On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 01:49:36PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:47:30AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > Is it possible to share a link to the survey results? I saw it when I
> > submitted
> > my entry, but I closed the window before my brain parsed it, so I can'
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 09:29:58 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> > Yeah, maybe apt-listbugs is a bit confused here:
> >
> > # apt-listbugs list wpasupplicant
> > Retrieving bug reports... Done
> > Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
> > grave bugs of wpasupplicant (-> )
> > b1 - #849122 - With 2.6
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 at 17:36:30 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Most packages in Debian that run autoreconf currently build-depend
> directly or indirectly on automake (version 1.14.1 in jessie, released
> 2013; version 1.15 in stretch/sid, released in 2015). However, 58
> packages in sid still buil
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:41:54AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I would imagine that any PR workflow would allow anyone to add a comment
> saying they have reviewed the changes and they look good, withing the
> same "place" where the maintainer is already looking at.
Indeed, but it would be us
On 06/19/2017 05:37 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 08:56:14AM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Sean Whitton
>> wrote:
>>> Someone might contribute a fix in the form of a PR, and an uploader of
>>> the package might review that fix and determine tha
On Monday, June 19, 2017 04:37:12 PM Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Jeremy,
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 08:56:14AM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Sean Whitton
wrote:
> > > Someone might contribute a fix in the form of a PR, and an uploader of
> > > the package might
Hello Jeremy,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 08:56:14AM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Sean Whitton
> wrote:
> > Someone might contribute a fix in the form of a PR, and an uploader of
> > the package might review that fix and determine that it should be
> > merged. They
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Steinbiss
* Package name: golang-github-gin-gonic-gin
Version : 1.1.4+git20170428.1.d5b353c-1
Upstream Author : Gin-Gonic
* URL : https://github.com/gin-gonic/gin
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Go
Descriptio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko
* Package name: convert3d
Version : 0.0.0 # inquired with upstream about versioning
Upstream Author : Paul Yushkevich
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/c3d/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:18:52AM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 08:16:43PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > Christian Seiler writes:
> >
> > > Your goal in wanting to stop people from having to deal with
> > > patch files manually is laudable, but I see
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Someone might contribute a fix in the form of a PR, and an uploader of
> the package might review that fix and determine that it should be
> merged. They then look at the master branch and decide that it should
> not go into the next upload,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes ("Re: Please add lzip support in the
repository"):
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 08:36:48PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > >...
> > > We pretty much need Debian packages to be 100% correct in the first
> > >
Hello Christian,
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 08:16:43PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Christian Seiler writes:
>
> > Your goal in wanting to stop people from having to deal with
> > patch files manually is laudable, but I see the following way
> > forward to achieve that goal:
> >
> > - Pull request
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:47:30AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Is it possible to share a link to the survey results? I saw it when I
> submitted
> my entry, but I closed the window before my brain parsed it, so I can't
> retrieve
> it without submitting the survey again, skewing the results
Thank you for doing this.
Is it possible to share a link to the survey results? I saw it when I submitted
my entry, but I closed the window before my brain parsed it, so I can't retrieve
it without submitting the survey again, skewing the results (and I don't want to
do that).
Thanks
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶
On 2017-06-19 8:51, Colin Ian King wrote:
Hi Adam,
On 18/06/17 12:14, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 08:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
What was the intent of this upload? If it was to try and get the
updated
package into the release, then a) it's (far) too late and b) it
shoul
Hi Adam,
On 18/06/17 12:14, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 08:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> What was the intent of this upload? If it was to try and get the updated
>> package into the release, then a) it's (far) too late and b) it should
>> have been discussed, not just up
17 matches
Mail list logo
