On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 01:52:29AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Installing debhelper (+dependencies) takes about 5s here (on a 6 year
> >> old laptop with SSD+eatmydata). Most of that time seems to be spent in
> >> man-db's postinst.
> >
> > For pbuilder/cowbuilder I'm using
> > https://anonsc
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:09:37PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 24.03.2017 um 13:46 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> > Hi!
> > Thought I'd share a trick I'm using: as debhelper's dependencies chain
> > became
> > really fat, you can gain a drastic speed-up (especially for small packages)
> > by preins
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:52:29 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> Installing debhelper (+dependencies) takes about 5s here (on a 6 year
> >> old laptop with SSD+eatmydata). Most of that time seems to be spent in
> >> man-db's postinst.
> > For pbuilder/cowbuilder I'm using
> > https://anonscm.debian.o
Am 25.03.2017 um 01:17 schrieb gregor herrmann:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 23:09:37 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Installing debhelper (+dependencies) takes about 5s here (on a 6 year
>> old laptop with SSD+eatmydata). Most of that time seems to be spent in
>> man-db's postinst.
>
> For pbuilder/cowb
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 23:09:37 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Installing debhelper (+dependencies) takes about 5s here (on a 6 year
> old laptop with SSD+eatmydata). Most of that time seems to be spent in
> man-db's postinst.
For pbuilder/cowbuilder I'm using
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-perl
Am 24.03.2017 um 23:09 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Installing debhelper (+dependencies) takes about 5s here (on a 6 year
> old laptop with SSD+eatmydata). Most of that time seems to be spent in
> man-db's postinst.
> # time apt install -y debhelper
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building depende
Am 24.03.2017 um 13:46 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> Hi!
> Thought I'd share a trick I'm using: as debhelper's dependencies chain became
> really fat, you can gain a drastic speed-up (especially for small packages)
> by preinstalling debhelper into your base sbuild/pbuilder/etc image.
Installing debhel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: ro...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-urlgrey
Version : 0.4.4
Upstream Author : Gregg Caines
* URL : https://github.com/cainus/urlgrey#readme
* License : BSD-2-Clause
Programmi
Hi,
Quoting Timo Weingärtner (2017-03-24 16:56:51)
> These apt settings keep my systems clean and I guess they would also help
> build chroots:
>
> Apt::AutoRemove::RecommendsImportant "false";
> Apt::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant "false";
> Apt::Install-Recommends "false";
> Apt::Install-Sugges
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 04:18:10PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> No idea about official buildds, but I remember hearing somewhere that the
> Reproducible Builds project recreates them from scratch once a month.
The official buildds recreate their chroots twice a week.
Reproducible Builds buildds r
2017-03-24 16:18:10 CET Adam Borowski:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 07:30:55PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:25:59PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > autoremove will still usually catch this.
> >
> > I'm not sure about this. Looks like it keeps Recommends or somethi
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:51:25AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Can the imminent Stretch release be upgraded to include 4.8.19, or can the
> fix for 3758 be backported?
>
> This is the annoying bug 4.8.18 has:
> http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/3758
Start with reporting this bug at our BTS.
Can the imminent Stretch release be upgraded to include 4.8.19, or can the fix
for 3758 be backported?
This is the annoying bug 4.8.18 has:
http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/3758
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 04:18:10PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> The man page recommends -udcar, which includes autoclean, and, important
> here, autoremove.
I wonder why clean+autoclean (also both are only interesting when you keep
a separate /var/cache/apt/archives)
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 07:30:55PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:25:59PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > autoremove will still usually catch this.
> I'm not sure about this. Looks like it keeps Recommends or something. Or
> it's a bug.
I'd say that apt autoremove ke
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:25:59PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> autoremove will still usually catch this.
I'm not sure about this. Looks like it keeps Recommends or something. Or
it's a bug.
> you do refresh your chroots from time to time (don't you?);
No, I didn't even think it's ever needed unt
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:49:52PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Thought I'd share a trick I'm using: as debhelper's dependencies chain
> > became
> > really fat, you can gain a drastic speed-up (especially for small packages)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sophie Brun
* Package name: wifiphisher
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : sophron
* URL : http://wifiphisher.org/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Automated phishing attacks against Wi-Fi ne
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Thought I'd share a trick I'm using: as debhelper's dependencies chain became
> really fat, you can gain a drastic speed-up (especially for small packages)
> by preinstalling debhelper into your base sbuild/pbuilder/etc image.
What if
Hi!
Thought I'd share a trick I'm using: as debhelper's dependencies chain became
really fat, you can gain a drastic speed-up (especially for small packages)
by preinstalling debhelper into your base sbuild/pbuilder/etc image.
With debian/compat now mandatory, there's no benefit in testing this
bu
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 04:50:38AM -0700, Jose R R wrote:
>> First I modify debian/rules, option: --enable-fb
>>
---
* Sean Whitton:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:14:35AM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>> It is also useless for someone who will install Chromium from the
>> Software app (gnome-software) included in 'gnome-core' since the
>> Software app does not display debconf prompts.
>
> Do you know if this is a mi
22 matches
Mail list logo
