Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ravishankar Purne
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-co-with-promise
Version : 4.6.0
Upstream Author : FIX_ME upstream author
* URL : https://github.com/tj/co
* License : Expat
Programming
Le 06/01/2017 à 16:37, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes ("Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format
> problems"):
>> On 2017-01-03 16:58:21 [+], Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Looked at another way, it is trying to be a version control system,
>>> layered on top of the Debian archive.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> What now?
Clearly the answer of unattended-upgrades or not is situation
dependent and the solution should depend on who is running Debian in
what context.
Desktop users should get whatever UI is available for the particular
desktop that is i
Hi,
I'm confused...
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 09:01:51PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:30:26AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> >Ifconfig has been deprecated; you should probably use "ip a show
> >dev lo" instad of the shorter and more convenient "ifconfig lo"
On Jan 06 2017, Santiago Vila wrote:
> If we want to be the Universal OS, we can't assume that any time
> (not chosen by the user) is ok to do an upgrade.
If we want to be the Universal OS, we can't assume that users will
explicitly trigger an install of security upgrades either. Nor can we
assum
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 02:13:58PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Two months ago, Steve wrote:
> > * enable it for installation via d-i by default. At installation
> [it being unattended-upgrades]
>
> What's the status of this? I do not like this idea, it interacts
> poorly with desktops whic
On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:37:48 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think only a minority of people are actually using quilt on
> debian/patches.
I have a different impression (but no proof either of course).
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - Debian Developer https://www.debian.
Hello Nikolaus,
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 03:59:40PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Jan 05 2017, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 12:39:25PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> >> But, as far as I can tell, doing this work up-front is much easier:
> >
> > Yes, but you have to do it every
On വെള്ളി 06 ജനുവരി 2017 02:46 വൈകു, Philip Hands wrote:
> Hi Praveen,
>
> I assume that all these ITPs are prompted by your crowd-funding effort.
You assumption is wrong. It is better to ask than assume. If it were
part of the crowd funding campaign, I'd have updated the -devel thread.
The initi
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format problems"):
> ! NMUer's HEAD was here when they said `dgit push'.
> Rebase branch launderer turns each ! into an
> equivalent *.
I mean it turns each % into an equivalent *, but it work on !s too.
Ian.
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes ("Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format problems"):
> On 2017-01-03 16:58:21 [+], Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Looked at another way, it is trying to be a version control system,
> > layered on top of the Debian archive. But it is only about a quarter
> > of a VCS. Ther
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format problems"):
> Could you explain in general terms the difference between the
> interchange and packaging-only branches
See modified diagram below. Are the annotations I have added (and the
name change) any help ?
> Does the packaging-only b
Quoting Philip Hands (2017-01-06 15:48:07)
> Jonas Smedegaard writes:
>> Do I understand you correctly that you recommend that we all tell our
>> users - e.g. in release notes - something like this: "We acknowledge
>> that the Nodejs included in this release is outdated, and recommend
>> that y
Jérémy Lal writes:
> 2017-01-06 12:53 GMT+01:00 Philip Hands :
>> Jérémy Lal writes:
>>
>>> 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> No answer yet, people are busy, and the number of concerned packages
> is low (a
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Thanks for looking into this!
>
> Quoting Philip Hands (2017-01-06 12:53:10)
>> Jérémy Lal writes:
>>
>> > 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :
>> >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> >>> i really think it would be
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 00:41 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, January 06, 2017 12:29:54 AM IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> > On 01/04/2017 05:42 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > git-dpm does too, and I agree it's nice.
> >
> > here's an opposite data point:
> >
> > being forced to use git-dpm b
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 01:58:50PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > > Including access to devices (which X wants these days)?
> >
> > That's just for ancient graphics cards (ie, with no KMS/DRM support)
> > without xserver-xorg-legacy, right?
>
> logind is required for drivers using KMS and *no
Two months ago, Steve wrote:
> * enable it for installation via d-i by default. At installation
[it being unattended-upgrades]
What's the status of this? I do not like this idea, it interacts
poorly with desktops which handle upgrades via PackageKit (which
is the default) and since there are locki
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 05:21:11PM +0530, Sumedh Pendurkar wrote:
> * Package name: node-extract-zip
> * URL : https://github.com/maxogden/extract-zip
> Description : unzip a zip file into a directory using 100% pure
> gluten-free organic javascript
uhm, could you please rem
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 07:48 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 12:19:08PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > With elogind do you mean https://github.com/wingo/elogind? That
> > project doesn't look very active.
> >
> > Is there any active project trying to reimplement the login
2017-01-06 12:53 GMT+01:00 Philip Hands :
> Jérémy Lal writes:
>
>> 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :
>>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
No answer yet, people are busy, and the number of concerned packages
is low (a dozen or so), should i just r
Hi Praveen,
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:16:37AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Hi Praveen,
>
> I assume that all these ITPs are prompted by your crowd-funding effort.
>
> Today we have #850399 which plumbs new depths in that it has had both
> long and short descriptions trimmed from the body of the
Hi Phil,
Thanks for looking into this!
Quoting Philip Hands (2017-01-06 12:53:10)
> Jérémy Lal writes:
>
> > 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :
> >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >>> i really think it would be best to have nodejs 6.9 in next debian r
Jérémy Lal writes:
> 2017-01-04 10:04 GMT+01:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :
>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:54:34AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>> i really think it would be best to have nodejs 6.9 in next debian release.
>>> That version is currently in experimental and i was about to upload it
>>> to unst
Hi Praveen,
I assume that all these ITPs are prompted by your crowd-funding effort.
Today we have #850399 which plumbs new depths in that it has had both
long and short descriptions trimmed from the body of the message.
Please would you take responsibility for your packaging team by
instructing
25 matches
Mail list logo
