Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-bash-match
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Jon Schlinkert (https://github.com/jonschlinkert)
* URL : https://github.com/jonschlinkert/bash-match
*
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-micromatch
Version : 2.3.11
Upstream Author : Jon Schlinkert (https://github.com/jonschlinkert)
* URL : https://github.com/jonschlinkert/micromatch
On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 05:41:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > It's worth noting that TSX is broken in 'Haswell' processors and is
> > > supposed to be disabled via a microcode update. I don
�8C�C1`A8v84�AE{B1
\0Ae6Cv84u28b37 debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
b11NEClE8a0FR30�0C`A8v84u35[50�AENF6^10b37QE0N4E]F2~CF�85�C7[83v84g81�50002O60SEF�FDeE0lD5SD1�01b16NCEsB0W28e36R30m88`6Fv84NFBO55eF6R3B002
pB9QFB�D9�CCfF4eB0`A8v84^10b37
http://mimg.126.net/hxm/mail/edm/20141116/banner.jpg"; useMap=#Map border=0>
NB2r31v84 debian-devel@lists.debian.org `A8Y7D�1A
b11NEClE8a0FR30�0C`A8v84b40g09O20Q65v84e36NF6{B1N2DeE0lD5O20�12R30`A8v84e36NF6{B1�0CVE0N3A`A8v84^10b37]F2�AB�3Bk62SMTP/
POPg0DRA1V68
�8C�C1`A8v84�AE{B1
\0Ae6Cv84u28b37 debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
b11NEClE8a0FR30�0C`A8v84u35[50�AENF6^10b37QE0N4E]F2~CF�85�C7[83v84g81�50002O60SEF�FDeE0lD5SD1�01b16NCEsB0W28e36R30m88`6Fv84NFBO55eF6R3B002
pB9QFB�D9�CCfF4eB0`A8v84^10b37
http://mimg.126.net/hxm/mail/edm/20141116/banner.jpg"; useMap=#Map border=0>
NB2r31v84 debian-devel@lists.debian.org `A8Y7D�1A
b11NEClE8a0FR30�0C`A8v84b40g09O20Q65v84e36NF6{B1N2DeE0lD5O20�12R30`A8v84e36NF6{B1�0CVE0N3A`A8v84^10b37]F2�AB�3Bk62SMTP/
POPg0DRA1V68
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon McVittie
Package name: vectis
Version : (unreleased, not ready for wide use yet)
Upstream Author : Simon McVittie
URL : https://git.pseudorandom.co.uk/vectis.git
https://github.com/smcv/vectis
License
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
> Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> From:
> Date: To: Eliran Mesika
> Cc: Sytse Sijbrandij
> Subject: Y0uHave-W0n-Leo!_
>
> CONGRATULATION!
>
> you_have_won_a_DISH_DVR_Technology - Most_advanced_receiver_in_the_industry
> just_submit_t
Christian Seiler writes ("Re: More 5 november in the release schedule"):
> If a stable release is going to happen, there needs to be some
> kind of process so that one may converge on a stable result.
> What happens if you only have a single deadline to freeze
> fully? Immediately before that deadl
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:04:39AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]
> > And what should we do about Debian stretch, then?
>
> I believe a good start would be to add an assert() in a test version of
> glibc and then run all the autopkgtest scripts on the packages in
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:02:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes ("Re: libc recently more aggressive about
> pthread locks in stable ?"):
> > And what should we do about Debian stretch, then?
>
> Perhaps we could add the assert you suggest, on non-lock-elision
> h
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Ender
* Package name: fizmo-remglk
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Christoph Ender
* URL : https://fizmo.spellbreaker.org
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Remglk-Frontend to the fizmo
On 2016-11-06 01:12, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2016, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Looking at the code, I think that gs in jessie is plainly violating
> > the rules about the use of pthread locks. On my partner's machine,
>
> Per logs from message #15 on bug #842796:
> https://
[Jeff Epler]
> I believe that similar bugs have been afflicting hurd and kfreebsd
> debian ports for some time. In retrospect, it's too bad these reports
> weren't given more attention, because it could have made things better
> for Linux platforms as well. :-/
Yeah, too bad. :/
On the other ha
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 05:41:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > It's worth noting that TSX is broken in 'Haswell' processors and is
> > supposed to be disabled via a microcode update. I don't know whether
> > glibc avoids using it on the
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes ("Re: libc recently more aggressive about
pthread locks in stable ?"):
> Per logs from message #15 on bug #842796:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842796#15
>
> SIGSEGV on __lll_unlock_elision is a signature (IME with very high
> confidence)
[resending with correct Cc:]
I believe that similar bugs have been afflicting hurd and kfreebsd debian ports
for some time. In retrospect, it's too bad these reports weren't given more
attention, because it could have made things better for Linux platforms as well.
:-/
see e.g.,
https://bugs.deb
On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> It's worth noting that TSX is broken in 'Haswell' processors and is
> supposed to be disabled via a microcode update. I don't know whether
> glibc avoids using it on these processors if the microcode update is
> not applied. (Linux doesn't appear to hid
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Ender
* Package name: libglkif
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Christoph Ender
* URL : https://fizmo.spellbreaker.org
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Interface for fizmo-to-Glk conne
On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 20:32 +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 11/05/2016 08:13 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I have just been debugging a ghostscript segfault on jessie amd64.
> >
> > Looking at the code, I think that gs in jessie is plainly violating
> > the rules about the use of pthread locks.
Don’t ever use my email address again! I have reported this to the Nebraska
attorney general office
> On Nov 5, 2016, at 11:29 PM,
> wrote:
>
Cannot open this. Is this a joke or what?
Begin forwarded message:
> Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> From:
> Date: November 6, 2016 12:27:22 AM EDT
> To: Eliran Mesika
> Cc: Sytse Sijbrandij
> Subject: Y0uHave-W0n-Ernest!_
>
> CONGRATULATION!
>
> you_have_won_a_DISH_DVR_Techn
Yes please you can sent me of 60619 Chicago
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
> Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> From:
> Date: To: Eliran Mesika
> Cc: Sytse Sijbrandij
> Subject: Y0uHave-W0n-Carolyn!_
>
> CONGRATULATION!
>
> you_have_won_a_DISH_DVR_Technology - Most_
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
> Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> From:
> Date: To: Eliran Mesika
> Cc: Sytse Sijbrandij
> Subject: Y0uHave-W0n-Carolyn!_
>
> CONGRATULATION!
>
> you_have_won_a_DISH_DVR_Technology - Most_advanced_receiver_in_the_industry
> just_su
On 11/06/2016 11:59 AM, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Nov 2016 09:38:00 +, Niels Thykier
> wrote:
>> Marc Haber:
>>> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 13:46:16 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
>>> wrote:
[2017-Jan-05] Soft freeze (no new packages, no re-entry, 10-day
migrations)
>>>
>>>
Marc Haber wrote:
>On Sun, 06 Nov 2016 09:38:00 +, Niels Thykier
>wrote:
>>Marc Haber:
>>> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 13:46:16 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
>>> wrote:
[2017-Jan-05] Soft freeze (no new packages, no re-entry, 10-day
migrations)
>>>
>>> Does this really mean "on
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 11:59:34AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> That is really really bad. I really hoped back in 2015 that you were
> joking when you announced that.
It's really, really good. I was really glad that it isn't a joke.
I'm even willing to justify my opinion: Keeping testing in a state
On Sun, 06 Nov 2016 09:38:00 +, Niels Thykier
wrote:
>Marc Haber:
>> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 13:46:16 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
>> wrote:
>>> [2017-Jan-05] Soft freeze (no new packages, no re-entry, 10-day
>>> migrations)
>>
>> Does this really mean "once you're out, you'll stay
On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 13:46:16 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
> [2017-Jan-05] Soft freeze (no new packages, no re-entry, 10-day
> migrations)
Does this really mean "once you're out, you'll stay out"?
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies,
Marc Haber:
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 13:46:16 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> wrote:
>> [2017-Jan-05] Soft freeze (no new packages, no re-entry, 10-day
>> migrations)
>
> Does this really mean "once you're out, you'll stay out"?
>
> Greetings
> Marc
>
Yes.
[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]
> And what should we do about Debian stretch, then?
I believe a good start would be to add an assert() in a test version of
glibc and then run all the autopkgtest scripts on the packages in the
archive to see how widespread the problem is. It will not cover all
packa
32 matches
Mail list logo
