--
*Александр Лебедев* <*downfal8*@*gmail**.com*>;<*lebed13fan*@*gmail**.**com*
>;~*|****🗝****openVPN:bgG.png**...*
***55ED6D08*.*pgp*
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: libsambox-java
Version : 1.0.34
Upstream Author : Andrea Vacondio
* URL : http://www.sejda.org
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : SAMBox PDF processor
SAMB
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: libsejda-io-java
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Andrea Vacondio
* URL : http://www.sejda.org
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : layer of Input/Output cla
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> Hi,
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 01:49:36PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:47:30AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > > Is it possible to share a link to the survey res
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 19:06 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > [ Correcting ftp-master's email address, but keeping the large list of
> > recipients for some reason. ]
>
> really… that's just a ftp-master issue IMHO, definitely not due
Matthias Klumpp wrote...
> So, lzip isn't adopted widely, that's certainly not because of Debian
> or any other Linux distribution.
The war is over, the winner is VHS.
Trying to get lzip support in wider usage is somewhat a boot-up
problem: Few people see an advantage in doing this, so it doesn'
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 16:25:37 +0200, Maria Bisen
wrote:
>2017-07-03 15:11 GMT+02:00 Matthias Klumpp :
>> So, lzip isn't adopted widely, that's certainly not because of Debian
>> or any other Linux distribution.
>
>I agree, but I thought that Debian adopting lzip could make lzip more
>widely adopted;
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-locate-character
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Rich Harris
* URL : https://gitlab.com/Rich-Harris/locate-character
* License : Expat
Prog
On Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:38:59 +0100, Thomas Pircher
wrote:
>I don't get it; what exactly is the problem when upstream distributes
>their source in multiple formats, including .xz and .lz, among others?
That the lzip community knows that the lzipped sources will almost
never be decompressed by any
On 07/03/2017 07:06 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> [ Correcting ftp-master's email address, but keeping the large list of
>> recipients for some reason. ]
>
> really… that's just a ftp-master issue IMHO, definitely not due to
> debhelp
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> [ Correcting ftp-master's email address, but keeping the large list of
> recipients for some reason. ]
really… that's just a ftp-master issue IMHO, definitely not due to
debhelper much less by pbuilder…
> Is the buildinfo actually p
[ Correcting ftp-master's email address, but keeping the large list of
recipients for some reason. ]
On 2017-07-03 16:00, Ian Jackson wrote:
Yves-Alexis Perez writes ("Bad interaction between
pbuilder/debhelper/dpkg-buildinfo/dpkg-genchanges and dak on
security-master"):
However, I recently did
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-is-reference
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Rich Harris
* URL : https://github.com/Rich-Harris/is-reference#readme
* License : Expat
Progr
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:09:00PM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
>I'm a user and a tester, not a dev, and I know nothing (and don't
>want to know anything) about the personal politics between Debian
>developers. So that's all I'll say on that subject.
>
>To Steve's original point:
>
>First, a big THAN
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 03:47:13PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>On 26/06/2017, Steve McIntyre wrote:
...
>> If our live images are going to be good enough to meet the standards
>> that Debian users deserve and expect, we need *consistent*,
>> *sustained* involvement from a lot more people. Pleas
Hi Matthias,
2017-07-03 15:11 GMT+02:00 Matthias Klumpp :
>
> So, lzip isn't adopted widely, that's certainly not because of Debian
> or any other Linux distribution.
>
I agree, but I thought that Debian adopting lzip could make lzip more
widely adopted; and that's why I started this thread. Now
Yves-Alexis Perez writes ("Bad interaction between
pbuilder/debhelper/dpkg-buildinfo/dpkg-genchanges and dak on security-master"):
> However, I recently did that for an upload targeted at stretch-security, and
> unfortunately this caused a problem on security-master, where dak couldn't
> process t
2017-07-03 14:42 GMT+02:00 Maria Bisen :
> [...]
> 4- As a result, lzip is almost never used alone (without xz), and Debian can
> justify forever the lack of lzip support
>
> You need to consider all four points to understand the issue.
No, please read again the mails previous developers wrote. Lz
Hi Thomas,
Thomas wrote:
> I don't get it; what exactly is the problem when upstream distributes
their
> source in multiple formats, including .xz and .lz, among others?
Please check again point 1 and 2. See below:
1- Somebody from Debian says: "if a lot of upstream tarballs start to be
nativel
Sorry for the fail on FTP-masters email address (which also got the mail
bounced from alioth). Replying to keep threading consistent but quoting the
whole mail below).
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 14:49 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently had a problem with an upload to the archive, lik
(adding debian-dpkg)
I think it would be worth stepping back a moment and thinking about
why we don't have declarative machinery for things like this. (And
also about why we have ucf as well as dpkg conffile prompts.)
* There is a potential difficulty with sequencing of the
install/removal-ti
Hi,
I recently had a problem with an upload to the archive, likely due to bad
interaction between the tooling I use to build packages and the archive
manager.
I usually build my packages using pbuilder, with SOURCE_ONLY_CHANGES=yes in
.pbuilderrc, so pbuilder will ask to generate a _source.change
Maria Bisen writes ("Re: Please add lzip support in the repository"):
> Moreover, software errors have already killed people:
Good grief.
This conversation is:
1. determined advocacy from an external project
2. going badly
3. not capable of leading to any productive outcome
listmaster, can yo
On 2017-07-03 11:41, Maria Bisen wrote:
3- Somebody else, also from Debian, asks the upstream above to bring
back
the xz tarball
4- As a result, lzip is almost never used alone (without xz), and
Debian can
justify forever the lack of lzip support
Hi Maria,
in the example you mentioned upst
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 09:26:31PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> As discussed in #758100, I'd like to switch to using versioned Provides
> in perl/perl-base/perl-modules-5.xx for buster. I'd be interested to
> hear if anybody knows of any remaining blockers for that.
[...]
> My current thinking wou
Hi,
Russ Allbery wrote:
>> As an user of Octave who wish to see more lzip adoption, I don't think
>> this to be fair.
> Octave's use of lzip is completely unrelated to Debian asking for xz.
> Providing xz in no way prevents Octave from also providing lzip. I think
> you are inventing a conflict
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: libsejda-injector-java
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Andrea Vacondio
* URL : https://www.sejda.com/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : lightweight depen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: libsejda-eventstudio-java
Version : 1.0.6
Upstream Author : Andrea Vacondio
* URL : https://www.sejda.com/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : pure Java even
Hello!
I'd like to draw peoples attention to
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/pre-depends-directly-on-multiarch-support.html
In short, please drop "Pre-Depends: multiarch-support" from affected
packages!
(Lintian suggests using ${misc:Pre-Depends} but that expands to empty
since a long time alrea
Sorry to disturb you but I'm a low-vision person, what is the way to
answer on HN? It seems it's no longer possible.
Best regards.
Le 01/07/2017 à 17:01, Chris Lamb a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear fellow developers,
Here's what I've been getting up to as your D
30 matches
Mail list logo
