Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andy Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: ocaml-rope
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Christophe Troestler
* URL : http://rope.forge.ocamlcore.org/
* License : LGPL-2.1 with linking exception
On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 20:44:08 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > for the armel port in buster the question of raising the baseline came up.
> > That has been a recurring question over the time, the reason to
> > maintain ARMv4t instruction set was OpenMoko mobile phone, which lot
> > of people was usi
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 07:45:35PM +, Wookey wrote:
>...
> I'm very happy if people mark problematic packages that no longer
> build for armv5 as 'notforus' if no-one steps up to fix them in a
> timely fashion, but killing the architecture because some upstreams
> no-longer care about v5 seems
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Sinclair
* Package name: boost-numeric-bindings
Version : 0.99
Upstream Author : Kresimir Fresl et. al.
* URL : https://github.com/uBLAS/numeric_bindings
* License : Boost Software License - Version 1.0
Programm
On 2017-11-07 11:48 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2017-11-07 11:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Keeping armel on life support for 2 more
> > years is a significant drain on DSA and our hosters, for questionable
> > benefit.
>
> I agree, that this support comes not for free, but the benefit
>
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 11:08:39AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> That's not clear to me at all. Keeping armel on life support for 2 more
> years is a significant drain on DSA and our hosters,
>...
What kind of significant drain exactly?
AFAIK so far noone has stated that it would be safe to
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 01:43:50PM +0100, Héctor Orón Martínez wrote:
>...
> 2017-11-05 22:32 GMT+01:00 Adrian Bunk :
>
> > for the armel port in buster the question of raising the baseline came up.
>
> That has been a recurring question over the time, the reason to
> maintain ARMv4t instruction
W dniu 07.11.2017 o 14:11, Thomas Goirand pisze:
> On 11/05/2017 10:32 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> 20 years ago you could go into a shop and buy a mobile phone
>> with a CPU supported by the armel port in stretch.
> I didn't know Stretch was released 20 years ago. :)
Stretch maybe not. But ARMv4t w
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:00:42PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> It would be great -- I tried to make an unofficial Jessie release for x32,
> but doing the equivalent of Britney turned out to be too hard. The main
> reason was binNMUs: any out-of-archive binNMU conflicts with official
> binNMUs th
Package: wnpp
Owner: Lev Lamberov
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: eshell-bookmark
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Matúš Goljer
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/Fuco1/eshell-bookmark
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp
Description : integrate
On 11/05/2017 10:32 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 20 years ago you could go into a shop and buy a mobile phone
> with a CPU supported by the armel port in stretch.
I didn't know Stretch was released 20 years ago. :)
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 01:43:50PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
>
>Also build daemons are aging, those were initially donated by Marvell
>(some development boards) which then they replaced with other
>development boards. We have been unable to find suitable hardware to
>build armel port and current AR
>>>[+debian-embedded, feel free to adjust CC'd mailing lists on reply]
Hello,
Thanks for bringing up this discussion! And apologies for adding
more complexity to the initial question.
Find few comments inlined below,
2017-11-05 22:32 GMT+01:00 Adrian Bunk :
> for the armel port in buster th
Quoting "W. Martin Borgert" :
There is still relevant hardware
around which can run "armel", but not "armhf".
Forgot to mention some, that one can still buy:
On https://www.taskit.de/stamp-overview.html the three boards
named "9261", "9G20", and "9G45". AFAIK.
Also Raspberry Pi Zero, if I'm n
On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 02:49 -0800, Rick Thomas wrote:
> How do I know if a machine is ARMv4t? I have a sheevaplug and a
> couple of openrd machines (one “client”, the other “ultimate”) that
> are still doing useful work. Are they v4t?
They're ARMv5 (so still need armel). I too have similar devic
> On Nov 7, 2017, at 3:27 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 2017-11-07 11:49, schrieb Rick Thomas:
>> How do I know if a machine is ARMv4t? I have a sheevaplug and a
>> couple of openrd machines (one “client”, the other “ultimate”) that
>> are still doing useful work. Are they v4t?
>
Hi,
Am 2017-11-07 11:49, schrieb Rick Thomas:
How do I know if a machine is ARMv4t? I have a sheevaplug and a
couple of openrd machines (one “client”, the other “ultimate”) that
are still doing useful work. Are they v4t?
cat /proc/cpuinfo should do the trick. It might not show the 't'
after
How do I know if a machine is ARMv4t? I have a sheevaplug and a couple of
openrd machines (one “client”, the other “ultimate”) that are still doing
useful work. Are they v4t?
Thanks,
Rick
> On Nov 5, 2017, at 1:32 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> for the armel port in buster the question
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 11:16:41AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I think a possible solution is the plan we had inside Debian Ports which is
> to introduce a Britney instance within Debian Ports and hence be able to
> provide a Debian testing release.
>
> My dream would be to not to ha
On 2017-11-07 11:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Keeping armel on life support for 2 more
> years is a significant drain on DSA and our hosters, for questionable
> benefit.
I agree, that this support comes not for free, but the benefit
is not questionable to me: There is still relevant hardware
around
On 11/07/2017 11:08 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
That's not clear to me at all. Keeping armel on life support for 2 more
years is a significant drain on DSA and our hosters, for questionable
benefit.
I think a possible solution is the plan we had inside Debian Ports which is
to introduce a Britne
On 11/05/2017 10:32 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for the armel port in buster the question of raising the baseline came up.
>
> 20 years ago you could go into a shop and buy a mobile phone
> with a CPU supported by the armel port in stretch.
>
> Roger Shimizu is doing a great job on ARMv5 ha
Hi,
On 07/11/2017 09:38, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 11/06/2017 09:56 AM, b...@coldsource.net wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I work for UFC - Que Choisir (a French consumer association) and we just
>> released (GPL3) version 2.0 of our job scheduler evQueue.
>>
>> Here is the website : http://www.ev
On 11/06/2017 09:56 AM, b...@coldsource.net wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I work for UFC - Que Choisir (a French consumer association) and we just
> released (GPL3) version 2.0 of our job scheduler evQueue.
>
> Here is the website : http://www.evqueue.net/
>
> We are providing debian packages (debia
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Tryton Maintainers
* Package name: tryton-modules-account-eu
Version : 4.6.0
Upstream Author : Tryton project (www.tryton.org)
* URL : http://downloads.tryton.org/4.6/
* License
25 matches
Mail list logo
