Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
* Package name: python-pyfftw
Version : 10.2
Upstream Author : Henry Gomersall
* URL : http://hgomersall.github.io/pyFFTW/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : a pythonic wrapper ar
在 2018年5月4日星期五 CST 上午3:56:30，Jeremy Bicha 写道：
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 02:29:59PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> I expect nothing much different from previous ESR cycles: stretch will
> >> move
> >> to 60 after 52 goes EOL in September.
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1285 (new: 22)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 162 (new: 1)
Total number of packages reque
Hi Paul,
> > ie. 75 out of "top" 100 packages according to popcon are missing
> > autopkgtests.
>
> Yes, go provide patches to add them ;) But let's make them smart.
Well, you're pushing at an open door with me with the "patches
welcome" call to arms :)
But is there not value to even the smalle
On 2018-05-03 23:18:44 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
> Still, this kind of setup (ie: patch proposal and review through a
> review system) was super nice, and I wish we could generalize it by
> plugging Salsa to something like this.
[...]
I agree, it's really nice (I'm probably biased
On 05/02/2018 02:02 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> And it is for those same reasons that libvirt and openstack are not
> good alternatives. No-one wants `sbuild-update -udcar unstable' to
> have to involve a libvirt driver for sbuild chroots.
Well, it all depends. If one has to setup an OpenStack deplo
Hi Chris,
On 03-05-18 20:13, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Secondly, I was just wondering if you are collecting statistics
> over what percentage of packages have autopkgtests, or, perhaps
> more usefully which special/important packages have such tests?
https://ci.debian.net/status/ has a bit. Regarding i
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 10:38:45PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > 4. Can we have a way to trigger tests from updates of non-direct
> > rdepends ? At some point in the future maybe we will run tests of
> > whole batches of updates and then have some algorithm to chop out
> > what the failures are ca
Hi Ian,
On 03-05-18 14:12, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
Skipped two point that Niels already covered.
> 3. "Required age increased by 10 days because of autopkgtest"
> seems to appear when either (i) when there are tests that should be
> run but which haven't completed and (ii) when some tests newly fai
Hi Colin, Ian,
On 03-05-18 14:19, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Colin Watson writes ("Re: autopkgtest results influencing migration from
> unstable to testing"):
>> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 07:14:16AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> In my perception, the biggest reason is a social one. The is resistance
>>>
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 02:29:59PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> I expect nothing much different from previous ESR cycles: stretch will move
>> to 60 after 52 goes EOL in September.
>
> That's really, really out of what would be reasonable f
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 02:29:59PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On 05/03/2018 02:09 PM, Julien Aubin wrote:
> > Firefox 60esr is due for next week.
> >
> > As of now Debian Stretch is bound to Firefox ESR 52 which reaches EOL
> > soon. The problem is that it becomes less and less usable as more
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: networking-bagpipe
Version : 8.0.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/networking-bagpipe
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Descrip
Hi Paul,
> And finally, thanks to all the people that helped and contributed to
> make this possible, 5 years after the initial announcement⁷.
First, thank you for pushing this!
Secondly, I was just wondering if you are collecting statistics
over what percentage of packages have autopkgtests, or
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: networking-bgpvpn
Version : 8.0.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/networking-bgpvpn
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Descripti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: jbi...@debian.org
Package Name: bolt
Version: 0.3
Upstream Authors: Christian Kellner, Red Hat
License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: C
Homepage: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/bolt/bolt
Description: system daemon t
Ian Jackson:
> Paul Gevers writes ("Dealing with ci.d.n for package regressions"):
>> As I just announced on d-d-a¹, we have enabled autopkgtest usage for
>> unstable-to-testing migration.
>
> This is great.
>
> I have some suggestions/observations, looking particularly at
> https://release.deb
Package: wnpp
Owner: Hilko Bengen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gobuster
Version : 1.4.1
Upstream Author : OJ Reeves
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/OJ/gobuster
* License : Go
Description : Directory/file & DNS busting tool written in Go
The packaging wo
On 2018-05-03 14:09:51 +0200 (+0200), Julien Aubin wrote:
> As of now Debian Stretch is bound to Firefox ESR 52 which reaches
> EOL soon. The problem is that it becomes less and less usable as
> more and more extensions are becoming incompatible with it.
>
> On the other hand team mozilla.debian.n
On 03/05/2018 09:51, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03.05.2018 09:03, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> On 03/05/2018 08:43, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
>>> On 03.05.2018 07:29, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Hi,
FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
>>> I didn't file any, an
El jue., 3 de may. de 2018 a la(s) 11:06, Julien Aubin <
julien.au...@gmail.com> escribió:
>
>
> Le jeu. 3 mai 2018 à 14:41, eamanu15 a écrit :
>
>> Hello Julien,
>>
>> Maybe this question need to be made on debian-metors or
>> pkg-mozilla-maintainer list.
>>
>> I think will be good wait until EO
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 02:29:59PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On 05/03/2018 02:09 PM, Julien Aubin wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Firefox 60esr is due for next week.
> >
> > As of now Debian Stretch is bound to Firefox ESR 52 which reaches EOL
> > soon. The problem is that it becomes less and less usa
Hello Julien,
Maybe this question need to be made on debian-metors or
pkg-mozilla-maintainer list.
I think will be good wait until EOL before change to 60. I think that the
first months of 60ers will be a little unstable.
Regards!
El jue., 3 de may. de 2018 a la(s) 10:30, Julien Cristau <
jcr
On 05/03/2018 02:09 PM, Julien Aubin wrote:
Hi
Firefox 60esr is due for next week.
As of now Debian Stretch is bound to Firefox ESR 52 which reaches EOL
soon. The problem is that it becomes less and less usable as more and
more extensions are becoming incompatible with it.
On the other hand te
Hi
Firefox 60esr is due for next week.
As of now Debian Stretch is bound to Firefox ESR 52 which reaches EOL
soon. The problem is that it becomes less and less usable as more and
more extensions are becoming incompatible with it.
On the other hand team mozilla.debian.net clearly states that Fire
Colin Watson writes ("Re: autopkgtest results influencing migration from
unstable to testing"):
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 07:14:16AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > In my perception, the biggest reason is a social one. The is resistance
> > to the fact that issues with autopkgtests out of one's cont
Paul Gevers writes ("Re: autopkgtest results influencing migration from
unstable to testing"):
> On 03-05-18 04:32, Simon Quigley wrote:
> > opinion, passing autopkgtests should be a release migration requirement,
> > and not just with my Ubuntu hat on (because it has a correlation to
> > higher q
Paul Gevers writes ("Dealing with ci.d.n for package regressions"):
> As I just announced on d-d-a¹, we have enabled autopkgtest usage for
> unstable-to-testing migration.
This is great.
I have some suggestions/observations, looking particularly at
https://release.debian.org/britney/update_excu
Paul Gevers writes ("autopkgtest results influencing migration from unstable to
testing"):
> tl;dr: migration from unstable to testing is influenced by the results
> of autopkgtest tests of your own package as well as those of your
> reverse dependencies.
AWESOME
Thank you to everone who worked
On 3 May 2018 at 11:21, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> (I echo Simon's thanks for doing this, though!)
>
Yeah, thanks for this!
I would say, yeah, please wait a couple of stable releases before
going full blocker.
I (and others) may not have the time to polish our autopkgtest tests.
If we end with les
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 07:14:16AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 03-05-18 04:32, Simon Quigley wrote:
> > What is the reasoning for not making these blocking sooner? In my honest
> > opinion, passing autopkgtests should be a release migration requirement,
> > and not just with my Ubuntu hat on (be
On 03.05.2018 09:03, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> On 03/05/2018 08:43, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> On 03.05.2018 07:29, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
>> I didn't file any, and I didn't see any being filed. Which ones do you mea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: ruby-marcel
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : 2017 Tom Ward
* URL : https://github.com/basecamp/marcel
* License : Expat
Description : Simp
On 03/05/2018 08:43, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03.05.2018 07:29, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
> I didn't file any, and I didn't see any being filed. Which ones do you mean?
They were filed by Lucas Nussbaum, e.g. #897518, #89
Chow Loong Jin [2018-05-03 12:27 +0800]:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:23:56AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > [...]
> > Frankly, I don't see the point in writing this kind of software. Sbuild
> > works super well with the overlay backend, and already has throw-able
> > chroots in tmpfs. Adding doc
35 matches
Mail list logo
