Package: wnpp
Owner: Hubert Chathi
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libjs-browser-request
Version : 0.3.3
Upstream Author : Jason Smith
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/jhs/browser-request
* License : Apache License 2.0
Description : Browser library compatibl
Package: wnpp
Owner: Balint Reczey
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: intel-me-cleaner
Version : 1.0+git20171022.g2ff65c1
Upstream Author : Nicola Corna
* URL : https://github.com/corna/me_cleaner
* License : GPL-3.0
On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 01:43:13AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> maildrop source tree can be build with different build option to produce
> maildrop program in 2 ways for each arch.
>
> * set GID mail without restricted caller (maildrop)
> * set UID root with restricted caller for courier-mta
>
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 at 01:43:13 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Of course we can build 2 source packages to do this. But is there any
> easy clean way to do [two builds with different options] without making
> 2 source packages with identical upstream tarball.
>
> Any pointer to a simple example which
Hi,
maildrop source tree can be build with different build option to produce
maildrop program in 2 ways for each arch.
* set GID mail without restricted caller (maildrop)
* set UID root with restricted caller for courier-mta
(maildrop-courier) -- This is now missing in archive but we used to
Hi, thanks folks
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 01:24:08PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, December 18, 2017 02:39:20 PM James Cowgill wrote:
...
> a binary from another source package, but still don't ask for removal. Once
> getmail4 doesn't produce the current version of any binaries anymo
Hi,
Just a heads up: The debhelper compat level 11 is now stable and
available in stretch-backports.
Thanks,
~Niels
Hi Vincent,
> Unrelated, but I am developing some kind of "lintian fatigue". […]
> Sometimes Lintian is right, sometimes it's not.
As you imply, static analysis tools need to maintain a healthy signal-
to-noise ratio for them to remain relevant and useful.
Needless to say, if Lintian is generati
On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> All I'm saying, is that copyright holder information / author list is
> mandatory if the license mandates it. The case of an anonymous author
> shows we've accepted software in Debian without a copyright holder.
Software with an anonymous a
Quoting Thomas Goirand (2017-12-24 11:28:06)
> This is a very interesting discussion, it's IMO important to have it.
> On 12/23/2017 02:45 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> The only thing we really need is to make sure about the license of
>>> the software. Having a copyright holder name is only *he
Hi Jonas,
This is a very interesting discussion, it's IMO important to have it.
On 12/23/2017 02:45 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> The only thing we really need is to make sure about the license of the
>> software. Having a copyright holder name is only *helping* to make
>> sure that we are ind
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sean Whitton
* Package name: clojure-mode
Version : 5.6.1
Upstream Author : Jeffrey Chu, Lennart Staflin, Phil Hagelberg,
Bozhidar Batsov and Artur Malabarba
* URL : https://github.com/clojure-emacs/clojure-mo
12 matches
Mail list logo
