Hi,
Marc Haber:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 22:31:19 +0100, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> >As usual, the systemd critics are just misinformed. This comforts me.
> >because it means that their views can be easily ignored.
>
> And as usual, you don't make any effort to change the misinformation.
Hi Marc,
while your argument is true and known we have no idea what Harald really
means and thus we are wasting time in wild speculations. :-(
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:15:41PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:50:13 +0100, Andreas Tille
> wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer"
* Package name: boomaga
Version : 0.6.2
Upstream Author : Alexander Sokolov
* URL : https://github.com/Boomaga/boomaga
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I noticed that php restarts apache but this restart is part of php's
> postinst script. Is there are a trigger based solution of which I am
> not aware of?
There is also a hard-coded list of packages to be restarted if
installed (and configured) in
Re: Axel Beckert 2015-02-20 <20150220221043.gh3...@sym.noone.org>
> > > Just FYI. Guido Gunther has done something similar with whatmaps
> > >
> > > https://honk.sigxcpu.org/piki/projects/whatmaps
> >
> > I count at least 6 implementations of the concept now:
> >
> > checkrestart (from debian-goo
Hi,
sorry for reopening this thread. I don't read debian-devel@l.d.o
regularily and stumbled upon this thread by accident via some blog
posting
(http://www.deimeke.net/dirk/blog/?/archives/3500-Restart-check-html;
German).
(Cc'ing Ritesh as requested as well the primary maintainers of the
men
Quoting Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (2015-02-20 22:10:03)
> Lets say there is a daemon / service D which is using library L. Both
> are in separate packages. Security updates are handled via
> unattended-upgrades. Now lets assume that unattended-upgrades upgrades
> L. After that upgrade it does no
Lets say there is a daemon / service D which is using library L. Both
are in separate packages. Security updates are handled via
unattended-upgrades. Now lets assume that unattended-upgrades upgrades
L. After that upgrade it does not restart D which means D remains
vulnerable until the box restarts
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:50:13 +0100, Andreas Tille
wrote:
>I have no idea why you concluded that the Debian package exists since
>upstream is "not good enough". Usually it is better to include a Debian
>package into official Debian since you are profitting from several QA
>means which is not the c
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:04:56 +0100, Harald Dunkel
wrote:
>Problem: The Debian maintainer messed up the version numbers
>and had to introduce a "1:" for his foo package. Now upstream's
>package always appears to be out of date, forcing me to override
>apt-get.
That is unfortunately a situation t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Am 20.02.2015 um 13:36 schrieb Jakub Wilk:
> IMO the policy is overly strict and it should be relaxed.
Speaking of relaxing things: could this be solved with linker relaxations?
The compiler would need to generate both PIC and non-PIC code in t
Hi!
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 11:30:02 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Would it worth to have a procedure like "dpkg-capoverride" so that
> whenever a package needs to change a capability, the change gets
> registered somewhere other than the filesystem itself?
Yes and no. It might be more convenient,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:53:27PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> If the Debian packages are not as good as the upstream ones, such that
> you end up having to use the upstream ones for some reason, then that
> also seems like a bug. If you can help the Debian maintainer to fix that
> bug (e.g. by
On 20/02/15 14:25, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> IMHO there should be a policy for the special case, that
> there is a naming conflict between upstream's source or
> binary packages, and the packages included in Debian.
Whatever we might say on the subject in Debian policy, upstream-produced
packages are
Hi Harald,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 03:25:32PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > Just to understand your problem: there is a package foo. Debian provides
> > it with version 1:A-B and upstream provides some self-compiled packages
> > with the same name under version C-D (and C-D < 1:A-B) and you want
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Clint Byrum
* Package name: presentty
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : James E. Blair
* URL : https://gitorious.org/presentty
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Console-based presentation s
Package: wnpp
Owner: Christopher Hoskin
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libmime-lite-tt-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Yasuhiro Horiuchi
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/MIME-Lite-T
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 03:25:32PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 02/20/15 13:09, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> >
> > Just to understand your problem: there is a package foo. Debian provides
> > it with version 1:A-B and upstream provides some self-compiled packages
> > with the same name under versio
Hi Daniel,
On 02/20/15 13:09, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>
> Just to understand your problem: there is a package foo. Debian provides
> it with version 1:A-B and upstream provides some self-compiled packages
> with the same name under version C-D (and C-D < 1:A-B) and you want to
> force apt to instal
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gianfranco Costamagna
* Package name: python-darts-lib-utils-lru
Version: 0.5~git20140220-1
Upstream Author : 2011 Dirk Esser https://code.google.com/p/cld2/
* License: MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description: Simple dictionary with
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:09:20PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> ...
>
> These are the ways, I would try.
While this perfectly answers to question of the original poster it is
hiding a potential problem inside a (currently unknown) Debian package.
Harald, in case you follow this hint, pleas
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: seqprep
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : John St. John
* URL : http://seqanswers.com/wiki/SeqPrep
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : stripping adaptors and/or merging p
* Jeff Epler , 2015-02-19, 17:19:
Here are two scenarios where building a static library (libfoo) with
-fPIC is desirable:
* libbar has a stable API, so it should be shipped as a .so, but if it
links libfoo.a, and libfoo.a is not -fPIC, then libbar has to be
shipped as a a static library too
On 20/02/2015 12:06, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 19/02/15 23:19, Jeff Epler wrote:
>> Here are two scenarios where building a static library (libfoo) with
>> -fPIC is desirable
> ...
>> I wonder whether these scenarios were considered when the Policy was
>> written.
> Conversely, when that part of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: stacks
Version : 1.25
Upstream Author : Julian Catchen
* URL : http://creskolab.uoregon.edu/stacks/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : pipeline for building loci fro
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I would like to use upstream's Debian/Ubuntu packages for a
> certain tool 'foo'. Its closer to what I need, and I don't
> have migrate between both versions before asking the mailing
> list for help or for reporting/fixing problems.
>
> Problem: The Debian maintainer messe
On 19/02/15 23:19, Jeff Epler wrote:
> Here are two scenarios where building a static library (libfoo) with
> -fPIC is desirable
...
> I wonder whether these scenarios were considered when the Policy was
> written.
Conversely, when that part of the policy was written, 32-bit x86 was the
major arch
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Having a way to set caps in a declarative way and let dpkg handle the
> setup would be nice imo.
Very much agreed.
Just this week I ran into an issue where a system restored from backup
didn't have a working ping or check_ping nagios check due to missi
Am 20.02.2015 um 11:30 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> Now I am worried about what other things in my system that I didn't
> discover yet will not work because of not using rsync -X.
> Do we have a list of packages where we use extended attributes?
I would try something like "grep setcap /var/lib/dpkg/i
Greetings.
I installed jessie on a kvm virtual machine, then did rsync to a real
partition (long story short: I didn't want debian-installer to format
all my swap partitions). As a result, the ping command did not work as
a normal user anymore and said this:
ping: icmp open socket: Operation not
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:04:56AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to use upstream's Debian/Ubuntu packages for a
> certain tool 'foo'. Its closer to what I need, and I don't
> have migrate between both versions before asking the mailing
> list for help or for reporting
Hi Harald,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:04:56AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I would like to use upstream's Debian/Ubuntu packages for a
> certain tool 'foo'. Its closer to what I need, and I don't
> have migrate between both versions before asking the mailing
> list for help or for reporting/fi
Hi folks,
I would like to use upstream's Debian/Ubuntu packages for a
certain tool 'foo'. Its closer to what I need, and I don't
have migrate between both versions before asking the mailing
list for help or for reporting/fixing problems.
Problem: The Debian maintainer messed up the version nu
33 matches
Mail list logo
