On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 04:24:59PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'd be more comfortable with this (well, RFC 5322 at this point), since
> this removes a lot of the insanity. However, note that this is
> incompatible with existing Maintainer fields: RFC 5322 requires that . be
> quoted. So any Mai
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 15:07:56 +0900,
Andreas Tille wrote:
> So please all members of Natural Language Processing, Japanese team
> update the maintainer field to some working e-mail address where the
> name does not contain any ','. The affected source packages are:
>
> udd=# select distinct source
Michael Stone writes:
> Yes, it would probably be best to specify a restricted subset of
> RFC822. Luckily most of the work for that was done in RFC2822, and it
> would probably be sufficient to specify RFC2822 "mailbox" syntax with no
> "obsolete" elements. Multiple mailboxes can be listed with
Hi all,
Cc: debian-devel
The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building
packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for your
effort making this happening jrtc27 :) The buildd is now soon up-to-
date building packages being outdated. As you know GNU/Hurd packages
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:56:46AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
I don't know if in practice the various implementations are "close
enough" for the purposes of the maintainer/uploader fields in the
control file. However, there is a high likelihood that enough of them
are different enough to be
On 20 April 2018 at 15:46, Marvin Renich wrote:
> Package: base-files
> Version: 10.1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Stephan Seitz [180420 07:38]:
>> On Do, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:00:37 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
>> > But being human I prefer names over numbers, even if it's just for
>> > aesthetic re
* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [180420 11:00]:
> On 20/04/18 16:46, Marvin Renich wrote:
> > I would also like /etc/debian_version to contain both number and name,
> > but I suspect there is some resistance to this on the grounds that
> > scripts may be using $(cat /etc/debian_version) for comparisons.
Marvin,
> I have often wanted to have on my system a text file containing the
> correspondence between code name and release number.
This appears to be already in the archive in a number of places.
For example, in `debdate`, `debian-handbook` or even in the `debian-
timeline` package if you spea
On 20/04/18 16:46, Marvin Renich wrote:
> I would also like /etc/debian_version to contain both number and name,
> but I suspect there is some resistance to this on the grounds that
> scripts may be using $(cat /etc/debian_version) for comparisons.
> Perhaps /etc/debian_codename? Since debian_vers
Package: base-files
Version: 10.1
Severity: wishlist
* Stephan Seitz [180420 07:38]:
> On Do, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:00:37 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > But being human I prefer names over numbers, even if it's just for
> > aesthetic reason - "buster" is just more comfortable than "debian10".
>
Hello,
Dimitri John Ledkov (2018-04-20):
> From my point of view, this is confusing... cause I regard myself as
> being part of the installer team myself.
>
> I guess you are advocating for general code review, more than two
> pairs of eyes on things?
There were no mails on debian-boot@, so tha
On 18 April 2018 at 08:18, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 18/04/18 01:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> That's another perfect example why udeb additions should get reviewed:
>> we would have noticed another buggy package, and its bugginess might not
>> have been copied over to another package.
>
On 18 April 2018 at 00:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dimitri John Ledkov (2018-04-17):
>> First, I apologize for not responding to this email earlier, as I have
>> missed it in my mailbox.
>
> It's a mail from hours ago, so there's no apology needed.
>
>> Secondly, my work has been blocked
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Comma in Maintainer field"):
> > I am opposed to this on the grounds that there are two types of RFC822
> > parsers in the world: correct ones that will drive you insane if you
> > attempt to understand them, a
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Comma in Maintainer field"):
> I am opposed to this on the grounds that there are two types of RFC822
> parsers in the world: correct ones that will drive you insane if you
> attempt to understand them, and incorrect ones. Nearly all of them are in
> the latter bucket.
>
On Do, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:00:37 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
But being human I prefer names over numbers, even if it's just for
aesthetic reason - "buster" is just more comfortable than "debian10".
No, it’s not. I know that my systems are running Debian 8 or 9, but
I always have to think if s
On 2018-04-19 23:00, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Philipp Kern wrote...
Turns out that this is a terrible idea.
Because?
People will start to rely on names for sorting again. Regardless if it's
the right thing technically people are people and will use what tools
they have available.
We should
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Raphaël Hertzog
* Package name: oca-core
Version : 11.0
Upstream Author : Odoo's Community Association
http://odoo-community.org/
* URL : https://github.com/OCA/OCB
* License : LGPLv3
Programming Lan
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:24:48AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > However, keep in mind I would certainly not agree to that since it's a
> > terrible hack, creates a precedent I wouldn't want to see, and mostly:
> > There's another option, ask the a
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:24:48AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > > On the other hand I fully agree doing dozens or hundreds of uploads just
> > > because an address out of my control became invalid is a
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:24:48AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > On the other hand I fully agree doing dozens or hundreds of uploads just
> > because an address out of my control became invalid is a huge waste of
> > ressources that are better spent
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> On the other hand I fully agree doing dozens or hundreds of uploads just
> because an address out of my control became invalid is a huge waste of
> ressources that are better spent elsewhere. However, that's why
> alioth-lists was created.
We have
22 matches
Mail list logo
