Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-regenerator-runtime
Version : 0.9.5
Upstream Author : Ben Newman
* URL : FIX_ME homepage
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-read-pkg
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus
(sindresorhus.com)
* URL : https://github.com/sindresorhus/read-pkg#readme
* License
Paul Wise writes:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> If upstream themselves aggregates, then this works well. (See, for
>> instance, TeX Live, which is basically an upstream aggregation of
>> independently-released packages.) That gets its own version number and
>> its own
On 2016, നവംബർ 2 2:22:00 AM IST, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
>Did you means that you plan a rebuild of package with grunt when grunt
>is released ?
At the minimum the packages I care about and currently in contrib or should be
in contrib. libjs-handlebars, libjs-fuzzaldrin-plus, jquery modules f
On 2016, നവംബർ 2 4:34:27 AM IST, m...@linux.it wrote:
>On Nov 01, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
>> Can you explain why you don't aggregate these into bigger packages,
>> for use in Debian ?
>Because the node.js ecosystem is toxic and broken in encouraging
>relasing software which embeds very specific ve
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> If upstream themselves aggregates, then this works well. (See, for
> instance, TeX Live, which is basically an upstream aggregation of
> independently-released packages.) That gets its own version number and
> its own unique existence and som
Ian Jackson writes:
> Our systems are not really set up for so many packages. They were
> designed with the assumption that a package would represent a
> substantial amount of upstream work, so that the Debian overhead is
> modest by comparison.
> Can you explain why you don't aggregate these i
Quoting Eric Cooper (2016-11-01 23:24:48)
> I see that a similarly large number of smallish libraries are getting
> packaged for golang. When I first looked into it, and maybe it's
> still the case, these were only to allow other Debian packages written
> in Go to be compiled; developers were s
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:24:10PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Nov 2016 at 18:11:27 +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> > The -dbg package is Multi-Arch same. It Depends on the packages for
> > which it provides debugging symbols, some of which are Multi-Arch:
> > allowed. Lintian complai
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 01:08:44AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > An user interested in future releases is usually…
> The typical user of Debian stable is…
*the* typical Debian user does not exist.
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Muchembled
* Package name: zc.customdoctests
Version : 1.0.1+1.gc142624-1
Upstream Author : Zope Foundation and Contributors
* URL : https://github.com/zopefoundation/zc.customdoctests
* License : Zope-2.1
Progr
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 06:28:41AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
>...
> An user interested in future releases is usually a contributor of sorts,
> thus often has "devscripts" installed.
The typical user of Debian stable is running Debian on servers,
and will become interested in a future release aft
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Muchembled
* Package name: python-btrees
Version : 4.3.1-1
Upstream Author : Zope Foundation and Contributors
* URL : https://github.com/zopefoundation/BTrees
* License : Zope-2.1
Programming Lang: Python
Desc
On Nov 01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Can you explain why you don't aggregate these into bigger packages,
> for use in Debian ?
Because the node.js ecosystem is toxic and broken in encouraging
relasing software which embeds very specific versions of lots of tiny
libraries, and because Debian is ideol
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Muchembled
* Package name: zodbpickle
Version : 0.7.0~1.gc9e09e3-1
Upstream Author : Zope Foundation and Contributors
* URL : https://github.com/zopefoundation/zodbpickle
* License : Python, Zope-2.1
Programming
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:49:52PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > If you have any problems feel free to contact us.
> >
> > - are “you” ?
>
> Yes.
or openssl-us...@openssl.org
Kurt
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:26:15PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just random thoughts…
>
> Kurt Roeckx (2016-11-01):
> > I just uploaded OpenSSL 1.1.0 to unstable. There are still many
> > packages that fail to build using OpenSSL 1.1.0. For most packages
> > it should be easy to migra
I see that a similarly large number of smallish libraries are getting
packaged for golang. When I first looked into it, and maybe it's
still the case, these were only to allow other Debian packages written
in Go to be compiled; developers were still encouraged to use the Go
package ecosystem ("go
Hi,
Just random thoughts…
Kurt Roeckx (2016-11-01):
> I just uploaded OpenSSL 1.1.0 to unstable. There are still many
> packages that fail to build using OpenSSL 1.1.0. For most packages
> it should be easy to migrate 1.1.0. The most common problems when
> going to OpenSSL 1.1.0 are:
> - configu
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:50:38PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> These are tiny packages and there seem to be lots and lots and lots of
> them.
I agree, but I'll play the devil's advocate here for a while:
> Every new source package and binary package is (or causes):
> * An entry in Sources and P
On Tue, 01 Nov 2016 at 18:11:27 +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> The -dbg package is Multi-Arch same. It Depends on the packages for
> which it provides debugging symbols, some of which are Multi-Arch:
> allowed. Lintian complains when I don't specify an architecture for
> those packages:
>
> W: gy
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 03:23:51PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> 2016-10-31 14:19 GMT+01:00 Ian Campbell :
> > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 12:17 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> >> 2016-10-31 10:38 GMT+01:00 Ian Campbell :
> >> > If possible I'd also prefer a solution which fixed qcontrol-stati
Sruthi Chandran writes ("Bug#840937: ITP: node-kind-of -- Get the native type
of a value"):
> * URL : https://github.com/jonschlinkert/kind-of
Pirate Praveen writes ("Bug#842129: ITP: node-path-type -- Check if a path is a
file, directory, or symlink"):
> * URL : https://
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 12:05:38PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>...
> Personally I think a Linux kernel tarball, without accompanying git
> history, is a GPL violation.
>...
Why would the git *history* matter for GPL compliance?
You can push from a shallow clone.
> Ian.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lucas Castro
* Package name: node-js-tokens
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Simon Lydell <>
* URL : https://github.com/lydell/js-tokens/blob/master/readme.md
* License : MIT/X
Description : Regex that tokenizes Ja
On 01/11/16 16:31, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> This package is a Go version of the LevelDB lightweight key-value database.
> It is provided as a dependency of stenographer
> (https://github.com/google/stenographer).
According to the webpage, this package is unfinished and experimental.
You are pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear David,
Le 01/11/2016 à 15:57, David Kalnischkies a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 02:43:21PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>> How do you actually use Multi-Arch: allowed? Should a dependent
>> package then specify either :same or :foreign?
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:09:56AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> That already exists (see the dpkg-source manual page), but IIRC isn't
> allowed in the archive because the ftp-masters do not want to have to
> analyse the whole history of a git repository for DFSG issues.
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Steinbiss
* Package name: golang-github-golang-leveldb
Version : 0.0~git20161002.0.64b1965-1
Upstream Author : The LevelDB-Go Authors
* URL : https://github.com/golang/leveldb
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming
On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 at 17:02:53 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The ChangeLog file in the "source" tarball of the hello package is
> generated from the git metadata.
>
> You are saying it is a bug that .git is not shipped in the source
> tarball of GNU hello?
I don't think it is, but I also can't a
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 02:43:21PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> How do you actually use Multi-Arch: allowed? Should a dependent
> package then specify either :same or :foreign? Looks
Neither is valid syntax.
What you do with these is depending on a package with the literal
architecture "same" (
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gordon Ball
* Package name: jupyter-console
Version : 5.0.0
Upstream Author : Jupyter Development Team
* URL : https://github.com/jupyter/jupyter_console
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Jupy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear all,
How do you actually use Multi-Arch: allowed? Should a dependent
package then specify either :same or :foreign? Looks
like it's not working:
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/gyoto-dbg_1.1.1-1.log
I was able to find documentation about
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: golang-github-btcsuite-fastsha256
Version : 0.0~git20160815.0.637e656
Upstream Author : Btcsuite project
* URL : https://btcsuite.github.io/
* License : BSD-3-clause, ISC
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: IOhannes m zmoelnig
* Package name: jsusfx
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Pascal Gauthier
* URL : https://github.com/asb2m10/jsusfx
* License : Apache2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Jesusonic FX - scripti
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 12:05:38PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> How exciting. So the official tarball of GNU hello is not the
> preferred form for modification!
ironically I could say "welcome to 2016"… ;)
> Personally I think a Linux kernel tarball, without accompanying git
> history, is a GPL v
Adrian Bunk writes ("Re: Rebuilds with unexpected timestamps"):
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 11:48:56PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >...
> > * Source for generated files in the tarball: should be in both git
> > and tarball, but sometimes mistakenly omitted from tarballs
> > (e.g. configure.ac,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: tendermint-go-db
Version : 0.0~git20160508.0.31fdd21-1
Upstream Author : Tendermint
* URL : https://github.com/tendermint/go-db
* License : GPL-3.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Iain R. Learmonth"
* Package name: ooniprobe-wui
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Tor Project
* URL : https://github.com/TheTorProject/ooni-wui
* License : pending
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : Web
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lev Lamberov
* Package name: expand-region-el
Version : 0.11.0
Upstream Author : Magnar Sveen
* URL : https://github.com/magnars/expand-region.el
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Emacs Lisp
Description : incr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Fritsch
* Package name: mapcode
Version : 2.5.0
Upstream Author : Stichting Mapcode Foundation (http://www.mapcode.com)
* URL : https://github.com/mapcode-foundation/mapcode-cpp
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-parse-glob
Version : 3.0.4
Upstream Author : Jon Schlinkert (https://github.com/jonschlinkert)
* URL : https://github.com/jonschlinkert/parse-glob
*
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sruthi Chandran
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-base
Version : 0.11.1
Upstream Author : Jon Schlinkert (https://github.com/jonschlinkert)
* URL : https://github.com/node-base/base
* License
On Wednesday 12 October 2016 11:09 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have been discussing browserified javascript situation in debian for
> sometime. We decided to spent one full month on packaging browserify if
> we can raise enough money via crowd funding. See
> http://igg.me/at/debian-brow
44 matches
Mail list logo
