Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 23:27:48 +0300, ??? wrote: >Actually now I only wanted to install 'sni-qt' package... and I wanted to >wait for the full upgrade until everything is fixed. But apt-get install >sni-qt also fails and that's why I'm writing here :) sni-qt is one of the big probl

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Виталий Филиппов (2015-09-12 22:17:32) >>> apt-get dist-upgrade tries to remove the following packages: >> >> and upgrade rather than dist-upgrade? >> >> Try using aptitude instead of apt. It sometimes does a better job, >> and just 'aptitude' so you get the curses interface makes it _much

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 09/12/2015 08:55 PM, Виталий Филиппов wrote: > Can you please tell when everything will be fixed i.e. when all packages > will be rebuilt with newer gcc? And can you please NOT upload such > "breaking updates" in the future before testing everything that's broken > in experimental?.. Because the

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Виталий Филиппов
apt-get dist-upgrade tries to remove the following packages: There's tons of noise in there that actually should be removed, like most of the libraries (which have newer, conflicting versions), but also some stuff that really shouldn't be removed. What does apt-get upgrade do for you right now?

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Виталий Филиппов
apt-get dist-upgrade tries to remove the following packages: and upgrade rather than dist-upgrade? Try using aptitude instead of apt. It sometimes does a better job, and just 'aptitude' so you get the curses interface makes it _much_ easier to track down what's actually up. 'B' shows broken pac

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Виталий Филиппов
That doesn't make a lot of sense. jessie-updates sits on top of (predictably enough) Jessie and won't contain anything relevant for unstable that isn't already in unstable anyway. Of course, it seems it's just left in there after some upgrades... But it does not make any change either :) just

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Wookey
+++ Виталий Филиппов [2015-09-12 22:31 +0300]: > apt-get dist-upgrade tries to remove the following packages: and upgrade rather than dist-upgrade? Try using aptitude instead of apt. It sometimes does a better job, and just 'aptitude' so you get the curses interface makes it _much_ easier to trac

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2015-09-12 at 22:31 +0300, Виталий Филиппов wrote: > My sources.list contains sid, experimental and jessie-updates (+ oibaf > graphics-drivers ppa) That doesn't make a lot of sense. jessie-updates sits on top of (predictably enough) Jessie and won't contain anything relevant for unstable

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 12 septembre 2015 21:55 +0300, Виталий Филиппов  : > Can you please tell when everything will be fixed i.e. when all packages > will be rebuilt with newer gcc? And can you please NOT upload such > "breaking updates" in the future before testing everything that's broken > in experimental?.. Beca

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Mathieu Parent (Debian)
2015-09-12 21:50 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Parent (Debian) : > 2015-09-12 21:43 GMT+02:00 Russ Allbery : >> Виталий Филиппов writes: >> >>> apt-get dist-upgrade tries to remove the following packages: > > For sure, blender has not transitioned yet. Actually, it just migrated to testing: https://tracker.

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Mathieu Parent (Debian)
2015-09-12 21:43 GMT+02:00 Russ Allbery : > Виталий Филиппов writes: > >> apt-get dist-upgrade tries to remove the following packages: For sure, blender has not transitioned yet. > There's tons of noise in there that actually should be removed, like most > of the libraries (which have newer, con

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Виталий Филиппов writes: > apt-get dist-upgrade tries to remove the following packages: There's tons of noise in there that actually should be removed, like most of the libraries (which have newer, conflicting versions), but also some stuff that really shouldn't be removed. What does apt-get up

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Виталий Филиппов
apt-get dist-upgrade tries to remove the following packages: blender coinor-libcbc3 coinor-libcoinmp1 coinor-libcoinutils3 coinor-libosi1 evince gnome-icon-theme gnome-icon-theme-symbolic kde-window-manager kio-extras konsole kwin-addons kwin-common kwin-x11 libalien-wxwidgets-perl liba

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Виталий Филиппов writes: > Is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5 transition? Or by something > else? Why apt-get dist-upgrade still wants to remove a lot of packages? > It lasts for several weeks, I can't upgrade normally... I've been able to upgrade normally during the entire gcc-5 transi

is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

2015-09-12 Thread Виталий Филиппов
Hi everyone! Is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5 transition? Or by something else? Why apt-get dist-upgrade still wants to remove a lot of packages? It lasts for several weeks, I can't upgrade normally... Can you please tell when everything will be fixed i.e. when all packages will be re

Re: Bug#798639: ITP: restricted-ssh-commands -- Restrict SSH users to a predefined set of commands

2015-09-12 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Thanks for pointing it out. I looked at sshcommand and it serves a > slightly different purpose. sshcommand creates different users for each > command, but restricted-ssh-commands allows to run multiple command > under one user. One configur

Re: cmake GNUInstallDirs question

2015-09-12 Thread Andrew Kelley
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > It outputs "lib: lib". No arch triplet. Is this expected? >> > Yes; you probably want ${CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_LIBDIR}. > > http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.1/module/GNUInstallDirs.html > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-opencl/beign

Re: cmake GNUInstallDirs question

2015-09-12 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
It outputs "lib: lib". No arch triplet. Is this expected? Yes; you probably want ${CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_LIBDIR}. http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.1/module/GNUInstallDirs.html https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-opencl/beignet.git/tree/debian/patches/Enable-multiarch.patch?id=a4be256b30625db8829a

Bug#798741: ITP: simstring -- fast and simple algorithm for approximate string matching/retrieval

2015-09-12 Thread NOKUBI Takatsugu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: NOKUBI Takatsugu * Package name: simstring Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Naoaki Okazaki * URL : http://www.chokkan.org/software/simstring/index.html.en * License : 3-BSD Programming Lang: C++ Description : fast