Re: compression support in kmod

Marco d'Itri wrote: > Do we want it or not? > And if we do, should we support gzip, XZ or both? > > From time to time some user requests enabling this feature, but since > Debian kernels do not use it I am not sure that it is a good idea to add > one or two library dependencies to kmod. Does it

compression support in kmod

Do we want it or not? And if we do, should we support gzip, XZ or both? From time to time some user requests enabling this feature, but since Debian kernels do not use it I am not sure that it is a good idea to add one or two library dependencies to kmod. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Descrip

Re: Bug#817602: olpc-xo1: Removal of debhelper compat 4

On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 23:46:20 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Ah, interesting. Then there might be hope still. thanks! > > @Andres: Please don't drop the OLPC packages. I can adopt them and > maintain them in the Sugar team (and will dust off my XO-1 laptops > collecting dust in a shelf).

Re: Bug#817602: olpc-xo1: Removal of debhelper compat 4

Thanks to Paul Wise for the heads-up. OLPC still has a software and hardware organisation (me), and is using a Debian derivative (Ubuntu) on our latest hardware (NL3), using the Debian packages of Sugar desktop. Debian should drop olpc-xo1, olpc-powerd, and olpc-kbdshim. OLPC models are XO-1, XO

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

Samuel Thibault writes ("Re: unattended-upgrades by default?"): > SZALAY Attila, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 20:54:26 +0100, wrote: > > If we replace postgresql with postfix, that is much more closer to the > > standard. And I guess, that postgresql is just a "misspelling". > > Ew. Yes, sure :) Oh! Well,

Re: Bug#849338: ITP: hxtools -- Collection of tools and scripts

On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 07:50:43PM +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > * Package name: hxtools > Upstream Author : Jan Engelhardt > * URL : http://inai.de/projects/hxtools/ > > A collection of tools and scripts that have accumulated over the years, and > each of which seems to

Re: Bug#817602: olpc-xo1: Removal of debhelper compat 4

Quoting Adam Borowski (2016-12-25 23:23:32) > On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 06:06:12PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > I'm pretty sure they haven't produced XO-1s in close to a decade, and > > > that us what my packages are for. XO-1.5 and XO-4 were never > > > supported without additional hacks.

Re: Bug#817602: olpc-xo1: Removal of debhelper compat 4

On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 06:06:12PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I'm pretty sure they haven't produced XO-1s in close to a decade, and > > that us what my packages are for. XO-1.5 and XO-4 were never > > supported without additional hacks. > > > > That said, I can orphan the packages; I ju

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

2016-12-25 19:17 GMT+01:00 Stéphane Blondon : > Le 24/12/2016 à 00:51, Russell Stuart a écrit : >> [0] I was proudly shown some production "web code" yesterday. Cutting >> edge stuff, apparently. A single file contained HTML, css, and JS. >> [...] >> >> But how could a linter process

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

SZALAY Attila, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 20:54:26 +0100, wrote: > Hi All, > > On Sun, 2016-12-25 at 08:18 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Scott Kitterman, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 01:27:58 -0500, wrote: > > > On Sunday, December 25, 2016 06:36:52 AM Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Paul van der Vlis, on Sun 25

Re: Bug#817602: olpc-xo1: Removal of debhelper compat 4

Quoting Andres Salomon (2016-12-25 06:26:43) > On December 24, 2016 7:24:00 PM PST, Paul Wise wrote: >>On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Andres Salomon wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the patch. Given that OLPC isn't really alive any more, >>> I'm thinking the OLPC packages should probably just be remov

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

Hi All, On Sun, 2016-12-25 at 08:18 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Scott Kitterman, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 01:27:58 -0500, wrote: > > On Sunday, December 25, 2016 06:36:52 AM Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Paul van der Vlis, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 01:34:15 +0100, wrote: > > > > I would like it when > > > >

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

❦ 25 décembre 2016 19:17 +0100, Stéphane Blondon  : > So, the final compiled file can be a mix of several languages but the > languages are separated in the sources. > > Sometimes yaml is transformed into HTML too; I saw that on the server side. > > Perhaps I missed something, so I'm curious to l

Bug#849343: ITP: libspecio-library-path-tiny-perl -- Path::Tiny types and coercions for Specio

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 * Package name: libspecio-library-path-tiny-perl Version : 0.04 Upstream Author : Dave Rolsky * URL : http://metacpan.org/release/Specio-Library-Path-Tiny * Licen

Bug#849341: ITP: libtext-hogan-perl -- mustache templating engine statement-for-statement cloned from hogan.js

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 * Package name: libtext-hogan-perl Version : 1.04 Upstream Author : Alex Balhatchet * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Text-Hogan * License : Artistic o

Bug#849340: ITP: libterm-table-perl -- module to format a header and rows into a table

Package: wnpp Owner: gregor herrmann Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libterm-table-perl Version : 0.004 Upstream Author : Chad Granum * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Term-Table * License

Bug#849338: ITP: hxtools -- Collection of tools and scripts

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jochen Sprickerhof * Package name: hxtools Version : 20150304 Upstream Author : Jan Engelhardt * URL : http://inai.de/projects/hxtools/ * License : GPL, LGPL, WTFPL Programming Lang: C, Perl, Bash Description : C

Re: Crowd funding campaign to package browserify in debian

Le 24/12/2016 à 00:51, Russell Stuart a écrit : > [0] I was proudly shown some production "web code" yesterday. Cutting > edge stuff, apparently. A single file contained HTML, css, and JS. > [...] > > But how could a linter process that, I asked - it was some unholy > mess of 3(?

Bug#849332: ITP: auto-resize-image -- Resizer for inline and attachment images (thunderbird)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christoph Biedl * Package name: auto-resize-image Version : 0.14.3-tb Upstream Author : TrVTrV * URL : https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/auto-resize-i

Re: Re: Question about offerin packages

> How is it better than fbless and fbreader, already in the archive? My reader has the full support of the 2.1 version of the specification, including the tables, links and other. But without styles. And unlike fbreader it written using GTK. I'll give you link to github https://github.com/Cact

Re: Question about offerin packages

On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 06:09:42PM +0300, Mihail Azarov wrote: > Hello. I wrote a book-reader for FB2 > format(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FictionBook). How is it better than fbless and fbreader, already in the archive? > Tell me, how can I offer my package in the debian official repository? If

Question about offerin packages

Hello. I wrote a book-reader for FB2 format(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FictionBook). Tell me, how can I offer my package in the debian official repository?

Bug#849325: RFH: heimdal

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Heimdal is a free implementation of Kerberos 5 that aims to be compatible with MIT Kerberos. It's just released its first major release in five years following a resurge in upstream activity. There are two maintainers in Debian (Brian May and myself), but we're qui

Re: unattended-upgrades by default?

On 25.12.2016 08:18, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Yes, but that's a data point to have in mind: blindly upgrading software > is not always without consequences. Do we actually communicate a proper way of running services on a Debian machine, with services coming from Debian packages? If so, what is it