On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 11:14:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> "install it locally" is most easily done by "generate a package, install said
>> package". Can we stop judging people by what they're trying to do, please?
>
>I didn't intend any judgem
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> "install it locally" is most easily done by "generate a package, install said
> package". Can we stop judging people by what they're trying to do, please?
I didn't intend any judgement, could you suggest an alternate wording
that wouldn't
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Svante Signell wrote:
> I have a question about how to run tests for a package needing root to
> run properly, fakeroot is not sufficient. I've made one of the packages
> to build properly with: sudo run_test and fixed the sudoers file. But
> how to fix that so th
Free software is about the sharing of that freedom
So there is nothing wrong with urging people to reconsider if non-free is
really what they want
(therefore my idea to add that to clause5)
We shouldn't even be supporting non-free by hosting it, yet we do
So it is a good idea to mention to peo
Theodore Ts'o writes:
> The flip side is that you can get burned by people trying to compile
> from your git tree on either significantly older or significantly newer
> system than what you typically use to develop against, and if autoconf
> and friends have introduced incompatible changes to the
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 08:26:45AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I understand why you feel this way, particularly given the tools that
> you're working on, but this is not something I'm going to change as
> upstream. Git does not contain generated files, and the tarball release
> does, because thos
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:37:26AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > You have convinced me that in this case it's going to have to be that
> > way, so my prejudices notwithstanding. I've rationalised the pain away
> > by deciding it's no so bad as any competent programmer could see that is
> > it onl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Leo Iannacone
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-etag
Version : 1.4.0
Upstream Author : Douglas Christopher Wilson
* URL : https://github.com/jshttp/etag
* License : Expat
Programming Lang
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 07:19:07AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Mathieu Slabbinck wrote:
>
> > I was wondering if anyone could point me to the best practice way of doing
> > this.
>
> Best practice would be to contact the copyright holder and ask them to
> convert the
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:46:27PM +0200, Michael Ole Olsen wrote:
> having a too large non-free repos is not a good thing IMO.
Be that as it may, there's no reason why Debian as a whole should agree with
that.
--
It is easy to love a country that is famous for chocolate and beer
-- Barack Ob
Russell Stuart writes:
> Not really. I'm about documentation reflecting reality. Think of
> putting an electrical component whose documentation says its 200 degrees
> on a motherboard, only to find it fails at 190. When you ask why, is
> "well we design it for 200, but only test it to 180" a s
On 11 October 2014 17:27, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about how to run tests for a package needing root to
> run properly, fakeroot is not sufficient. I've made one of the packages
> to build properly with: sudo run_test and fixed the sudoers file. But
> how to fix that so
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: otb
Version : 4.2.1
Upstream Author : OTB Team
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/orfeo-toolbox/files/OTB/
* License : CeCILL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : ORFEO Toolbox
Hello,
I have a question about how to run tests for a package needing root to
run properly, fakeroot is not sufficient. I've made one of the packages
to build properly with: sudo run_test and fixed the sudoers file. But
how to fix that so the package can be built on a buildd?
Thanks!
--
To
Hi Dimitri,
On Do 09 Okt 2014 11:55:00 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
So At the moment, I have exact same version as the upstream "releases"
are in the openSUSE:Tools repository. Why should version numbers
diverge from what's used in openSUSE and upstream?
Ich kann nur ein bistchen Deutsch
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: jenkins-matrix-auth-plugin
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Kohsuke Kawaguchi
* URL : https://github.com/jenkinsci/matrix-auth-plugin
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Java
Description
Good evening
http://fushengde.net/change.php?race=ukdhsv3670tm
brittste...@aol.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141011124254.08bb2...@bende
Hi,
>> I use KDE on Sid.
>>
>> Lately (but I can't pinpoint the exact moment), plugging an USB drive
>> has stopped generating any reaction and I need to mount manually.
>
> You need to grab udisks2 2.1.3-1 from snapshot.debian.org, any later version
> doesn't work. This includes the current ve
Hi,
>> see [3] –, neither is pm-suspend called by systemd's sleep.target.
>
> Not by systemd as pid 1, but if you run with upstart or sysvinit,
> systemd-shim will use pm-utils if it is installed, so that suspend
> quirks still work.
>
> IMHO it is a bit unfortunate that all the suspend quirks a
19 matches
Mail list logo
