Re: Bug#827555: ITP: circle -- Show byte statistics as an ascii circle graph

2016-06-17 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Freitag, den 17.06.2016, 21:24 +0200 schrieb Roberto S. Galende: > ok, maybe bytes-circle... > That also means to change the name of the command,  > or could I just change the name of the package? > thanks I would suggest to also change the command name, in order to avoid conflicts with a

Unauthorized Email Access

2016-06-17 Thread Email Team
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. - Your E-mail account was accessed on another device in Nigeria on June 17th, 2016 08:00 PM Eastern Time. If this isn't you, click the link below and sign in from the device you always access your email from to confirm you own

Re: Bug#827555: ITP: circle -- Show byte statistics as an ascii circle graph

2016-06-17 Thread Roberto S. Galende
ok, maybe bytes-circle... That also means to change the name of the command, or could I just change the name of the package? thanks

Re: Bug#827555: ITP: circle -- Show byte statistics as an ascii circle graph

2016-06-17 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Freitag, den 17.06.2016, 19:38 +0200 schrieb Roberto S. Galende: > circle is a program that shows statistics about bytes contained > in a file as an ascci circle graph of deviations from mean in sigma > increments. sounds like a fun tool, but in the interest of keeping the package name spa

Bug#827555: ITP: circle -- Show byte statistics as an ascii circle graph

2016-06-17 Thread Roberto S. Galende
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Roberto S. Galende" Package name: circle Version : 2.2-1 Upstream Author : "Roberto S. Galende" URL : http://wp.me/p2FmmK-96 License : GPL 3 Programming Lang: C Description : Show byte statistics as an asc

Re: Problem with Google APT repo

2016-06-17 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:02:56PM +0100, Greg Stark wrote: > But as far as I can see the file I get at that URL from my browser > does in fact match the md5sum and sha1 in the package description. As > far as I can tell this either means there's a bug in APT or there's a Its a bug in APT in sofar

Re: Problem with Google APT repo

2016-06-17 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Greg Stark (2016-06-17 16:02:56) > Weird. I'm getting this: > > Err:1 http://dl.google.com/linux/talkplugin/deb stable/main amd64 > google-talkplugin amd64 5.41.3.0-1 > Hash Sum mismatch > > But as far as I can see the file I get at that URL from my browser > does in fact match the md5s

Problem with Google APT repo

2016-06-17 Thread Greg Stark
Weird. I'm getting this: Err:1 http://dl.google.com/linux/talkplugin/deb stable/main amd64 google-talkplugin amd64 5.41.3.0-1 Hash Sum mismatch But as far as I can see the file I get at that URL from my browser does in fact match the md5sum and sha1 in the package description. As far as I can t

Bug#827527: ITP: apertium-eo-fr -- Apertium translation data for the Esperanto-French pair

2016-06-17 Thread Kartik Mistry
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kartik Mistry * Package name: apertium-eo-fr Version : 0.9.0 Upstream Author : Hèctor Alòs i Font , Anthony J. Bentley , Bernard Chardonneau , Kevin Brubeck Unhammer and others. *

Re: Announcing new pkg-security team

2016-06-17 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
On 17 June 2016 at 11:06, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > If you have a pet security tool you want to see packaged/sponsored in Debian, > feel free to join the team, and ask for sponsorhip! > Hi, I'm involved in a couple of related packages [0][1] which I would be very happy to integrate in th

Announcing new pkg-security team

2016-06-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi fellow Debian Developers, as somebody has already noticed (according to the join requests in the last few days), a new team has been created by Raphaël Hertzog some weeks ago [1], and it is now starting to provide security tools [2] [3]. The main reason for this team is to provide a list of

Re: Package removal from testing for bug in stable

2016-06-17 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Eugene Zhukov , 2016-06-17, 10:31: The package is marked for autoremoval from testing, however the RC[1] bug is reported against version in stable (testing has a newer version, without a bug). How autoremoval is relevant in this case? [1] Although my question is generic, #826864 triggered t

Re: Package removal from testing for bug in stable

2016-06-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:31:51AM +0300, Eugene Zhukov wrote: > The package is marked for autoremoval from testing, however the RC[1] > bug is reported against version in stable (testing has a newer > version, without a bug). The BTS dows not know that. And if you look at the version graph[1

Package removal from testing for bug in stable

2016-06-17 Thread Eugene Zhukov
Hello, The package is marked for autoremoval from testing, however the RC[1] bug is reported against version in stable (testing has a newer version, without a bug). How autoremoval is relevant in this case? [1] Although my question is generic, #826864 triggered this question Thanks, Eugene

Bug#827509: ITP: sollya -- library for safe floating-point code development

2016-06-17 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: sollya Version : 5.0.0 Upstream Author : Christoph Lauter * URL : http://sollya.gforge.inria.fr/ * License : Cecill-C Programming Lang: C Description : library for safe floating-poin