Bug#863190: ITP: el-mock-el -- tiny mock and stub framework for Emacs Lisp

2017-05-22 Thread Lev Lamberov
Package: wnpp Owner: Lev Lamberov Severity: wishlist * Package name: el-mock-el Version : 1.25.1 Upstream Author : rubikitch , Johan Andersson * URL or Web page : https://github.com/rejeep/el-mock.el * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp Description : t

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, 22 May 2017 22:20:29 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:46:59PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 09:07:52AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: >> > there's just a hundred Debian workflows to maintain a package and 200 >> > manuals for that. >> No, n

Bug#863189: ITP: ert-expectations-el -- very simple unit test framework for Emacs Lisp

2017-05-22 Thread Lev Lamberov
Package: wnpp Owner: Lev Lamberov Severity: wishlist * Package name: ert-expectations-el Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : rubikitch * URL or Web page : https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/download/ert-expectations.el * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp Descript

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-22 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Andreas, On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 09:07:53AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I think that in the mid-term (probably even in short term) you'll *save* > > developer time by switching to git, > And your thinking is based on what arguments? a.) git is a lot faster than svn on most operations, wh

Bug#863170: ITP: libayatana-appindicator -- Ayatana Application Indicators

2017-05-22 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Gabriel * Package name: libayatana-appindicator Version : 0.5.0 Upstream Author : Mike Gabriel Ted Gould Cody Russel * URL : https://github.com/ArcticaProject/libayatana-appindicato

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread James Clarke
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 05:10:26PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 03:25:38PM +0100, James Clarke wrote: > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 03:06:48PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > Excellent, this is a great start, and seeing "Michael Stapelberg" for me > > > is an >

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Sean Whitton
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 03:07:42PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Areas of work that could do with attention from people with relevant > expertise and effort: > > * Getting rid of the need to mess with the changelog. That might >involve changes to Debian changelog practice, or better tooling (e

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Sean Whitton
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 01:42:54PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Of course, dgit is yet another workflow and my understanding is that > git-buildpackage (without dgit) is far more commonly used in Debian. This isn't fair to dgit. While it does impose some minimal requirements upon git trees, it is

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:46:59PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 09:07:52AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > there's just a hundred Debian workflows to maintain a package and 200 > > manuals for that. > No, no, there are more workflows than manuals for them. For instanc

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Zlatan Todoric
On 05/22/2017 07:42 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Ian Jackson > wrote: >> Holger Levsen writes ("infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away >> from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)"): >> I would encourage anyone who has effort to work on this end o

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 09:07:52AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > there's just a hundred Debian workflows to maintain a package and 200 > manuals for that. No, no, there are more workflows than manuals for them. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Holger Levsen writes ("infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away > from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)"): > I would encourage anyone who has effort to work on this end of the > contributor experience to consider what dgit

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 03:25:38PM +0100, James Clarke wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 03:06:48PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > Excellent, this is a great start, and seeing "Michael Stapelberg" for me is > > an ^^^ > > indication of quality. emphasis on *sta

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread James Clarke
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 03:06:48PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:47:51PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Someone else already had this idea: > > > > https://people.debian.org/~stapelberg//2016/11/25/build-tools.html > > Excellent, this is a great start, and seeing "Mich

Bug#863136: ITP: sphinx-autorun -- code execution extension for Sphinx

2017-05-22 Thread Félix Sipma
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: =?utf-8?q?F=C3=A9lix_Sipma?= * Package name: sphinx-autorun Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Hugo Osvaldo Barrera * URL : https://github.com/hobarrera/sphinx-autorun/ * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.) Programm

infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Holger Levsen writes ("infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)"): > I can totally confirm this. When people ask me how to get foo fixed in Debian > and I start explaining the above, people role their eyes and point to this: Yes. > there h

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:47:51PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > Someone else already had this idea: > > https://people.debian.org/~stapelberg//2016/11/25/build-tools.html Excellent, this is a great start, and seeing "Michael Stapelberg" for me is an indication of quality. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Do you mean cdbs rather than cmake? I'm struggling to make a connection > between > dh and cmake. Yes, I do; thanks for the correction. (although it does remind me that this issue of more-than-one-way-to-do-it extends up

Bug#863134: ITP: libayatana-indicator -- Ayatana Indicators panel applets shared library

2017-05-22 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Gabriel * Package name: libayatana-indicator Version : 0.6.0 Upstream Author : Mike Gabriel Ted Gould * URL : https://github.com/ArcticaProject/libayatana-indicator * License : GPL Programming

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Sean Whitton
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:29:24AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > I often think about this problem, and I start to wonder if step 0 is to try > and > enumerate it properly. That is: I picture in my mind some kind of huge diagram > (perhaps generated from more structured data, I dunno, something

Bug#863122: ITP: lua-argparse -- feature-rich command line parser for Lua language

2017-05-22 Thread Victor Seva
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Victor Seva * Package name: lua-argparse Version : 0.5.0 Upstream Author : Peter Melnichenko * URL : https://github.com/mpeterv/argparse * License : Expat Programming Lang: Lua Description : feature-rich command l

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 22/05/17 11:29, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > I often think about this problem, and I start to wonder if step 0 is to try > and > enumerate it properly. That is: I picture in my mind some kind of huge diagram > (perhaps generated from more structured data, I dunno, something into a > graphviz) > o

Bug#863121: ITP: ayatana-ido -- Widgets and other objects used for Ayatana Indicators

2017-05-22 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Gabriel * Package name: ayatana-ido Version : 0.4.0 Upstream Author : Mike Gabriel Canonical Ltd. * URL : https://github.com/ArcticaProject/aytana-ido * License : GPL, LGPL Programming Lang: C,

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Jonathan Dowland
I often think about this problem, and I start to wonder if step 0 is to try and enumerate it properly. That is: I picture in my mind some kind of huge diagram (perhaps generated from more structured data, I dunno, something into a graphviz) of a landscape of debian developer tools, grouped by some

infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

2017-05-22 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 07:52:34AM +, Riku Voipio wrote: > Right now, if you have a minor change - such fixing Homepage: or typo on > definition, it's not as straitforward as submitting a pull request. And > it gets much worse if you want to patch against upstream or build a new > upstream vers

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

2017-05-22 Thread Riku Voipio
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 01:56:17PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > If (and only if) there would be some momentum for a move to Git neither > I nor any other member of the Debian Med team will block this. But for > the moment I keep on failing to see an advantage only out of the fact > that "it is po

Find out about your late relative

2017-05-22 Thread Lea John
Dear debian-devel@lists.debian.org, I received your file from Mr. Maurice Moreau a genealogical surveys. It's about an estate of your late relative I would like us to discuss about it. Regards. John Lea.