On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:48:50PM +0200, Chris Lamb wrote:
>...
> However, based on an informal survey at DebConf (and to reflect the
> feeling towards software reproducibility in the free software community
> in general) unless there are strong objections I intend to raise the
> severity of these
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:41:21PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 24 août 2015 22:30 +0100, Colin Tuckley :
>
> >> We have pushed other archive-wide goals that were not shared by
> >> all upstreams. For example, we have enabled hardening build flags
> >> on almost all packages and for packages
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andy Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: ocaml-result
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Jane Street Group, LLC
* URL : https://github.com/janestreet/result
* License : BSD 3-clause
Programmi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andy Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: ocaml-migrate-parsetree
Version : 1.0.4
Upstream Author : Frédéric Bour and Jérémie
Dimino
* URL : https://github.com/ocaml-ppx/ocaml-migrate-parsetree
* Li
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1116 (new: 16)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 157 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reque
Dear release team,
I would appreciate some attention for https://bugs.debian.org/868558
- I filed it on July 16.
- I followed up on July 29.
- I followed up on August 6.
- I answered a question on August 10.
- I followed up on August 19.
- I answered a question on August 26, and followed up on A
Am 31.08.2017 um 18:53 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin:
[...]
>> Well there is of course a nuclear option. I don't have the effort for
>> this, but, the nuclear option for trad Debian menu supporters would be
>> to:
>>
>> * Package xdg-menu-convert but provide it with a mechanism that allows
>> a men
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:33:12PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> structures. Any transition plan which did that based on xdg files
> would be quite horrible because it would involve mixing, in a single
> file, data maintained by the trad Debian menu folks with data
> maintained by the XDG folks.
ITY
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes ("Re: Debian Policy 4.0.1.0 released"):
> One "proper transition plan" has been proposed, and there was no
> visible result in almost two years; it's certainly sad
> that`xdg-menu` (from Arch, see [1]) has not been packaged; nor did
> our very own `menu` [2] receive enou
Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Maintainer information in source packages (was: Re:
Returning to the requirement that Uploaders: contain humans)"):
> as a more radical change one could also ask the question where to
> maintain the maintainer information. Currently we handle this in the
> source package
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:16:36AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> python-digitalocean, ruby-azure*, waagent, twittering-mode,
> probably HBCI clients, python3-googleapi,
> python3-pyicloud, python-yowsup, youtube-dl,
> libgfbgraph-0.2-dev
Thank you for this list. I removed servers that cannot r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Apollon Oikonomopoulos
* Package name: h2o
Version : 2.2.2
Upstream Author : DeNA Co., Ltd., Kazuho Oku
* URL : https://h2o.examp1e.net
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : Optimized HTTP/1.x, HTTP/2
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:15:01AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> Adding a 'firmware' repository (and even enabling it by default), while
> it would similarly both improve that out-of-the-box experience and make
> the free-software bubble easier to achieve for those who want it, would
> not remove th
"Dr. Bas Wijnen" writes:
> Actually, that isn't so clear at all. At least when it comes to current
> practice, I have yet to find any client for which nobody wrote a free server.
> People keep implying that we have many such clients currently in main, but I
> don't think we do. So there is no cl
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:15:01AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2017-08-28 at 07:59, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > I think if someone wants to write a client with the purpose of
> > interacting with a non-free service, that client should go in contrib
> > and there is nothing wrong with that. I fin
15 matches
Mail list logo
