Hi,
Matt Zagrabelny:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Matthias Urlichs
> wrote:
>
> > adduser tango --uid $UID --gid $GID
>
> typo?
>
> adduser _tango --uid $UID --gid $GID
>
Right. Of course. Thanks for spotting. :-/
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-req
Hi,
Brian May:
> I don't think you should use normally be feature branches with git-dpm.
> Rather you edit the commit directly (whether by rebase or --amend).
>
If Upstream uses git and wants you to send a pull request when you add a
feature (or fix a bug), then using a feature branch is what you
Hi,
Santiago Vila:
> To me, it's sad to see that we seem to be officially endorsing Bitcoin
> without any debate at all. If we accept Bitcoin, we should probably
> accept competing so-called-cryptocurrencies as well. Should Debian
> favour one cryptocurrency over the others?
>
No, but it's the mo
On 26 August 2014 16:12, Manoj Srivastava
wrote:
> http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Serializing_Git_Branches.pdf has a
> demonstration of the differences in history given an upstream and two
> feature branches with two commits each, using git-dpm and git-debcherry.
>
Interesting review.
Howev
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
owner: hartm...@debian.org
URL: http://www.shibboleth.org/
Source: svn https://svn.shibboleth.net/extensions/cpp-sp-resolver/trunk
Description: Shibboleth library to access Attribute Resolver
The Shibboleth Service provider consumes information about an
authenti
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
owner: hartm...@debian.org
URL: git://git.project-moonshot.org/trust_router.git
http://www.project-moonshot.org/
license: bsd-3-clause
Description: The trust router establishes a DH key between two RADIUS
servers to protect a RADIUS over TLS session. GSS-API au
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:40:15AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> The EFF changed its mind two years later.
>
>
> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/05/eff-will-accept-bitcoins-support-digital-liberty
Ok, from the above link:
You can now give Bitcoins to EFF in the same way that you can gi
Hi,
Santiago Vila wrote (27 Aug 2014 00:08:03 GMT) :
> The EFF has a very well written rationale why accepting Bitcoins is
> not necessarily a good idea, see point 3 here:
> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/06/eff-and-bitcoin
It seems useful to note that, since then, they've decided to accept
B
Le Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 02:08:03AM +0200, Santiago Vila a écrit :
>
> I don't think Debian should accept donations in Bitcoin, as such thing
> could be considered as an endorsement of Bitcoin. The EFF has a very
> well written rationale why accepting Bitcoins is not necessarily a
> good idea, see
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 09:28:11AM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Donations in Bitcoin
>
>
> Crytocurrencies have been the subject of a lot of attention recently.
> Debian received its first Bitcoin donation, which was handled in a ad-hoc
> manner as we don't have any infrastr
Hi,
PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel:
> BÙT
> in case of an idempotent pre/post scripts.
> what happend if I delete the tango users before creating the new _tango user.
>
Actually, nothing prevents you from creating _tango first.
> another important point in my case is that I need to do some mysql operat
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-protorpc-standalone
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : Daniel Hermes
* URL : https://github.com/jeremydw/protorpc-standalone
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Descri
Package: general
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation? New installed debian on a dell inspiron 15
7000 series with gnome
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-pysocks
Version : 1.5.0
Upstream Author : Anorov Vorona
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PySocks
* License : BSD-3-clauses
Programming Lang: Python
Description : socket-l
> # usermod -l newname oldname
> (Other things can also be modified at the same time, see the man page.)
thanks a lot
Frederic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists
Hi!
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 11:02:54 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> > This has the advantage of being short and downstreams not having lots of
> > Debian-*
> > users on their systems possibly confusing users not familiar with
> > Debian. I'd be nice to standardize on this.
>
> I have the
I am the maintainer of the intel-microcode and iucode-tool packages, used to
update the microcode[1] on Intel system processors (CPU chip).
I'd like to know whether the kernel microcode update is working well on some
of the older Intel 32-bit processors or not. These computers were sold
between y
> Fake it.
> UID=$(id -u tango)
> GID=$(id -g tango)
> deluser tango
> adduser tango --uid $UID --gid $GID
I like this fake rename because it cause no troubles to the files already owned
by the tango user
BÙT
in case of an idempotent pre/post scripts.
what happend if I delete the tango users be
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:40:04PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Matthias Urlichs
> wrote:
>
> > adduser tango --uid $UID --gid $GID
>
> typo?
>
> adduser _tango --uid $UID --gid $GID
The sysadmin may have written scripts and things that assume the
existing
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> adduser tango --uid $UID --gid $GID
typo?
adduser _tango --uid $UID --gid $GID
-mz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
Hi,
PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel:
> I would like to rename the system user tango -> _tango
> But I do not know how to do this rename properly :((
>
Fake it.
UID=$(id -u tango)
GID=$(id -g tango)
deluser tango
adduser tango --uid $UID --gid $GID
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky
* Package name: python-admesh
Version : 0.98
Upstream Author : Miro Hrončok
* URL : https://github.com/admesh/python-admesh
* License : GPL-2
Description : Python bindings for the ADMesh, program for p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cdist
Version : 3.1.6
Upstream Author : Nico Schottelius
* URL or Web page : http://www.nico.schottelius.org/software/cdist/
* License : GPL-3+
Description : Usable Configuration Management System
cdist is a usable co
> This has the advantage of being short and downstreams not having lots of
> Debian-*
> users on their systems possibly confusing users not familiar with
> Debian. I'd be nice to standardize on this.
I have the same problem in one of my package. #737956
I would like to rename the system user tang
Hi Guido,
On Di 26 Aug 2014 12:14:58 CEST, Guido Günther wrote:
That said it'd be nice to know why it's more convenient to not have
the upstream sources in git since I think one misses out on many of
the advantages of git based packaging (like rebasing patches to new
upstream versions).
The
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 03:53:22PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 25/08/14 14:01, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> > is there for Debian a daemon user naming scheme or custom ?
>
> Several :-(
>
> The ones I've seen suggested are (assuming a package, daemon or user
> whose simple name is "foo"):
>
> *
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:11:16PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
[..snip..]
> >- shall we standardize the "pristine-tar" branch?
>
> I'd say "No" here. With packaging of the MATE desktop environment I started
> maintaining only the debian/ folders in the packaging Git repositories (e.g.
> [1]). So, I
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 08:19:48AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 26/08/14 07:01, Brian May wrote:
> > In gbp-pq [...] There is no history kept of
> > the patch-queue branch. Possibly the patch-queue branch shouldn't be
> > pushed to remote repositories, because rebasing is expected.
>
> You ar
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:38:05PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> On 25 August 2014 14:34, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> > I'm beginning to think that what we want is for gbp and git-dpm to
> > interoperate, such that any individual maintainer can use whichever tool
> > they
> > choose, but would still allo
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014, at 14:02, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 02:35:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > #756975 dpkg-dev: dpkg-genchanges option to only include arch:all debs
>
> This is now available in dpkg 1.17.11, and as mentioned on the bug
> report, you can use it in at le
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:50:31 +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> On 25.08.14 19:53:53, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 15:54, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> > > > Am Sonntag, den 24.08.2014, 20:32 +0200 schrieb Ralf Jung:
> > > > > > https://wiki.debian.org/IDN
> > > > > > Summary
On 26/08/14 07:01, Brian May wrote:
> In gbp-pq [...] There is no history kept of
> the patch-queue branch. Possibly the patch-queue branch shouldn't be
> pushed to remote repositories, because rebasing is expected.
You are correct in thinking that it is conventional to avoid pushing the
patch-que
32 matches
Mail list logo
