;)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane
* Package name: mutatormath
Version : 0.0.1~20151122
Upstream Author : Erik van Blokland
* URL : https://github.com/LettError/MutatorMath
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: cgview
Version : 0.0.20100111
Upstream Author : David S. Wishart
* URL : http://wishart.biology.ualberta.ca/cgview/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Circular Genom
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Stender
* Package name: packetbeat
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Tudor Golubenco
* URL : https://github.com/elastic/packetbeat
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : real-time networ
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 17:49 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:30:45 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > But systemd doesn't support sysvinit scripts in runlevel S, so it would
> > still be necessary to add native systemd units.
>
> What do you mean by "doesn't support"? Systemd
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:30:45 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> But systemd doesn't support sysvinit scripts in runlevel S, so it would
> still be necessary to add native systemd units.
What do you mean by "doesn't support"? Systemd in debian has a patch that
preserves ordering of runlevel S services
Hey.
One addendum on this:
I think a further reasons why we cannot really do this (i.e. remove the
dummy wrappers for fsck.btrfs and so on) is:
Nothing really guarantees that the user wouldn't set passno back to
something non-0, after all it's still a valid value.
Maybe they just auto-deploy the
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 14:18 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:49:27 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> > ❦ 27 novembre 2015 14:33 +0100, Thomas Goirand :
> >
> > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784083#40
> > > >
> > > > So I don't really get your compla
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:18:11 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:49:27 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
>> ❦ 27 novembre 2015 14:33 +0100, Thomas Goirand :
>>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784083#40
So I don't really get your complaint.
>>>
>
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:49:27 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 27 novembre 2015 14:33 +0100, Thomas Goirand :
>
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784083#40
>>>
>>> So I don't really get your complaint.
>>
>> Oh, thanks for pointing this out.
>>
>> So if I understand correctl
❦ 27 novembre 2015 14:33 +0100, Thomas Goirand :
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784083#40
>>
>> So I don't really get your complaint.
>
> Oh, thanks for pointing this out.
>
> So if I understand correctly, just adding $network to the line:
>
> # Required-Start:$local_
On 11/27/2015 11:51 AM, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thomas Goirand writes:
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789214
>
> There's a unanswered question by release
>
>> Assertions like the above aren't very convincing, sorry. Please
>> describe the issue better; I can't se
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arto Jantunen
* Package name: sqlacodegen
Version : 1.1.6
Upstream Author : Alex Grönholm
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sqlacodegen
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Automatic model co
* Thomas Goirand , 2015-11-27, 12:27:
* Package name: python-requestsexceptions
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : http://github.com/openstack-infra/requestsexceptions
This is already in Debian:
https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-reque
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-requestsexceptions
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation
* URL : http://github.com/openstack-infra/requestsexceptions
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Pyth
Hi!
Thomas Goirand writes:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789214
There's a unanswered question by release
> Assertions like the above aren't very convincing, sorry. Please
> describe the issue better; I can't see a good description of the issue
> and justification of the p
Hi,
tl;dr: We'd likt to be able to update key cloud packages in Stable, as
we consider them being just like Kernel drivers for the cloud.
Longer version:
During a discussion in the debian-cd and debian-cloud list (cross-posts
discussion), we all agreed that we would really like to have a more
li
17 matches
Mail list logo