Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>
> > Will this eventually replace all the existing -dbg packages?
>
> That is the plan, yes.
>
> > And will this eventually become part of normal unstable/testing/etc.
> > and mirrors, or is it intended that pe
On 20 December 2015 at 22:24, Niels Thykier wrote:
| And what version of lintian is this? If you are using lintian from
| unstable or stable-backports, you shouldn't be seeing these warnings.
I see.
| I am sorry, I am not sure what you are asking. Perhaps you could tell
| me in details what y
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:24 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>> My analysis may have been premature. This may all be addressable when
>> creating a new debian/control entry. If so shouldn't the build abort when
>> there is no new debian/control entry?
>
> I am sorry, I am not sure wh
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)"
* Package name: awsshell
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : James Saryerwinnie
* URL : https://github.com/awslabs/aws-shell
* License : Apache-2
Programming Lang: python
Description : The int
Alberto Salvia Novella writes:
> I want to report a bug that affects the .deb packaging itself, so
> every single package manager is affected too.
If you have a general (as in, no specific implementable proposal) issue
with Debian package management, a bug report is inappropriate. You need
to ha
Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>
> On 20 December 2015 at 21:52, Niels Thykier wrote:
> | Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> | >
> | > Hi Niels,
> | >
> | > Thanks for the prompt and detailed answer! It addressed all my questions.
> | >
> | > On 20 December 2015 at 21:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
> | > | Dirk Eddelbuettel:
On 20 December 2015 at 21:52, Niels Thykier wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| >
| > Hi Niels,
| >
| > Thanks for the prompt and detailed answer! It addressed all my questions.
| >
| > On 20 December 2015 at 21:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
| > | Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > | > I was just updating one of my
Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>
> Hi Niels,
>
> Thanks for the prompt and detailed answer! It addressed all my questions.
>
> On 20 December 2015 at 21:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
> | Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> | > I was just updating one of my several dozen r-cran-* packages. These all
> use
> | > the same (sour
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 07:44:42PM +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> I want to report a bug that affects the .deb packaging itself, so every
> single package manager is affected too.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1528028
>
> How shall I do it?
You don't. You fix the
Hi Niels,
Thanks for the prompt and detailed answer! It addressed all my questions.
On 20 December 2015 at 21:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > I was just updating one of my several dozen r-cran-* packages. These all use
| > the same (source) r-cran.mk script shipped with the ma
Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was just updating one of my several dozen r-cran-* packages. These all use
> the same (source) r-cran.mk script shipped with the main R packages.
>
> And now all of sudden it wants to build a -dbgsym package.
>
> That may not be such a good idea for the seve
Dirk Eddelbuettel, on Sun 20 Dec 2015 13:43:38 -0600, wrote:
> That may not be such a good idea for the several hundred r-cran-* packages.
Why not?
Samuel
Hi all,
I was just updating one of my several dozen r-cran-* packages. These all use
the same (source) r-cran.mk script shipped with the main R packages.
And now all of sudden it wants to build a -dbgsym package.
That may not be such a good idea for the several hundred r-cran-* packages.
I have
I want to report a bug that affects the .deb packaging itself, so every
single package manager is affected too.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1528028
How shall I do it?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Bernd Zeimetz:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
>> So how will we deal with the migration from -dbg to -dbgsym for
>> jessie -> stretch?
>>
>> * Should we keep transitional -dbg packages around even if the
>> -dbgsym packages are in another archive?
>>
To be honest, I do not think this will make sense/work (for tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
> So how will we deal with the migration from -dbg to -dbgsym for
> jessie -> stretch?
>
> * Should we keep transitional -dbg packages around even if the
> -dbgsym packages are in another archive?
>
> * Are we going to tell people in the relea
Hi
a big thank you for all invovled implementhing this feature!
On 2015-12-19 23:26:09, Niels Thykier wrote:
> * You /can/ migrate your manual "-dbg" package to a "-dbgsym"
>- if/when it has no reverse (build-)depends.
>- it just requires you to replace "--dbg-package=pkg-dbg" with
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Steinbiss
* Package name: roary
Version : 3.5.7
Upstream Author : Andrew J. Page
* URL : http://sanger-pathogens.github.io/Roary/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : high speed stand al
Your message dated Sun, 20 Dec 2015 11:14:13 +
with message-id <56768d85.7020...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Please provide an easy and official way to get debug
symbols for all arch
has caused the Debian Bug report #508585,
regarding Please provide an easy and official way to get debug
Vincent Bernat writes:
> For experimental, would it be possible to set "Not-Automatic: yes", so
> that debug packages work in the same way than regular packages? Thanks!
This will happen with the next dinstall run.
Ansgar
Package: ntfs-3g
Version: 0.0.0+20070920-1
Severity: serious
On Dec 20, Sam Morris wrote:
> That reminds me... I wonder if anyone has looked into the legal status of
> boot_array from ntfs-3g?
>
> https://sources.debian.net/src/ntfs-3g/1:2015.3.14AR.1-1/ntfsprogs/boot.c/
There is not much to lo
On Dec 20, lucas castro wrote:
> I'll take a look at ms-sys-free.
Can you clarify which features it provides over the existing mbr
package?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Niels Thykier:
> Hi,
>
> As of today, dak supports the dbgsym packages built by debhelper and
> with debhelper/9.20151219 they are now built by default! With this, a
> decade old idea is now implemented and available for general
> consumption[1]. :)
>
> [...]
>
Hi,
We have a couple of "known
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: vim-editorconfig
Version : 0.3.3
Upstream Author : EditorConfig Team
* URL : https://github.com/editorconfig/editorconfig-vim
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Peter Spiess-Knafl"
* Package name: pkgdiff
Version : 1.7.1
Upstream Author : Andrey Ponomarenko
* URL : https://github.com/lvc/pkgdiff
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : tool for visualizing
25 matches
Mail list logo
