Re: Debian is not welcome on Microsoft Azure

2015-10-17 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:54:51 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > It would be built from the linux-tools source package.  We could > cherry-pick more recent changes in tools/hv/ if necessary. Please! :) -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane

Bug#802163: ITP: libsereal-perl -- fast, compact, powerful binary (de-)serialization module wrapper

2015-10-17 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: wnpp Owner: gregor herrmann Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libsereal-perl Version : 3.005 Upstream Author : Steffen Mueller * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Sereal * License

Bug#802151: RFA: cowdancer -- pbuilder running on cowdancer

2015-10-17 Thread Iain R. Learmonth
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I recently upgraded my laptop to an SSD. I was very impressed with the new found speed I was experiencing but when I went to reinstall cowbuilder, I noticed it had fallen out of testing. I've fixed up some of the issues with the cowdancer package, the source pa

Re: Debian is not welcome on Microsoft Azure

2015-10-17 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2015-10-17 at 13:43 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Hideki Yamane: > > >  So I thinks we should care such situations, and try to improve it > >  by adding hyperv-daemons package to stable (it means for > > production > >  system). > > Sure.  The first step is to determine if we want to b

Re: Debian is not welcome on Microsoft Azure

2015-10-17 Thread Florian Weimer
* Hideki Yamane: > So I thinks we should care such situations, and try to improve it > by adding hyperv-daemons package to stable (it means for production > system). Sure. The first step is to determine if we want to build this from the kernel source package (as a new binary package), or if w

Re: Help needed talking to upstream browser developers about Debian SSO

2015-10-17 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, On 15.10.2015 22:04, Olaf Titz wrote: > Why that way? Reading an argument that the browser is "secure > infrastructure" and "audited code" makes me shudder (sorry). There is a standard for security modules, which can be dedicated hardware, or the fallback "software security module". These ha

Bug#802041: ITP: python-avro -- Python interface to Apache Avro data serialization system

2015-10-17 Thread Afif Elghraoui
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Med Packaging Team Control: block 798872 by -1 * Package name: python-avro Version : 1.7.7 Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://avro.apache.org * License : Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: Pyth