Re: mk-build-deps cannot install particular version of Build-Depends packages

2016-08-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:29 PM, The Wanderer wrote: > In other words: the problem here is the fact that apt's priorities in > this regard are messed up. The same will happen with custom priorities set. > If there exists a dependency solution which will achieve the result > requested on the comm

Work-needing packages report for Aug 26, 2016

2016-08-25 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 882 (new: 29) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 171 (new: 2) Total number of packages reques

Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?

2016-08-25 Thread Robert Edmonds
Russ Allbery wrote: > Robert Edmonds writes: > > > However, that was two years ago. How long should we be expected to > > continue maintaining sysvinit scripts? > > My understanding of the feeling of the TC at the time is that maintainers > are expected to continue including the sysvinit scripts

Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?

2016-08-25 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 06:43:31PM -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote: > The relevant TC decision was two years ago in #746715: > > For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to support > the multiple available init systems in Debian. That includes > merging reasonable contribut

Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?

2016-08-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Robert Edmonds writes: > However, that was two years ago. How long should we be expected to > continue maintaining sysvinit scripts? My understanding of the feeling of the TC at the time is that maintainers are expected to continue including the sysvinit scripts for as long as (a reasonable numb

Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?

2016-08-25 Thread Robert Edmonds
Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:11:13AM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote: > > > I just saw the new conntrack-tools (1:1.4.4-2) package in Sid, which > > has as a change > > > > * [917beed] conntrackd: get rid of the sysvinit support > > > > and I wondered, if this is a bug (and at wha

Re: Is missing SysV-init support a bug?

2016-08-25 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:11:13AM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote: > I just saw the new conntrack-tools (1:1.4.4-2) package in Sid, which > has as a change > > * [917beed] conntrackd: get rid of the sysvinit support > > and I wondered, if this is a bug (and at what severity) or not. Yes, this is a

Is missing SysV-init support a bug?

2016-08-25 Thread Sven Hartge
Hi all! I just saw the new conntrack-tools (1:1.4.4-2) package in Sid, which has as a change * [917beed] conntrackd: get rid of the sysvinit support and I wondered, if this is a bug (and at what severity) or not. While I run all my personal computers on systemd (on Sid) and nearly all servers

Re: openssl 1.1.0

2016-08-25 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2016-08-23 20:47:08 [+0200], Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > please can someone give me a short summary for the openssl transition. > > I see a short discussion at 2016-06 here, but not with a clear > procedure. 1.1.0 has been released and has been uploaded to experimental. I plan to rebuild build-

Re: mk-build-deps cannot install particular version of Build-Depends packages

2016-08-25 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting The Wanderer (2016-08-25 15:29:27) > In other words: the problem here is the fact that apt's priorities in > this regard are messed up. > > If there exists a dependency solution which will achieve the result > requested on the command line (here, installing the lower version of the >

Re: mk-build-deps cannot install particular version of Build-Depends packages

2016-08-25 Thread The Wanderer
On 2016-08-25 at 09:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2016-08-25 10:44, Исаев Виталий wrote: > >> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), cmake, >> flatbuffers (= 1.2.0-1), > > This has nothing to do with mk-build-deps. Given this: > >> ➜ apt-cache policy flatbuffers >> flatbuffers: >> Installed: (n

Re: mk-build-deps cannot install particular version of Build-Depends packages

2016-08-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2016-08-25 10:44, Исаев Виталий wrote: Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), cmake, flatbuffers (= 1.2.0-1), This has nothing to do with mk-build-deps. Given this: ➜ apt-cache policy flatbuffers flatbuffers: Installed: (none) Candidate: 1.4.0-17 Version table: 1.4.0-17 500 500 http://repo1

ITP: rtklib -- Real Time Kinematic and other advanced GPS positioning techniques

2016-08-25 Thread gurkan
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: rtklib Version : 2.4.3beta Upstream Author : Tomoji Takasu, Jens Reimann (QT) * URL : http://gpspp.sakura.ne.jp/rtklib/rtklib.htm https://github.com/tomojitakasu/RTKLIB https://git

mk-build-deps cannot install particular version of Build-Depends packages

2016-08-25 Thread Исаев Виталий
Hello! ? I need to build a project which depends on the particular version of third-party library: ? cat debian/control Source: libhole-cpp Priority: optional Maintainer: Vitaly Isaev Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), cmake, flatbuffers (= 1.2.0-1), libboost-dev, libboost-system-de

Bug#835393: ITP: openvas-libraries -- open source vulnerability scanner and manager

2016-08-25 Thread 陳昌倬
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)" * Package name: openvas-libraries Version : 8.0.7 Upstream Author : Greenbone Networks GmbH * URL : http://www.openvas.org/ * License : GPL-2+, LGPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description : open