Re: Re-evaluating architecture inclusion in unstable/experimental

2018-09-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 14:16 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: [...] > Furthermore, several of the ports are in very healthy condition and > even surpass some release architectures. The powerpc and ppc64 ports, > for example, build more packages than any of the mips* ports. I would be very ha

Re: Re-evaluating architecture inclusion in unstable/experimental

2018-09-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 9/28/18 11:26 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 14:16 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> So, it's not always a purely technical decision whether a port >> remains a release architecture. It's also often highly political and >> somehow also influenced by commercial entiti

Re: Re-evaluating architecture inclusion in unstable/experimental

2018-09-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 14:16 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > So, it's not always a purely technical decision whether a port > remains a release architecture. It's also often highly political and > somehow also influenced by commercial entities. Please don't make implications like that unl

Bug#909798: ITP: ryzomcore -- science-fantasy MMORPG engine

2018-09-28 Thread Phil Morrell
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Phil Morrell * Package name: ryzomcore Version : 3.4.0 Upstream Author : Winch Gate Property Ltd. * URL : http://www.ryzomcore.com/ * License : AGPL3+, CC-BY-SA, GPL-2 Programming Lang: C++, Lua Description : scie

Re: Re-evaluating architecture inclusion in unstable/experimental

2018-09-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hello! I just saw this mail this morning by accident while browsing the archives, I am not subscribed to debian-devel. > The ftpmaster team would like to clarify which Debian ports should and/or would like to continue to be part of Debian unstable and experimental. I'm not sure what context you

Re: epoch bump request for gnome-calculator

2018-09-28 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:50:51PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > > Yes. Precisely because there is collaboration between both sides on those > > packages. > [..] > > I agree. > > While epochs are nasty and , > having this one more doesn't really hurt anyone and makes a > maintainer's life easi

Bug#909786: ITP: node-timeago.js -- format datetime with *** time ago statement

2018-09-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-timeago.js Version : 3.0.2 Upstream Author : hustcc (http://git.hust.cc/timeago.js) * URL : https://github.com/hustcc/timeago.js#readme * License

Re: New software for Debian

2018-09-28 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 03:11:58PM +0300, Tommi Höynälänmaa wrote: > Hi > > I would like to include the following software to Debian testing or stable > distribution: You can't add anything to current stable (only to the next stable), but you can add new packages to unstable and they will then mov