On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 08:45 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> What would be the best way to trigger on mirror pushes?
I'm not sure about that, please ask #debian-mirrors
or failing that #debian-admin, and or the lists.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 07:45:54AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 14516 March 1977, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > I've now written and submitted all of these patches.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Lets give it some time for them to get into packages and then we add
> sections. Please ping again, so it doesnt get
On Sun, 2017-01-22 at 13:54:26 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 22.01.2017 12:34, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > afaik people are criticizing that there are still (only) md5sum files in
> > /var/lib/dpkg/info. As dpkg --verify uses them, it might indeed make
> > sense to replace them.
> > (yes, dpkg is no
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:33 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 01/22/2017 04:31 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>> Hope things will improve soon.
>
> Thanks. We're working hard on it :).
Thanks for your effort on porting stuff!
>> However, I still cannot understand why the package questioned [0
On 01/22/2017 04:31 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Hope things will improve soon.
Thanks. We're working hard on it :).
> However, I still cannot understand why the package questioned [0]
> didn't start to build for 1+ month.
> I uploaded another package yesterday [1], now all arch are built well.
>
Dear Adrian,
Thanks for your detailed backgroud info!
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:37 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> Hi Roger!
>
> On 01/19/2017 06:27 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>> My package src:fxlinuxprint [0] didn't start to build for 1+ month.
>> While other package build seems fine (don
On 22.01.2017 12:34, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> afaik people are criticizing that there are still (only) md5sum files in
> /var/lib/dpkg/info. As dpkg --verify uses them, it might indeed make
> sense to replace them.
> (yes, dpkg is not an IDS, but better than nothing...).
Originally the thread was ab
On 01/22/2017 10:49 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 22.01.2017 00:17, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> We really ought to do the same. I'm all for keeping sha1+sha256, but
>> please let's *completely* drop md5sums for buster.
>
> We already dropped SHA1, FWIW, so it's md5+sha256. And again, the Oracle
> ann
On 22.01.2017 00:17, Holger Levsen wrote:
> We really ought to do the same. I'm all for keeping sha1+sha256, but
> please let's *completely* drop md5sums for buster.
We already dropped SHA1, FWIW, so it's md5+sha256. And again, the Oracle
announcement was about MD5-only, so isn't relevant to the d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonathan Carter
* Package name: gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel
Version : 3
Upstream Author : Jason DeRose
* URL : https://github.com/jderose9/dash-to-panel
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Descripti
10 matches
Mail list logo