Hi Ian,
On 04-05-18 12:50, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Doing as you suggest for a real test feels wrong, since it involves
> denormalising (in the relational database sense) the dependency graph.
>
> But I guess I could introduce a test which does nothing, but which has
> as direct dependencies the indi
Hi Chris,
On 04-05-18 01:35, Chris Lamb wrote:
>>> ie. 75 out of "top" 100 packages according to popcon are missing
>>> autopkgtests.
>>
>> Yes, go provide patches to add them ;) But let's make them smart.
>
> Well, you're pushing at an open door with me with the "patches
> welcome" call to arms
Hi Ian,
Can we carry this discussion over to debian...@lists.debian.org (added
in CC now)?
On 04-05-18 15:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> James Clarke writes ("Re: Dealing with ci.d.n for package regressions"):
>> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 11:55:56AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Is that documented somewh
Sorry - I was looking at the "Bug reports" link which is the binary
package, not the source package, so missed ublock-origin #877040 and
debianbuttons #870344.
There's also #866997 requesting that mozilla-devscripts provide tools
for packaging WebExtensions, which has patches.
On Sat, 05 May 2018 17:34:10 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> A lot of now defunct alioth addresses are used in the Maintainer:
> field. This makes the packages rc-buggy for an invalid address.
>
> To create awareness about that issue, also to provide suggestions on
> how to resolve this I intend
Some now defunct alioth addresses are used in the Uploaders: field.
This is not explicitly forbidden by policy but certainly something that
should be addressed.
To create awareness about that issue, also to provide suggestions on
how to resolve this I intend to do a MBF using the following message
A lot of now defunct alioth addresses are used in the Maintainer:
field. This makes the packages rc-buggy for an invalid address.
To create awareness about that issue, also to provide suggestions on
how to resolve this I intend to do a MBF using the following message:
Hello everybody,
as discussed more than two weeks ago (time passes too fast), I intend
to do a mass bug filing (MBF) against packages that use any of those
alioth list addresses in debian/control that were *not* migrated to the
alioth-lists service, and hence are now invalid.
Statistic bit: Of 10
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: libcatmandu-xls-perl
Version : 0.08
Upstream Author : Nicolas Steenlant
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Catmandu-XLS
* License : Arti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ruby-bindex
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : 2014-2017 Genadi Samokovarov
* URL : https://github.com/gsamokovarov/bindex
* License : Expat
Des
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
* Package name: braceexpand
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Stanis Trendelenburg
* URL : https://github.com/trendels/braceexpand
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Bash-style br
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ruby-bootsnap
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author : 2017 Shopify, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/Shopify/bootsnap
* License : Expat
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ruby-turbolinks-source
Version :
Upstream Author : Sam Stephenson
* URL : https://github.com/turbolinks/turbolinks-source-gem
* License : Expat
> - 2 don't mention it in the BTS (ublock-origin, debianbuttons)
Just for the record, the ublock-origin migration to webext is
underways, I simply ran out of time.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Vincent Bernat wrote:
WebExtensions are backed by a standard draft:
https://browserext.github.io/browserext/. So, situation is expected to
improve in the future.
Mozilla have explicitly said that "Extensions created with the new
standard[...]won’t break in new Firefox releases." [0]
It has pre
On 2018-05-04 21:04, Holger Levsen wrote:
> because this is what the modern web has become in 2018. go gopher go!
Modern web? I don't use Mosaic anymore! :~)
On 2018-05-04 23:22, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> W. Martin Borgert schrieb:
> > If a software is not in Debian, I just don't use it.
>
> Your call. Don't use the extensions, then.
Alternatively: Do what is possible for me, to keep the software
I like to use in Debian. (It's the same with Python mo
17 matches
Mail list logo
