On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 07:45:54AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 14516 March 1977, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > I've now written and submitted all of these patches.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Lets give it some time for them to get into packages and then we add
> sections. Please ping again, so it doesnt get
On 14516 March 1977, Josh Triplett wrote:
> I've now written and submitted all of these patches.
Thanks!
Lets give it some time for them to get into packages and then we add
sections. Please ping again, so it doesnt get forgotten.
--
bye, Joerg
Hi,
Something went wrong with this list. At least the following.
On 09-12-16 01:27, w...@debian.org wrote:
>GNOME (#847411), orphaned yesterday
> Bug Report URL: http://bugs.debian.org/847411
This bug is about:
gnome-btdownload, GNOME interface for 'executing' BitTorrent files
>Lin
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 03:05:21PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:36:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Josh Triplett:
> > > [Please CC me on replies.]
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Does it seem reasonable to attempt to introduce these new sections
> > > before the rel
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 23:12 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Roger Shimizu wrote...
>
> > I'm ARM porter on armel/marvell (orion5x/kirkwood).
> > Stretch will be frozen and released soon, which makes me bit depressed,
> > because it means armel will be dropped out of unstable/testing as the
> > c
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1050 (new: 53)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 151 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reque
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Diane Trout
* Package name: distributed
Version : 1.14.3
Upstream Author : Matthew Rocklin
* URL : https://distributed.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Das
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Diane Trout
* Package name: partd
Version : 0.3.6
Upstream Author : Matthew Rocklin
* URL : http://github.com/dask/partd/
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Appendable key-value stora
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Diane Trout
* Package name: locket
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Michael Williamson
* URL : http://github.com/mwilliamson/locket.py
* License : BSD-2-Clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : File-based lo
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino:
> The manpage there is provided through man2html conversion.
> ...
> The replacement of the service, which is not yet available,
> will provide the pages in, I hope, a prettier HTML format.
Today I've been playing with an idea about building better HTML
pages from POD f
package: ftp.debian.org
x-debbugs-cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
severity: wishlist
Hi,
(I'm not really using golang, so I'm not the best person to comment on the
description.)
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:36:38PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > The following might work as a description for suc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Diane Trout
* Package name: zict
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Matthew Rocklin
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/zict/0.1.0
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Mutable mapping t
Daniel Pocock wrote:
>On 08/12/16 16:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On 2016-12-08 13:08, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:41:38PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 08/12/16 13:35, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:02:20PM +0100, Daniel Po
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
> ... and there are no real requirements to
> test the current setup with new Debian releases.
You may want to subscribe to debian-services-admin, where DSA have
requested testing of services against Debian stretch:
https://lists.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Should we not have public test instances of all these things ?
If this will increase the bus factor of Debian services, that would be great.
If this will just be a time sink for the people involved, that would
be less great.
On balance, it sou
har...@a-little-linux-box.at wrote...
> While it would theoretically also be possible to file a RFA or O bug I
> currently do not consider this a good course of action: The number of QA
> packages is already very high and while adopting amavisd-milter would be
> not so much of a problem to maintai
Roger Shimizu wrote...
> I'm ARM porter on armel/marvell (orion5x/kirkwood).
> Stretch will be frozen and released soon, which makes me bit depressed,
> because it means armel will be dropped out of unstable/testing as the
> conclusion of Cape Town BoF.
Same here. My Dockstars (orion5x/kirkwood
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Diane Trout
* Package name: heapdict
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Daniel Stutzbach
* URL : http://stutzbachenterprises.com/
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : a heap with decreas
On 14515 March 1977, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> while at it, please also add a section for golang package, we have over
>> 500 in the archive already:
> I don't see any bug filed on ftp.debian.org requesting such a section.
> Could you please do so, with a short and long description of the new
> secti
On 08/12/16 16:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2016-12-08 13:08, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:41:38PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/12/16 13:35, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:02:20PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> [...]
>>>
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Diane Trout
* Package name: cloudpickle
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : PiCloud, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/cloudpipe/cloudpickle
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Extended pic
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did we get anywhere with the gitlab discussion? The PHP packaging group
> has grown quite big and I would really appreciate if we can get a
> fine-grained permissions on packaging repositories.
>
> At minimum, there's split between main PHP, PECL
On Thursday, 8 December 2016 18:17:23 CET gregor herrmann wrote:
> Ah, I see; that makes sense. So, perl6 X::Y::Z modules will use the
>
> > naming perl6-x-y-z?
>
> Yup, that's my understanding.
Yes, that's the plan.
> > In any case, I don't have any objections to a new section; I just wanted
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 09:01:47 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > No. perl5 modules named FOO::BAR are packages as libFOO-BAR-perl, and
> > in this case we have perl5 modules named Perl6::Something, so this
> > naming just follows the Debian Perl Policy, even if it looks a bit
> > strange.
> > Perl6 pa
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:55:37PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 08:44:15 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > While you are in there, there is #816693, also I'm unsure (and offline
> > > atm) how many perl6 packages we currently have.
> > As far as I can tell, we have 2 such pac
Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 03:05:21PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > If anyone has any objections to the creation of the two sections "rust"
> > and "javascript", please speak up now, as I plan to start writing
> > patches for various tools to recognize these sections.
>
> whi
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 08:44:15 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > While you are in there, there is #816693, also I'm unsure (and offline
> > atm) how many perl6 packages we currently have.
> As far as I can tell, we have 2 such packages: perl6 and perl6-panda.
See my other mail.
> We have several pac
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 07:46:23AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 14515 March 1977, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >> Longer version: I think we should patch the tools first and /if/ we are
> >> in time before the release, we can add the sections. To my knowledge,
> >> there are basically no ill effects
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 07:46:23 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> While you are in there, there is #816693, also I'm unsure (and offline
> atm) how many perl6 packages we currently have.
TTBOMK we currently have
- perl6 (metapackage depending directly/indirectly on:)
- rakudo, moarvm, nqp (the 3 togethe
On 2016-12-08 13:08, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:41:38PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 08/12/16 13:35, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:02:20PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
[...]
I don't think that clearly addresses the case of alternative
dep
Hi,
did we get anywhere with the gitlab discussion? The PHP packaging group
has grown quite big and I would really appreciate if we can get a
fine-grained permissions on packaging repositories.
At minimum, there's split between main PHP, PECL extensions and PECL
modules, so something like gitlab
Dear Ian,
I just thought I could give my 2c to this idea (which I like and share).
On 28 November 2016 at 13:04, Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Should we not have public test instances of all these things ?
Yes.
> I suggest we should declare (perhaps as a DEP?) a systematic scheme
> which recommends to
On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 20:19 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Dear Steve,
>
> Thanks for your comments!
> Very informative!
>
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >
> > There are kernel helpers available to provide some atomic support, but
> > they'll be very slow compared t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-to-absolute-glob
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Jon Schlinkert (https://github.com/jonschlinkert)
* URL : https://github.com/jonschlinkert/to-abs
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:41:38PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> On 08/12/16 13:35, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:02:20PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
[...]
>
> I don't think that clearly addresses the case of alternative dependencies.
>
> My packages do not "requi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-orchestrator
Version : 0.3.8
Upstream Author : Rob Richardson (http://robrich.org/)
* URL : https://github.com/robrich/orchestrator
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-duplexify
Version : 3.5.0
Upstream Author : Mathias Buus
* URL : https://github.com/mafintosh/duplexify
* License : Expat
Programming Lang
On 08/12/16 13:35, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:02:20PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I have two packages that depend on: nagios3 | icinga
>>
>> nagios3 is being removed[1], but icinga[2] is still available, so
>> why can't my packages continue to list nagios3 as a pos
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:02:20PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I have two packages that depend on: nagios3 | icinga
>
> nagios3 is being removed[1], but icinga[2] is still available, so why
> can't my packages continue to list nagios3 as a possible dependency for
> the convenience of those peopl
On 08/12/16 13:22, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 08/12/16 13:02, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I have two packages that depend on: nagios3 | icinga
>>
>> nagios3 is being removed[1], but icinga[2] is still available, so why
>> can't my packages continue to list nagios3 as a possible dependency for
On 08/12/16 13:02, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I have two packages that depend on: nagios3 | icinga
>
> nagios3 is being removed[1], but icinga[2] is still available, so why
> can't my packages continue to list nagios3 as a possible dependency for
> the convenience of those people who continue to use i
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 03:05:21PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> If anyone has any objections to the creation of the two sections "rust"
> and "javascript", please speak up now, as I plan to start writing
> patches for various tools to recognize these sections.
while at it, please also add a secti
I have two packages that depend on: nagios3 | icinga
nagios3 is being removed[1], but icinga[2] is still available, so why
can't my packages continue to list nagios3 as a possible dependency for
the convenience of those people who continue to use it?
Regards,
Daniel
1. https://packages.qa.
Dear Steve,
Thanks for your comments!
Very informative!
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> There are kernel helpers available to provide some atomic support, but
> they'll be very slow compared to real hardware support at this level.
Are those kernel helper already reach
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 at 07:55:33 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> [0] for services that currently run via cron, it would be interesting to
> transition to running them using systemd service + timer, so that it's
> easy to run the service manually in the same environment when run
> manually (systemctl
45 matches
Mail list logo
