Re: Debian i386 architecture now requires a 686-class processor

2016-05-16 Thread Drew Parsons
Gosh, that makes my eyes tear up a little.   Bye bye Pentium. D. On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 13:23 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Last year it was decided to increase the minimum CPU features for the > i386 architecture to 686-class in the stretch release cycle.  This > means dropping support for 586-c

Bug#824509: ITP: scylladb -- distributed database compatible with Apache Cassandra

2016-05-16 Thread Eric Evans
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Eric Evans * Package name: scylla Version : 1.0.3 Upstream Author : scylladb-...@googlegroups.com * URL : https://github.com/scylladb/scylla * License : AGPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : distributed databas

Re: Bug#824358: ITP: freerdp2 -- RDP client/server for Windows Terminal Services

2016-05-16 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Andreas, On Mo 16 Mai 2016 14:37:50 CEST, Andreas Henriksson wrote: Hello Mike Gabriel. Thanks for looking at packaging a newer freerdp snapshot! I have some questions and doubts below... Ok. Thanks for bringing up your questions and doubts. On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:53:07AM +0200, Mi

Re: Torrent file for netinst non-free firmware doesn't work

2016-05-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Albin Otterhäll (2016-05-15): > The torrent for the 8.4.0 64-bit netinst CD image[1] doesn't work. I > haven't tested the torrents other architecture. > > [1] > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/8.4.0/amd64/bt-cd/ Adding debian-cd@ to the loop. Ki

Re: Bug#824358: ITP: freerdp2 -- RDP client/server for Windows Terminal Services

2016-05-16 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello Mike Gabriel. Thanks for looking at packaging a newer freerdp snapshot! I have some questions and doubts below... On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:53:07AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote: [...] > * Package name: freerdp2 > Version : 2.x (Git snapshot) [...] > The new major upstream versi

reproducible builds + PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?)

2016-05-16 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 08:13:19PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: > I think the next step could be an archive rebuild with the changed defaults I assume you are talking about a test rebuild here… first, as a next step. I'm replying here now about the "real rebuilds" coming later: reproducible build