On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Having such a reliable tracing method would give us the ability to reliably
> infer copyright information as well as generating structured build logs
> (knowing for each line in the build log the process (tree) that created it).
>
> Both o
Package: wnpp
Owner: Nick Morrott
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libmojo-pg-perl
Version : 2.27
Upstream Author : Sebastian Riedel
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Mojo-Pg
* License
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 01:37:00AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 07:44:11PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > e.g. if you have a package 1.0 and add a complete branch update as a patch
> > (or upgrade to a snapshot) one should do a 1.0+gitYYYDDMM-1 or whatever
> > forma
Hi,
2016-05-18 2:21 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover :
> On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 12:08:09 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I'm not a fan myself for turning on hardening flags in the compiler itself,
>> but if you do that, then dpkg issues like https://bugs.debian.org/823869
>> need to be addressed (whether al
Hi,
2016-05-16 13:09 GMT+02:00 Christoph Egger :
> Hi!
>
> Iustin Pop writes:
>> - that bug seems to have been opened in the context of custom patches to
>> GCC, back in 2009-2012
>> - the CTTE seems to have made an informal decision (see last update
>> #272) on that topic
>
> And most import
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 07:44:11PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> e.g. if you have a package 1.0 and add a complete branch update as a patch
> (or upgrade to a snapshot) one should do a 1.0+gitYYYDDMM-1 or whatever format
> you choose. Not 1.0-15 or so.
Here the question is "if you package unreleas
t; gcc-5 (5.3.1-21) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* GCC 5.4.0 release candidate 1.
> * Update to SVN 20160528 (r236840, 5.3.1) from the gcc-5-branch.
> - Fix PR libstdc++/69703, PR libstdc++/71038, PR libstdc++/71036,
>PR libstdc++/71037, PR libstdc++/71005,
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #825624 {Done: Marcin Kulisz } [general] general:
Raspbian not mentioned in bug categories :-(
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #825624 to the same values
previously set
> reassign -1 tracker.debian.org
Bug #825624 [general
Control: reopen -1
Control: reassign -1 tracker.debian.org
Control: severity -1 wishlist
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:57:19AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Your message dated Sat, 28 May 2016 13:24:33 +0200
> with message-id <20160528112433.GB4474@bashton004>
> and subject line
> has c
Your message dated Sat, 28 May 2016 13:24:33 +0200
with message-id <20160528112433.GB4474@bashton004>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #825624,
regarding general: Raspbian not mentioned in bug categories :-(
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libtest-needs-perl
Version : 0.002000
Upstream Author : haarg - Graham Knop (cpan:HAARG)
* URL : https://metacpan.org/rele
hello,
On 05/28/2016 12:17 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/28/2016 11:56 AM, Muri Nicanor wrote:
>> * Package name: json
>
> I would suggest maybe calling the Debian package something else,
> because 'json' is really, really generic, and while the library
> you're packaging looks
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 02:18:51AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> But seems we do not have tools to check it. Probably, we need some way
> to mark licenses of whole binary packages. WDYT?
You're correct that we have no way to document the licenses of binaries.
The Policy is currently only concerne
Control: retitle -1 ITP: nlohmann-json -- JSON for Modern C++
Hi again,
On 05/28/2016 12:48 PM, Muri Nicanor wrote:
> On 05/28/2016 12:17 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> On 05/28/2016 11:56 AM, Muri Nicanor wrote:
>>> * Package name: json
>> Since the C++ namespace is called nlohmann (see the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Muri Nicanor
* Package name: usbmon
Version :
Upstream Author : Radovan Sroka
* URL : https://github.com/radosroka/usbmon
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : commandline linux usbmon interface and
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Bugreport to Raspbian
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Checking bug categori
Hi,
On 05/28/2016 11:56 AM, Muri Nicanor wrote:
> * Package name: json
I would suggest maybe calling the Debian package something else,
because 'json' is really, really generic, and while the library
you're packaging looks extremely nice (thanks for bringing it to
my attention), I don't think
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Muri Nicanor
* Package name: json
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Niels Lohmann
* URL : https://github.com/nlohmann/json
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C++
Description : JSON for Modern C++
JSON library with
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Muri Nicanor
* Package name: quex
Version : 0.65.11
Upstream Author : Frank-Rene Schäfer
* URL : http://quex.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python, C++
Description : Quex, a lexical analyzer g
Hi,
Quoting Paul Wise (2016-05-28 06:45:44)
> I think it would be interesting to automatically track how each file
> in a binary package was created and which files they were derived
> from. Then we could automatically generate proper copyright files for
> binary packages. That is a hard project s
Quoting Dmitry Bogatov (2016-05-28 07:47:31)
>
> [add debian-devel back to cc]
>
>> Regarding _declaring_ appropriate DEP5 hints, with machine-readable
>> DEP5 = copyright format you can declare a license in the _header_
>> section to = indicate the effective license caused by "infection" of
>>
21 matches
Mail list logo
