On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:43:58PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Put a mapping into a git repository that DDs can push to? Make sure that
> > it is fast-forwarded always? Then let people deal with it?
> I am currently working on such a mapping.
I appr
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 07:18:57PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 05:57:21PM +, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > So we need to decide what we want. I think there probably is consensus
> > about:
> >
> > - We want people with non-free hardware to install Debian if they want to
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:43:58PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Put a mapping into a git repository that DDs can push to? Make sure that
> > it is fast-forwarded always? Then let people deal with it?
> I am currently working on such a mapping.
Thanks a lot
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 12:32 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> You are right. It is just not easy to solve this, because this
> information must be available on Debian systems. So it would be
> something in parallel to downloaded Packages files, right? And
> who generates this file(?) based on whic
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> > On Dec 29, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> >
> > > Please propose a solution for reusing the name without breaking renamed
> > > and
> > > not yet migrated repos.
> > Ignore the renamed repositories: if somebo
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 29, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>
> > Please propose a solution for reusing the name without breaking renamed and
> > not yet migrated repos.
> Ignore the renamed repositories: if somebody renamed them then they
> obviously expected to have to update
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 12/29/2017 12:51 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Dec 29, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> >> Please propose a solution for reusing the name without breaking renamed and
> >> not yet migrated repos.
> > Ignore the renamed repositories: if somebody renamed them
Control: block 885722 by -1
Package: wnpp
Owner: Hilko Bengen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: node-pause-stream
Version : 0.0.11
Upstream Author : Dominic Tarr
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/dominictarr/pause-stream
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScr
Control: block 885722 by -1
Package: wnpp
Owner: Hilko Bengen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: node-from
Version : 0.1.7
Upstream Author : Dominic Tarr
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/dominictarr/from#readme
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Desc
Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:16:01PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
>> "Whatever". My main point is imho to both make it easier for people to
>> run Debian on their computers and educate them at the same time.
> My point is you shouldn't educate with lies and half-truths.
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 05:57:21PM +, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > they will most likely simply not understand the point, and what makes
> > > free hardware so much better.
> >
> > > massively encourage users to use non-free hardware
> >
> > > link to a page suggesting free hardware over simi
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 05:57:21PM +, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> So we need to decide what we want. I think there probably is consensus about:
>
> - We want people with non-free hardware to install Debian if they want to.
> - We want people with non-free firmware installed to get updates for it.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 10:13:52AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 11:00:38PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > they will most likely simply not understand the point, and what makes
> > free hardware so much better.
>
> > massively encourage users to use non-free hardware
On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 12:32 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2017-12-29 12:42, Paul Wise wrote:
> > This is just a symptom of a Debian design flaw that dates back to
> > before we started using VCSen for packaging. We include information in
> > the source package that can change independently o
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:56:25PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > My point is you shouldn't educate with lies and half-truths.
> Good point. Then you get to do it the correct way. Deal?
That's not how these things work though.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:11:29PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/28/2017 02:33 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
> > wrote:
> >> If the idea is *not* to move those to @lists.d.o, I cannot see what we
> >> should be using instead.
> >>
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:22:23PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> My point is you shouldn't educate with lies and half-truths.
Good point. Then you get to do it the correct way. Deal?
Cheers,
--Toni++
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Manas kashyap
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-json-buffer
Version : 3.0.0
Upstream Author : Dominic Tarr (
http://dominictarr.c$
* URL : https://github.com/dominictarr/json-buffer
* License
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:06:17PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > > This is just a symptom of a Debian design flaw that dates back to
> > > before we started using VCSen for packaging. We include information in
> > > the source package that can chang
On 12/28/2017 02:33 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
> wrote:
>> If the idea is *not* to move those to @lists.d.o, I cannot see what we
>> should be using instead.
>>
>> Any recommendation?
>
> Someone on your team should create a Tracker Te
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Manas kashyap
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-p-is-promise
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus (sindresorhus.com
)
* URL : https://github.com/sindresorhus/p-is-promise#readme
* Licens
Control: block 884833 by -1
Package: wnpp
Owner: Hilko Bengen
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: node-event-stream
Version : 3.3.4
Upstream Author : Dominic Tarr
* URL or Web page : http://github.com/dopminictarr/event-stream
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScrip
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-sleep-promise
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Jan Brummelte
(http://jan-brummelte.de)
* URL : https://github.com/brummelte/sleep-promise
* Licens
On 12/29/2017 12:51 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 29, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> Please propose a solution for reusing the name without breaking renamed and
>> not yet migrated repos.
> Ignore the renamed repositories: if somebody renamed them then they
> obviously expected to have to update th
On Dec 29, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Please propose a solution for reusing the name without breaking renamed and
> not yet migrated repos.
Ignore the renamed repositories: if somebody renamed them then they
obviously expected to have to update the VCS URLs anyway.
Switch the anonscm name when ali
On 2017-12-29 12:42, Paul Wise wrote:
> This is just a symptom of a Debian design flaw that dates back to
> before we started using VCSen for packaging. We include information in
> the source package that can change independently of the source package
> (such as Vcs-*, Homepage, debian/watch, Maint
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:16:01PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > > link to a page suggesting free hardware over similar non-free hardware
> >
> > There is no such thing. There is only non-free hardware without updates
> > for its software.
>
> "Whatever". My main point is imho to both make it ea
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 10:13:52AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 11:00:38PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > link to a page suggesting free hardware over similar non-free hardware
>
> There is no such thing. There is only non-free hardware without updates
> for its softw
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:42:28PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >
> > > I'm also growing some URL switching fatigue when it comes to Debian's
> > > git repos. And that's one of the re
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:42:28PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> > I'm also growing some URL switching fatigue when it comes to Debian's
> > git repos. And that's one of the reasons I moved all my packaging to
> > my own server some
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-promise-retry
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : IndigoUnited
(http://indigounited.com)
* URL :
https://github.com/IndigoUnited/node-promise-retry#r
]] Pali Rohár
> What do you think about moving pktsetup into own binary package? Users
> who do not need packet writing configuration and only need tools for UDF
> filesystem would install only udftools package.
udftools is a tiny package, splitting it seems a bit meaningless.
> But such thing
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 27 2017, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I think what would be ideal is having it disabled by default. People
> can turn it on again for their non-packaging repos.
>
> Upstream's bug tracker suggests GitLab can do this[1] so I've filed a
> request.[2]
... which has now been fulfilled.
33 matches
Mail list logo
