On 25 August 2014 14:34, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I'm beginning to think that what we want is for gbp and git-dpm to
> interoperate, such that any individual maintainer can use whichever tool
> they
> choose, but would still allow the team to adhere to consensus
> recommendations,
> so there's no gu
On Aug 24, 2014, at 08:33 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>git-buildpackage's gbp pq system is what I use. I believe git-dpm is more
>complicated and comprehensive, but gbp pq is simple enough in its
>operations that it doesn't take long to wrap your mind around it.
git-dpm seems pretty easy to use as w
Brian May writes:
> On 24 August 2014 04:24, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Right, exactly. That's super-annoying to do if you were keeping
>> everything mixed together in the master branch, much easier if you were
>> keeping separate branches for each fix but keeping those separate
>> branches is itse
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sergio Schvezov
* Package name: golang-qml.v0
Version : 0.0~git20140824-1
Upstream Author : Gustavo Niemeyer
* URL : http://gopkg.in/qml.v0
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Graphical QML applic
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-e1071
Version : 1.6-3-1
Upstream Author : David Meyer, Evgenia Dimitriadou, Kurt Hornik, Andreas
Weingessel, and Friedrich Leisch.
* URL or Web page : http://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/e1071/index
On 24 August 2014 04:24, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Right, exactly. That's super-annoying to do if you were keeping
> everything mixed together in the master branch, much easier if you were
> keeping separate branches for each fix but keeping those separate branches
> is itself incredibly annoying, a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Landaeta
* Package name: libjavamail-api-java
Version : 1.5.2
Upstream Author : Oracle
* URL : https://javamail.java.net/nonav/docs/api/
* License : GPLv2, CDDL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : JavaMail
Le Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:11:16PM +, Mike Gabriel a écrit :
>
> >- shall we standardize the "pristine-tar" branch?
>
> I'd say "No" here. With packaging of the MATE desktop environment I
> started maintaining only the debian/ folders in the packaging Git
> repositories (e.g. [1]). So, I am n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tzafrir Cohen
* Package name: asterisk-testsuite
Version : SVN snapshot
Upstream Author : Matthew Jordan and various others
* URL :
https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Test+Suite+Documentation
* License
Hi,
On Sun Aug 24, 2014 at 09:28:11 -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Assets - infrastructure
> ===
>
> Other minor expenses: SSL certificates (207€ + 180€), cage nuts (10€),
> network switch (417.50€), fans (£43.68), USB cables (£11.39), serial
> terminal adapter (39.08€), seri
Hello Ralf,
Am Sonntag, den 24.08.2014, 20:32 +0200 schrieb Ralf Jung:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/IDN
> > Summary: webbrowser support it in general but email clients still lack
> > the support of it.
>
> Why do you list Icedove as non-supporting? I just sent a mail to your
> echo service, and
Joss wrote:
>
>I think there are several ways to do that:
> * tweak the debian-cd scripts to build GNOME images for Linux
>architectures and Xfce or MATE images for !linux (I canât tell
>how hard it is)
It's perfectly feasible; at the moment, the debian-cd scripts on
pette
Hey Noël,
> I'm collecting the status of IDN in Debian on
> https://wiki.debian.org/IDN
Nice :D
> Summary: webbrowser support it in general but email clients still lack
> the support of it.
Why do you list Icedove as non-supporting? I just sent a mail to your
echo service, and got a reply. Is
Hello,
I'm collecting the status of IDN in Debian on
https://wiki.debian.org/IDN
Summary: webbrowser support it in general but email clients still lack
the support of it.
If you could test your not listed client(s) with an IDN domain would
help.
Thank you.
--
Noël Köthe
Debian GNU/Linux, w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Landaeta
* Package name: libjavaee7-api-java
Version : 7.0
Upstream Author : Oracle
* URL : http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/
* License : GPLv2, CDDL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : JavaEE 7.0 Full
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> is it normal to not get any kind of feedback on dcut? I was expecting
> a confirmation by mail somehow.
For the archive:
No it is not normal, it simply happens if you let dcut send out mail
with invalid sender.
Thanks to Ansgar for enlightening me.
cu Andreas
--
`Wh
Hi Raphael, hi all,
On Fr 15 Aug 2014 16:16:01 CEST, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
- how do we tag the package releases?
- pkg/
(note: git-buildpackage uses debian/ but I find this confusing
as we then also have the "debian/" prefix for ubuntu or kali uploads, we
don't need the vendor prefix
Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> The reason I am asking is that I seem to be unable to reschedule
> successfully. I want to further delay the *prelude* uploads so they do
> not get caught up and further delay the perl transition.
[..]
Second try, with identical commandline has worked now.
cu Andre
Hello,
is it normal to not get any kind of feedback on dcut? I was expecting
a confirmation by mail somehow.
The reason I am asking is that I seem to be unable to reschedule
successfully. I want to further delay the *prelude* uploads so they do
not get caught up and further delay the perl transit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Retout
* Package name: node-validator
Version : 3.17.0
Upstream Author : Chris O'Hara
* URL : http://github.com/chriso/validator.js
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : String validati
20 matches
Mail list logo
