发自我的 iPhone
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 09:01:13PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:40:34AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 08:37:59PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:48:33AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > > > >
Le 23/04/2017 à 19:48, Josh Triplett a écrit :
> Evgeni Golov wrote:
>> My gut feeling is that droping the file to /usr/lib and allowing the admin
>> to override it later via /etc. And then load it in postinst.
>
> That seems like exactly the right approach, and yes, you should put it
> in /usr/li
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:40:34AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 08:37:59PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:48:33AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > > > But this does not account for the fact that this specific tunable may b
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 12:16:58PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> Ohai,
>
> LXC recently got a bug (#860974) that is best fixed by bumping a certain
> sysctl limit above the default.
>
> However I could not find any documented policy how to do this (if at all).
>
> Both, procps and systemd support
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 08:37:59PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:48:33AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > > But this does not account for the fact that this specific tunable may be
> > > already overriden in another sysctl.d file and the package woul
Hi Josh,
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:48:33AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > LXC recently got a bug (#860974) that is best fixed by bumping a certain
> > sysctl limit above the default.
>
> Note that in addition to going this route, you might consider talking with the
> kerne
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> 1. read current levels (using sysctl, not directly).
>
> 2. if they are above the default, don't change the state of the system:
>if your config file is there, let ucf handle its update normally. if
>your config file is *NOT* there, assume deleted and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: bdist-nsi
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : Amorilia
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/bdist_nsi
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Pytho
Evgeni Golov wrote:
> LXC recently got a bug (#860974) that is best fixed by bumping a certain
> sysctl limit above the default.
Note that in addition to going this route, you might consider talking with the
kernel maintainers about increasing the default limit, or potentially even
getting the lim
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 09:08:45AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2017, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > Both, procps and systemd support (/usr)?/lib/sysctl.d/*.conf, however only
> > one package (systemd-coredump) uses it, all others drop files in
> > /etc/sysctl.d.
>
> Please
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> Both, procps and systemd support (/usr)?/lib/sysctl.d/*.conf, however only
> one package (systemd-coredump) uses it, all others drop files in
> /etc/sysctl.d.
Please drop it in /etc, debhelper/dh should mark it as conffile and
everything will work.
Alter
Ohai,
LXC recently got a bug (#860974) that is best fixed by bumping a certain
sysctl limit above the default.
However I could not find any documented policy how to do this (if at all).
Both, procps and systemd support (/usr)?/lib/sysctl.d/*.conf, however only
one package (systemd-coredump) uses
13 matches
Mail list logo
