Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Reinhard Tartler
* Package name: whatthepatch
Version : 0.0.5
Upstream Author : Christopher S. Corley
* URL : https://github.com/cscorley/whatthepatch
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Library
On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 15:58 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2017-08-30 15:54 GMT+02:00 Dimitri John Ledkov :
> > I hope that this email alone is enough for at least some maintainers
> > to integrate/schedule this change without the bug overhead
>
> I think this could be a good candidates for a lint
On 8/30/17, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 08:43:30AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:52 AM, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 09:19:23PM +0200, Anon Andme wrote:
>> >> Please stop sending emails to this address. I did not subscribe to
at bottom :-
On 30/08/2017, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:26:55PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>> I was under the impression that due to rpm brokeness Debian and
>> thereafter dpkg came into being.
>
> This is entirely wrong. The first entry in dpkg's changelog was in
> 1994, a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: trepan3k
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/trepan3k
Upstream Author : Rocky Bernstein
* License : GPL3
The original version for Python 2.7 is marked on PyPI as stable.
This port for Python 3.x (by the same author) is ma
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 06:58:51PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > I hope that this email alone is enough for at least some maintainers
> > to integrate/schedule this change without the bug overhead, as this is
> > low priority.
> Can you please publish a dd-list?
Actually I should just scrol
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 02:54:59PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> I hope that this email alone is enough for at least some maintainers
> to integrate/schedule this change without the bug overhead, as this is
> low priority.
Can you please publish a dd-list?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Desc
2017-08-30 15:54 GMT+02:00 Dimitri John Ledkov :
> I hope that this email alone is enough for at least some maintainers
> to integrate/schedule this change without the bug overhead
I think this could be a good candidates for a lintian tag to inform
maintainers about the change and to keep track of
On 30 August 2017 at 14:44, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> upstart - event-based init daemon has been removed from debian and is
>> currently only present in oldstable.
>>
>> Many packages however still ship upstart integration. Pleas
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> upstart - event-based init daemon has been removed from debian and is
> currently only present in oldstable.
>
> Many packages however still ship upstart integration. Please consider
> removing /etc/init/* conffiles from your p
upstart - event-based init daemon has been removed from debian and is
currently only present in oldstable.
Many packages however still ship upstart integration. Please consider
removing /etc/init/* conffiles from your packages. Do note, that
typically this will require a debian/pkg.maintscript sni
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:26:55PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> I was under the impression that due to rpm brokeness Debian and
> thereafter dpkg came into being.
This is entirely wrong. The first entry in dpkg's changelog was in
1994, and rpm's first release was in 1997.
Please spend at least
12 matches
Mail list logo
