Bug#811337: ITP: ruby-minitest-shared-description -- Shared specs and shared spec subclasses for Minitest

2016-01-17 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitry Borodaenko * Package name: ruby-minitest-shared-description Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Jeremy Evans * URL : http://github.com/jeremyevans/minitest-shared_description * License : MIT Programming Lang: Ruby

Bug#811335: ITP: ruby-minitest-hooks -- Around and before/after hooks for Minitest

2016-01-17 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitry Borodaenko * Package name: ruby-minitest-hooks Version : 1.4.0 Upstream Author : Jeremy Evans * URL : http://github.com/jeremyevans/minitest-hooks * License : MIT Programming Lang: Ruby Description : Around

Bug#811299: ITP: gtabview -- simple graphical tabular data viewer

2016-01-17 Thread Yuri D'Elia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Yuri D'Elia" * Package name: gtabview Version : 0.6 Upstream Author : Yuri D'Elia * URL : https://github.com/wavexx/gtabview * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description : simple graphical tabular data v

Bug#811294: ITP: tabview -- curses command-line CSV and list (tabular data) viewer

2016-01-17 Thread Yuri D'Elia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Yuri D'Elia" * Package name: tabview Version : 1.4.1 Upstream Author : Scott Hansen * URL : https://github.com/firecat53/tabview * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description : curses command-line CSV and

Re: lirc systemd packaging (Was: Removing sysV init files)

2016-01-17 Thread Simon McVittie
On 17/01/16 11:36, Alec Leamas wrote: > On 17/01/16 03:23, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: >> A quick check of the log revealed that the service was trying to create >> a local-domain socket at |/run/lirc/lircd| . But there was no >> |/run/lirc/| directory on my system to contain that. Your syste

Bug#811275: ITP: uclibc-ng -- uClibc-ng is an implementation of the standard C library that is much smaller than glibc, which makes it useful for embedded systems.

2016-01-17 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Waldemar Brodkorb * Package name: uclibc-ng Version : 1.0.11 Upstream Author : Waldemar Brodkorb * URL : http://www.uclibc-ng.org/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C Description : uClibc-ng is an implementation

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

2016-01-17 Thread Tom H
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:53:52 +0100, Tom H wrote: >> >> Lennart didn't even say that he wanted to get rid of "EnvironmentFile=". >> >>> From the same-named thread on systemd-devel@: >> >> --- 8< --- >> 1) >> I probably should never have added E

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

2016-01-17 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 12:29:42 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ? 17 janvier 2016 11:25 +0100, Marc Haber  : >>>Of course, vlan1 is up because with networkd, configuring the "netdev" makes >>>it up while in Debian, setting the IP makes it up. However, I don't see >>>you whining about the lack of flexi

Re: Removing sysV init files

2016-01-17 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard: It didn't start because the service unit was wrong. A quick check of the log revealed that the service was trying to create a local-domain socket at |/run/lirc/lircd| . But there was no |/run/lirc/| directory on my system to contain that. Your systemd units didn'

lirc systemd packaging (Was: Removing sysV init files)

2016-01-17 Thread Alec Leamas
On 17/01/16 03:23, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: > Michael Biebl: > >> I wonder if nosh could be an option for non-linux. According to its >> website it supports native systemd service files. I have to admit >> though, I never looked at nosh myself, so I have no idea how far that >> "systemd su

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

2016-01-17 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 17 janvier 2016 11:25 +0100, Marc Haber  : >>Of course, vlan1 is up because with networkd, configuring the "netdev" makes >>it up while in Debian, setting the IP makes it up. However, I don't see >>you whining about the lack of flexibility in Debian where you cannot >>execute a command when the

Re: Communicating about the change in behaviour for ar

2016-01-17 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Manoj Srivastava: > I was trying to import the new version of make into unstable, and > I discovered that t/10 tests about the archive related part of makes > test suite failed. The reason was a change in the behaviour of ar, > which is now configured with --enable-deterministic-archives

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

2016-01-17 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:25:50 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: >Judging from man systemd.device, a .device file has something to do >with udev. A vlan device is not created by udev, it comes into >existence when a .netdev unit like > >|[1/501]mh@barrida:~$ cat /etc/systemd/network/int182.netdev >|[NetDev

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

2016-01-17 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 10:21:15 +0100 Marc Haber wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:39:02 +, Neil Williams > wrote: > >On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 09:07:56 +0100 > >Marc Haber wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:20:33 +0100, Michael Biebl > >> wrote: > >> >Amen. I'm much happier how the last coup

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

2016-01-17 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 20:24:34 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ? 16 janvier 2016 17:37 +0100, Marc Haber  : > >>>You seem to always take vague examples to avoid being contradicted. You >>>can execute any unit before and after network is setup through the >>>dependency system. >> >> Show me how to set

Re: Removing sysV init files

2016-01-17 Thread Alec Leamas
Hi! Thansk for long reply! On 17/01/16 03:23, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: Michael Biebl: I wonder if nosh could be an option for non-linux. According to its website it supports native systemd service files. This caught my eye, so I thought that I'd demonstrate. Before getting to what

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

2016-01-17 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:39:02 +, Neil Williams wrote: >On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 09:07:56 +0100 >Marc Haber wrote: > >> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:20:33 +0100, Michael Biebl >> wrote: >> >Amen. I'm much happier how the last couple of releases were handled. >> >The release team(s) did an outstanding job

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

2016-01-17 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Marc Haber > We have never done this, and we shold not do that for stretch. >From https://release.debian.org/jessie/freeze_policy.html: After the 5th of February 2015, we will not allow packages to re-enter testing if they are removed. >From https://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_

Communicating about the change in behaviour for ar

2016-01-17 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, I was trying to import the new version of make into unstable, and I discovered that t/10 tests about the archive related part of makes test suite failed. The reason was a change in the behaviour of ar, which is now configured with --enable-deterministic-archives. When adding files

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

2016-01-17 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 09:07:56 +0100 Marc Haber wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:20:33 +0100, Michael Biebl > wrote: > >Amen. I'm much happier how the last couple of releases were handled. > >The release team(s) did an outstanding job. > >And things like autoremovals are a god send. > > I am not

Re: support for merged /usr in Debian

2016-01-17 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:20:33 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >Amen. I'm much happier how the last couple of releases were handled. The >release team(s) did an outstanding job. >And things like autoremovals are a god send. I am not opposed to autoremovals. I am opposed to removing packages and not let