Bug#775249: ITP: swe-extrapolated-data -- Swiss Ephemeris data file for far past, far future

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paul Elliott * Package name: swe-extrapolated-data Version : 1 Upstream Author : Alois Treindl, Dieter Koch, Paul Elliott * URL : http://swissephauto.blackpatchpanel.com/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: data

Bug#775246: general: Debian does wake from suspend. It either hard reboots or remains unresponsive.

John Ammerman writes: >* What led up to the situation? > Suspending this computer. >* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > I put my computer to sleep. >* What was the outcome of this action? > When I wake the computer in any

Bug#775246: general: Debian does wake from suspend. It either hard reboots or remains unresponsive.

Package: general Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Suspending this computer. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? I put my computer t

Re: desire

Le lundi 12 janvier 2015 à 21:11 +0300, mr scripter a écrit : > Please, give the ffmpeg package back! Exclusing this package from > jessie is great mistake. I know nobody, who wants to use avconv > instead of ffmpeg. People had been told, right here on this ML, and in great detail, what to do if t

Re: desire

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 09:11:42PM +0300, mr scripter wrote: > Please, give the ffmpeg package back! Exclusing this package from jessie > is great mistake. Sorry but the jessie ship has sailed. Ffmpeg packages are partially ready, it's likely we'll see them in stretch. > I know nobody, who want

Bug#775232: ITP: libcaf -- C++ Actor Framework

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Robert Lemmen * Package name: libcaf Version : 0.12.1 Upstream Author : Dominik Charousset * URL : https://github.com/actor-framework/actor-framework * License : BSD, Boost Programming Lang: C++ Description : C++

desire

Please, give the ffmpeg package back! Exclusing this package from jessie is great mistake. I know nobody, who wants to use avconv instead of ffmpeg. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Ar

Re: length of a package extended description

Quoting Vincent Lefevre (2015-01-12 16:51:39) > On 2015-01-09 14:56:14 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: >> On Fri, 09 Jan 2015, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >>> The blank lines are not the only problem. Removing them would be a >>> big step forward, but the description would actually still be much >>> too l

Bug#775210: ITP: haskell-decimal -- Manipulating decimal numbers

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dmitry Bogatov * Package name: haskell-decimal Version : 0.4.2 Upstream Author : Paul Johnson * URL : http://hackage.haskell.org/package/Decimal * License : BSD3 Programming Lang: Haskell Description : Manipulati

Re: length of a package extended description

On 2015-01-13 01:42:57 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 01:24:20PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2015-01-10 13:34:37 +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > > Nonsense, the format is trivial and stable. > > > > I've never seen that it was stable. > > > > > A quick one-line

Re: length of a package extended description

On 2015-01-10 17:27:39 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > I also think it would be best to switch that Description to use list > syntax. Daniel Burrows prepared a policy proposal some time ago, and > did some analysis: > > > >

Re: length of a package extended description

On 2015-01-09 14:56:14 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 09 Jan 2015, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > The blank lines are not the only problem. Removing them would be a big > > step forward, but the description would actually still be much too > > long (more than 900 lines). > > Lines aren't really

Bug#775192: ITP: mininet -- process-based network emulator

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tomasz Buchert * Package name: mininet Version : 2.2.0 Upstream Author : Bob Lantz et al. * URL : http://mininet.org/ * License : BSD-like (mininet-license) Programming Lang: Python Description : process-based net

Re: length of a package extended description

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 01:24:20PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2015-01-10 13:34:37 +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Nonsense, the format is trivial and stable. > > I've never seen that it was stable. > > > A quick one-line-ish fix for this (requires a modern shell) is: > > > > apt-cache

Re: length of a package extended description

On 2015-01-10 13:34:37 +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Nonsense, the format is trivial and stable. I've never seen that it was stable. > A quick one-line-ish fix for this (requires a modern shell) is: > > apt-cache show texlive-latex-extra | tr '\n' $'\001' | sed $'s/\001 / /g' | > tr $'\001' '

Re: length of a package extended description

On 2015-01-10 10:50:58 +1100, Riley Baird wrote: > True. I honestly think that this is such an insignificant problem that > updating the sed or perl script every so often wouldn't be that much of > a problem. But this may yield bug reports, which annoy the developers. -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: