Re: debian github organization ?

Jonathan Dowland wrote: > Some people and teams in Debian do manage their package sources in git; > others don't. I'm not sure what the stats are at the moment for the > various approaches; there might be a UDD script already that generates > some. I was interested in looking at this, once upon a t

Re: debian github organization ?

On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 17:06 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:22:53PM +0800, mudongliang wrote: > > But I know that debian does not manager source code by git ! > > How can it?? > > Some people and teams in Debian do manage their package sources in git; others > don't. I

Re: debian github organization ?

Ben Finney writes: > Russ Allbery writes: >> Funny, this is why I don't get why people are so upset that some use >> GitHub. Because of how Git works, the impact of lock-in is pretty much >> limited to the non-repository stuff (issues and so forth). > Yet it is exactly those lock-in features th

Re: debian github organization ?

Russ Allbery writes: > Steve McIntyre writes: > > Agreed - it's really annoying to see everybody clamour for a > > centralised single point of of failure for git hosting. :-( > > Funny, this is why I don't get why people are so upset that some use > GitHub. Because of how Git works, the impact o

Re: MBF: build Python 3 modules for packages that support it upstream

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:50:11PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > Severity will be wishlist. Target is the next release / sid after Jessie > release. Draft text and dd-list attached. Please let me know of any false positives if you see them. I'll start filing tomorow night. Cheers, Paul --

Re: debian github organization ?

Steve McIntyre writes: > Ben Finney wrote: >> Paul Tagliamonte writes: >>> So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't think >>> this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we should >>> endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tools. Yes, we should contribute to >>> the F

Re: debian github organization ?

Ben Finney wrote: >Paul Tagliamonte writes: > >> So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't think >> this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we should >> endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tools. Yes, we should contribute to >> the F/OSS community where upstreams

Bug#782796: ITP: libstring-expand-perl -- string utility functions for expanding variables in self-referential sets

Package: wnpp Owner: Axel Beckert Severity: wishlist * Package name: libstring-expand-perl Version : 0.04 Upstream Author : Paul Evans * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/String-Expand * License : Artistic or GPL-1+ Programming Lang: Perl Description

Re: debian github organization ?

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 06:03:12AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Upstream is using a decentralised VCS, it seems a little condescending > to assume they are incapable of using it. An entirely fair point, however, I also think it's quite rude to ignore the workflow they've chosen for contributions --

Re: debian github organization ?

Paul Tagliamonte writes: > So, yes, it's nonfree. Yes, it's controlled by DDs. No, I don't think > this should be the Vcs-Git: target. No, I don't think we should > endorse GitHub. Yes, we need free tools. Yes, we should contribute to > the F/OSS community where upstreams are. That last part see

Re: MBF: build Python 3 modules for packages that support it upstream

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:50:11PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > I'll curate the raw run I did today, since I saw a few false positive > (python 3 backports to python 3) and file them. I'll run a dd-list at > some point before the file. > > Severity will be wishlist. Target is the next release

Re: debian github organization ?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 03:36:45PM -0300, João Vanzuita wrote: > And wanna ask you guys to answer the Jonathan Downland question bellow. > > On 17/04/15 13:06, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >The real question is: what do we gain by hosting such things on github? > >The social stuff, pull requests, etc

Re: debian github organization ?

That's a very nice starting point! Maybe it's a good ideia, but I'm still asking myself why. And wanna ask you guys to answer the Jonathan Downland question bellow. On 17/04/15 13:06, Jonathan Dowland wrote: The real question is: what do we gain by hosting such things on github? The social stu

Re: debian github organization ?

"Milan P. Stanic" writes: > What about gitolite? It is in Debian, can be used with gitweb and have > access control. > N.B. I'm biased (maybe) because I use gitolite for my company > repositories. gitolite is very nice insofar as it goes. I've used it a lot, and still use it in various places.

Re: debian github organization ?

On a side note to this thread, GitLab packaging for Debian is happening silently (and of course slowly) in the Debian Ruby group. Anyone is welcome to help. :) On 17 April 2015 11:07:37 am IST, Marc Haber wrote: >On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:40:21 -0700, Russ Allbery >wrote: >>Iustin Pop writes: >

Re: debian github organization ?

On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 16:10, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > On 04/16/2015 05:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) > or gitblit, which would be easier to integrate into ldap/sso/ssh imho. What about gitolite? It is in Debian, can be used with

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:22:53PM +0800, mudongliang wrote: > But I know that debian does not manager source code by git ! > How can it?? Some people and teams in Debian do manage their package sources in git; others don't. I'm not sure what the stats are at the moment for the various approaches;

Re: debian github organization ?

On 04/16/2015 05:04 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) or gitblit, which would be easier to integrate into ldap/sso/ssh imho. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de

Bug#782761: linux-tools: Please include tools/hv daemons in a binary package

Source: linux-tools Version: 3.16+63 Severity: normal the Linux kernel sources include in the tools/hv directory tools for using Linux in MS Hyper-V virtual machines. The tools include hv-fcopy-daemon, hv-kvp-daemon, hv-vss-daemon Especially hv-vss-daemon is needed to be able to use Hyper-V "Liv

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Sven Bartscher wrote: > I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian, > since we already have alioth. > Maybe someone can enlighten me. I'd love to see the Debian infrastructure rely of Free software, firmware and hardware. However, we ar

Re: selinux-policy-default missing in jessie

On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:50:26 +0200 Tobias Bengfort wrote: > Hi, > > I recently updated my system to jessie. I noticed that some packages > were gone, notably selinux-policy-default. As far as I understand they > have no chance of coming back in because jessie is already frozen. So > do I underst

SELinux missing in jessie

Hi, I recently updated my system to jessie. I noticed that some packages were gone, notably selinux-policy-default. As far as I understand they have no chance of coming back in because jessie is already frozen. So do I understand correctly that SELinux will not be included in the upcoming version

Processed: Re: Bug#782749: general: All browsers except Links2 crash constantly and iceweasel is broken

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #782749 [general] general: All browsers except Links2 crash constantly and iceweasel is broken Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 782749: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782749 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#782749: general: All browsers except Links2 crash constantly and iceweasel is broken

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, > All browsers I have tried but Links2 crash constantly. Often they will not > run at all. Please provide more detail about this. Which browsers did you try: How did you install and start them? What do they output? > I expect the browsers to work and not crash

Bug#782749: general: All browsers except Links2 crash constantly and iceweasel is broken

Package: general Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? * What outc

Concern about libdvdcss distribution (Re: (My last) bits from the DPL)

Hi, > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 04:47:19PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > Libdvdcss and ZFS soon in Debian? > > = > > > > We received legal advice from Software Freedom Law Center about the > > inclusion of libdvdcss and ZFS in Debian, which should unblock the

Bug#782746: ITP: rally -- benchmark System for OpenStack

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand * Package name: rally Version : 0.0.3 Upstream Author : OpenStack Foundation * URL : https://github.com/stackforge/rally * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Python Description : benchmark Syst

Bug#782745: ITP: orocos-log4cpp -- C++ library for flexible logging

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda" * Package name: orocos-log4cpp Version : 2.8.0 Upstream Author : Orocos Developers * URL : https://github.com/orocos-toolchain/log4cpp * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C++ Description

Re: debian github organization ?

On 16 Apr 2015 12:05 pm, "Sven Bartscher" < sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de> wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:04:07 -0600 > Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :) > > I don't a reason to have gitlab/github/someother git stuff for debian, > since we already have

Re: debian github organization ?

Russell Stuart writes: > On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 23:13 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> However, I still stand by the decision to only support a single VCS, at >> least when you start, because you can move a lot faster and implement a >> lot more functionality that people care a great deal about. > W

Re: debian github organization ?

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 23:13:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >Marc Haber writes: >> Thankfully, git is by far the best VCS on the market and the vast >> majority of people seem to agree. But imagine the outcry if ten years >> ago Sourceforge had said "our VCS is svn and we don't support anything >> el

Re: debian github organization ?

First a Mel Cupa. I called the SourceForge system Apollo. It's actual name is Apache Allura. Brain fart. On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 23:13 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Er, they did, didn't they? I could have sworn that they only supported > CVS initially, and then only added Subversion, and getting