Re: version format for git snapshot

2015-09-14 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > > This is what I generally do: last release + "git" + ISO 8601 date and > time > > + 10-char substring of the commit id. I. e: > > > > 0.5+git20150531T211420-cdd9d98f2c-1 > > IME it is in fact useful to have version numbers that stand a chan

Re: version format for git snapshot

2015-09-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:46:10AM +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > > I wouldn't put the commit identifier in the package version at all. It > > isn't sortable, so clearly doesn't belong in a version string; it can be > > documented in the

Bug#799015: ITP: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error messages

2015-09-14 Thread Al Stone
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Al Stone * Package name: rasdaemon Version : 0.5.6 Upstream Author : Mauro Carvalho Chehab * URL : https://apps.fedorahosted.org/packages/rasdaemon * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description : utility to r

Bug#799011: ITP: biblesync -- multicast protocol to support Bible co-navigation

2015-09-14 Thread Unit 193
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Unit 193 * Package name: biblesync Version : 1.1.2 Upstream Author : Karl Kleinpaste * URL : https://github.com/karlkleinpaste/biblesync * License : public-domain Programming Lang: C++ Description : multicast pro

Bug#799001: ITP: python-arrayfire -- Python bindings for ArrayFire

2015-09-14 Thread Ghislain Antony Vaillant
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ghislain Antony Vaillant * Package name: python-arrayfire Version : 3.0.20140914 Upstream Author : ArrayFire Development Group * URL : https://github.com/arrayfire/arrayfire-python * License : BSD Programming Lang: Pyt

Bug#798987: ITP: django-uwsgi -- uWSGI related tools for Django

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Fladischer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Fladischer -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: django-uwsgi Version : 0.1.3 Upstream Author : Eugene MechanisM * URL : https://github.com/unbit/django-uwsgi * License : Expat Progra

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Andrey Rahmatullin , 2015-09-14, 20:42: The single thing that I found aptitude useful for is finding and removing packages that are unavailable in current debian release anymore :) Try apt-show-versions Try "apt list". -- Jakub Wilk

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-14 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 11:17:32PM +0300, Виталий Филиппов wrote: > The single thing that I found aptitude useful for is finding and removing > packages that are unavailable in current debian release anymore :) Try apt-show-versions -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-14 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Виталий Филиппов yourcmc.ru> writes: > > Try using aptitude instead of apt. It sometimes does a better job, and > I've tried and it offered me 100500 different insane ways of solving the > situation... :) that's why I don't use it, its solver seems really insane. > apt-get is far more ration

Re: version format for git snapshot

2015-09-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Pau Garcia i Quiles (2015-09-14 12:23:57) > > On Monday, September 14, 2015, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Makes perfect sense to me to add only the date for snapshot releases >> - both revision control system and commit id is irrelevant in version >> string - those belong (if at all) in c

Re: version format for git snapshot

2015-09-14 Thread The Wanderer
On 2015-09-14 at 05:04, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Pau Garcia i Quiles , 2015-09-14, 10:46: > >> 0.5+git20150531T211420-cdd9d98f2c-1~vivid~pgquiles1 > > Still shorter than > 1.31~pre0.8052aabdd159bc9050e7dc264f33782c5acce05f-1. You're not > trying hard enough. I am reminded of this entry from the fo

Re: [DH] Planning to remove deprecated commands and compat levels in debhelper

2015-09-14 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 14 September 2015 at 11:11, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 09/14/2015 08:38 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> On 2015-09-13 21:02, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> [...] >>> >>> still using the globbing feature for command line arguments in DH_COMPAT=2 >>> mode. >>> Was this re-added in higher levels again? >

Re: [DH] Planning to remove deprecated commands and compat levels in debhelper

2015-09-14 Thread Simon McVittie
On 14/09/15 11:11, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 09/14/2015 08:38 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Are you using dh_movefiles here because dh_install does not support wild >> arguments? Or would dh_install not work for you regardless? > > I didn't check if dh_install supports wild card arguments. I'm us

Re: version format for git snapshot

2015-09-14 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 07:51:09 +0200 Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > my upstream tagged 0.4 a year ago and I want to package the current > master commit a5e5f9e that is 24 commits after 0.4. Please assume > that this makes sense... > > How would you format the upstream part of the packages version >

Re: version format for git snapshot

2015-09-14 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Monday, September 14, 2015, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Makes perfect sense to me to add only the date for snapshot releases - > both revision control system and commit id is irrelevant in version > string - those belong (if at all) in changelog along with release > nickname and whether release co

Re: [DH] Planning to remove deprecated commands and compat levels in debhelper

2015-09-14 Thread Matthias Klose
On 09/14/2015 08:38 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2015-09-13 21:02, Matthias Klose wrote: >> [...] >> >> still using the globbing feature for command line arguments in DH_COMPAT=2 >> mode. >> Was this re-added in higher levels again? >> >> Matthias >> > > Hi Matthias, > > Ok, I was not aware

Re: version format for git snapshot

2015-09-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Colin Watson (2015-09-14 08:51:48) > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 07:51:09AM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote: >> How would you format the upstream part of the packages version >> number? How about 0.4+24+git+a5e5f9e? > > I wouldn't put the commit identifier in the package version at all. > It isn't

Re: version format for git snapshot

2015-09-14 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Pau Garcia i Quiles , 2015-09-14, 10:46: > >> 0.5+git20150531T211420-cdd9d98f2c-1~vivid~pgquiles1 >> > > Still shorter than 1.31~pre0.8052aabdd159bc9050e7dc264f33782c5acce05f-1. > You're not trying hard enough. Oh well, I'm just trying to ge

Re: version format for git snapshot

2015-09-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Pau Garcia i Quiles , 2015-09-14, 10:46: 0.5+git20150531T211420-cdd9d98f2c-1~vivid~pgquiles1 Still shorter than 1.31~pre0.8052aabdd159bc9050e7dc264f33782c5acce05f-1. You're not trying hard enough. -- Jakub Wilk

Bug#798933: ITP: libtie-hash-expire-perl -- Perl module providing hashes with keys that expire after a user-set period

2015-09-14 Thread Florian Schlichting
Package: wnpp Owner: Florian Schlichting Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libtie-hash-expire-perl Version : 0.03 Upstream Author : Jeff Yoak * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Tie-Hash-Expir

Re: version format for git snapshot

2015-09-14 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 07:51:09AM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote: > > How would you format the upstream part of the packages version number? > How > > about 0.4+24+git+a5e5f9e? > > I wouldn't put the commit identifier in the package version at all.

Re: version format for git snapshot

2015-09-14 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello Thomas Koch! On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 07:51:09AM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > my upstream tagged 0.4 a year ago and I want to package the current master > commit a5e5f9e that is 24 commits after 0.4. Please assume that this makes > sense... > > How would you format the upstream par

Bug#798920: ITP: djangorestframework-extensions -- custom extensions for Django REST framework

2015-09-14 Thread Michael Fladischer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Fladischer -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: djangorestframework-extensions Version : 0.2.7 Upstream Author : Gennady Chibisov * URL : https://github.com/chibisov/drf-extensions * License