC the right people when sending mail. In this case I > probably should have sent you Federico direct mail pointing at the > archives instead. This is called snitch-tagging in other fo

Re: Removing bzip2 support from apt due to rustification

2019-06-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 4:48 AM Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 03:36:08PM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 11:48 +0800, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > > Why am I getting BCCed on this? Is this low-key unsolicited > > complaining like in https://

Re: Question about Debian build infrastructure

2019-06-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 6. Juni 2019 um 20:33 Uhr schrieb Kyle Edwards : > > Hello all, > > I have been preparing Ubuntu releases for CMake on our own APT > repository for several months now. We did this by preparing our own > repository infrastructure - we have a machine that builds packages, and > a machine that

Re: Suspending Offer to Reimburse Expenses for Attending Future Bug Squashing Parties

2019-06-07 Thread Holger Levsen
btw, i'd also be in favor of raising this to 100 Euro or British Pounds or Swiss Francs, or whatever the currency is, where 90-110 $something has the most value. contributions are our highest value. -- tschau, Holger

Re: Suspending Offer to Reimburse Expenses for Attending Future Bug Squashing Parties

2019-06-07 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 09:19:03AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > Handling reimbursements for BSPs has significantly crossed my threshhold > for not being fun with our current procedures. We absolutely should > reimburse developers attending BSPs yes! why don't you just say 'yes' to all requests wri

Re: Removing bzip2 support from apt due to rustification

2019-06-07 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 22:48 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > I did not BCC you, someone must have bounced it to you. You might > want to look at your mail headers to see how it got to you. I don't > even know your email address (well now I do...). I hope whoever did > it will step forward. You

Re: Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 12:32:54PM -0700, James Lu wrote: > >> +1 for Materia (materia-gtk-theme), especially the dark variant. It's a > >> simple, flat dark theme that preserves contrast without being having a > >> pitch black background, more so than Arc-Dark and even Adwaita-Dark. The > >> widge

Re: Removing bzip2 support from apt due to rustification

2019-06-07 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 11:48 +0800, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Why am I getting BCCed on this? Is this low-key unsolicited complaining like in https://mastodon.social/@juliank/102226793499538013 ? > seeing that Federico Mena Quintero has taken over bzip2 development > and is in the process of po

Re: Removing bzip2 support from apt due to rustification

2019-06-07 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 09:54:01AM +0200, Xavier wrote: > Le 07/06/2019 à 09:48, Mo Zhou a écrit : > > On 2019-06-06 21:44, Boyuan Yang wrote: > >> I do remember there's still some source packages / binary packages in > >> Debian > >> using the bzip2 format. If we are going to do that (which

Re: Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 10:57:17PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Adam Borowski - 07.06.19, 21:09: > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 11:24:03AM -0700, James Lu wrote: > > > I use Noto Sans, which supports a lot of languages out of the box > > > and is the default in at least Cinnamon AFAIK. > > > >

Re: Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Adam Borowski - 07.06.19, 21:09: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 11:24:03AM -0700, James Lu wrote: […] > > > * default font is ugly and poorly hinted -- the latter is > > > especially jarring> > > > > on a low-resolution screen I'm at right now, the former still > > > applies to one's proper battles

Re: Removing bzip2 support from apt due to rustification

2019-06-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 03:36:08PM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 11:48 +0800, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Why am I getting BCCed on this? Is this low-key unsolicited > complaining like in https://mastodon.social/@juliank/102226793499538013 I did not BCC you, som

Re: Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread James Lu
On 2019-06-07 12:09 p.m., Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 11:24:03AM -0700, James Lu wrote: >> As far as I know, Debian mostly uses default upstream desktop defaults, >> so these concerns apply there too. Evidently some DEs (Plasma, Cinnamon) >> focus on looks out of the box more t

Re: DebConf19: Join our local crowdfunding campaign until June 15th

2019-06-07 Thread Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana
On 07/06/2019 18:46, Pranav Jain wrote: > Probably this one: https://www.catarse.me/debconf19 Ops, thanks :-) I had forgotten it. Best regards, -- Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana (phls) Curitiba - Brasil Debian Developer Diretor do Instituto para Conservação de Tecnologias Livres Membro da Com

Re: Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 11:24:03AM -0700, James Lu wrote: > As far as I know, Debian mostly uses default upstream desktop defaults, > so these concerns apply there too. Evidently some DEs (Plasma, Cinnamon) > focus on looks out of the box more than others. Yeah, and when upstream defaults are not

Re: Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Adam Borowski - 07.06.19, 17:24: > This is about GUI appearance and ergonomy. > > I'll concentrate at XFCE, as I consider GNOME3's UI a lost cause, thus > I'd find it hard to bring constructive arguments there. Similar to you I do not "get" GNOME 3. I have no idea why I would like to use it. But

Re: Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread Jonathan Carter
Hey Adam On 2019/06/07 17:24, Adam Borowski wrote:> I'll concentrate at XFCE I proposed most of what you said in this email (and some more) in the #debian-xfce channel a few months ago. They were actually surprisingly open to having such config changes and suggested I prepare a proposal, I was g

Re: Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Fri, 07 Jun 2019, Wookey wrote: > On 2019-06-07 17:24 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > * CSD is still a thing. No, your special program shouldn't get to ignore > > system theme, put controls in wrong order, miss some controls, not respond > > to minimize/etc if it's currently busy, etc. Co

Re: Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Bjørn Mork - 07.06.19, 19:22: > Adam Borowski writes: > > => Install gtk3-nocsd by default in all desktop tasks but Gnome. > > It's not> > > perfect but it helps. > > That's nice. Thanks for the tip. I enjoy nice tools like eog and > evince, but have always been annoyed by the miss

Re: Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread Wookey
On 2019-06-07 17:24 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > * CSD is still a thing. No, your special program shouldn't get to ignore > system theme, put controls in wrong order, miss some controls, not respond > to minimize/etc if it's currently busy, etc. Consistency not one-off > designs. What is

Re: Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread James Lu
(I *love* customization, so I can't help but chime in here...) As far as I know, Debian mostly uses default upstream desktop defaults, so these concerns apply there too. Evidently some DEs (Plasma, Cinnamon) focus on looks out of the box more than others. On 2019-06-07 8:24 a.m., Adam Borowski wr

Re: speeding up installs

2019-06-07 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 10:52:43AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Adam Borowski writes: > > > There are two massive recent improvements: > > * eatmydata helps a lot, and eating a power-lossed install is not a loss > > We did an experiment at work about four years ago with using eatmydata > inside

Re: speeding up installs

2019-06-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Adam Borowski writes: > There are two massive recent improvements: > * eatmydata helps a lot, and eating a power-lossed install is not a loss We did an experiment at work about four years ago with using eatmydata inside a D-I run, and had to revert because we ran into no end of problems with zer

speeding up installs

2019-06-07 Thread Adam Borowski
Hi! Package install times are quite nasty. For example, a full GUI install can take[1] 1.5 hours on spinning rust, and several minutes even on raid0 of Optane disks -- you can't get much faster without operating entirely in memory[2]. There are two massive recent improvements: * eatmydata helps a

Re: Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread Bjørn Mork
Adam Borowski writes: > => Install gtk3-nocsd by default in all desktop tasks but Gnome. It's not > perfect but it helps. That's nice. Thanks for the tip. I enjoy nice tools like eog and evince, but have always been annoyed by the missing window title and associated window manager cont

Re: Salsa migration from foo-guest to foo [was: Bits from the DPL (May 2019)]

2019-06-07 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Fri, 07 Jun 2019, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 6/5/19 4:08 PM, Norbert Preining wrote: > > This should be > > completely independent from what one can do on salsa. > > So I propose that whatever one's level within Debian is, it should not > > change the status on salsa. > > I also find it surpr

Re: DebConf19: Join our local crowdfunding campaign until June 15th

2019-06-07 Thread Samuel Henrique
And here's the URL for the crowdfunding: https://www.catarse.me/debconf19

DebConf19: Join our local crowdfunding campaign until June 15th

2019-06-07 Thread Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana
Hi all, Since March we are running a local crowdfunding campaign to encourage brazilians to help DebConf19 because donating to DebConf19, they feel part of the Conference. We had a good experience doing this on the last two minidebconfs. Now we translated it because maybe you would like to join it

Re: Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 17:24 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > This is about GUI appearance and ergonomy. > > I'll concentrate at XFCE, as I consider GNOME3's UI a lost cause Have you tried Cinnamon, it's quite nice and not ugly nor unwieldy. > * people tend to use computers with only limited lightin

Debian, so ugly and unwieldy!

2019-06-07 Thread Adam Borowski
This is about GUI appearance and ergonomy. I'll concentrate at XFCE, as I consider GNOME3's UI a lost cause, thus I'd find it hard to bring constructive arguments there. I also hate with a passion so-called "UX designers". Those are folks who created Windows 8's Metro tiles, lightgray-on-white "

Re: Salsa migration from foo-guest to foo [was: Bits from the DPL (May 2019)]

2019-06-07 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 6/5/19 4:08 PM, Norbert Preining wrote: > This should be > completely independent from what one can do on salsa. > So I propose that whatever one's level within Debian is, it should not > change the status on salsa. I also find it surprising that the "feature" from Alioth that one has to compl

Bug#930117: ITP: wpebackend-fdo -- WPE backend for FreeDesktop.org

2019-06-07 Thread Alberto Garcia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alberto Garcia * Package name: wpebackend-fdo Version : 1.3.0 Upstream Author : The WPE WebKit Team * URL : https://wpewebkit.org/ * License : 2-clause BSD and Expat Programming Lang: C++ Description : WPE backend

Bug#930116: ITP: libwpe -- Base library for the WPE WebKit port

2019-06-07 Thread Alberto Garcia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alberto Garcia * Package name: libwpe Version : 1.3.0 Upstream Author : The WPE WebKit Team * URL : https://wpewebkit.org/ * License : 2-clause BSD Programming Lang: C Description : Base library for the WPE WebKit

Re: Bits from the DPL (May 2019)

2019-06-07 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Thu, 06 Jun 2019, Sam Hartman wrote: > > "Bastian" == Bastian Blank writes: > > Bastian> Hi Sam > Bastian> On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 11:57:41AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > >> However, it's a lot easier to get a foo-guest account on salsa > >> than it is to get a foo guest ac

Re: ZFS in Buster

2019-06-07 Thread Philipp Kern
On 6/6/2019 8:09 PM, Aron Xu wrote: > Key interest in the thread is getting some insights about how to deal > with the awkward situation that affects ZFS experience dramatically - > Linux will remove those symbols in LTS kernel release, although > in-kernel symbols are never promised to be stable.

Re: @debian.org mail

2019-06-07 Thread Philipp Kern
On 6/6/2019 12:49 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Daniel Lange writes: > >> We have more people registered for DebConf ("the Debian Developers' >> conference") with @gmail.com than @debian.org addresses. > > You can't fix @gmail.com. It is deliberately broken for commercial > reasons, and that won't st

Re: Removing bzip2 support from apt due to rustification

2019-06-07 Thread Xavier
Le 07/06/2019 à 09:48, Mo Zhou a écrit : > Hi Boyuan, > > On 2019-06-06 21:44, Boyuan Yang wrote: >> I do remember there's still some source packages / binary packages in Debian >> using the bzip2 format. If we are going to do that (which looks reasonable, >> BTW), a serious archive-wide scan shou

Re: Removing bzip2 support from apt due to rustification

2019-06-07 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi Boyuan, On 2019-06-06 21:44, Boyuan Yang wrote: > I do remember there's still some source packages / binary packages in Debian > using the bzip2 format. If we are going to do that (which looks reasonable, > BTW), a serious archive-wide scan should be made in advance to see how great > the impac