If we can, I'd like to remove emacs23 from unstable/testing before the
freeze. To make that possible, any relevant packages will need to
migrate to emacs24, or just include support for emacs24.
In a while, assuming there are no showstopping objections, I'll see
about filing the relevant bugs for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai)"
* Package name: ruby-delayer
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Toshiaki Asai
* URL : https://rubygems.org/gems/delayer
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Ruby libra
Hi Jonas,
On 06/05/14, 11:05am, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Ghostscript have changed its license from GPL-3+ to AGPL-3+ since
> version 9.07.
>
> Ghostscript includes a library - libgs9 - licensed as AGPL-3+ like the
> rest of the project. It also includes a set of Type1 fonts apparently¹
> lice
Hi everyone,
I'm a little worried about bug #702005 and the lack of attention it's getting.
This bug is marked as resolved, and indeed it has been resolved for jessie and
sid, but not for wheezy. This bug breaks Python 2.7. Every person that tries to
upgrade python2.7 and python2.7-minimal from v
Hi,
Kevin Chadwick:
> > * last but not least: if you do have a tangible reason for your post, i.e.
> > one of your packages doesn't work with the way systemd is packaged,
> > kindly tell us which package that is and what you're trying to do.
>
> My first mail stated it.
Did not. See below.
Hi Matthias,
your answer exemplifies very well what I mean with “pressed by the machine”…
I will reply on one point only.
Le Wed, May 07, 2014 at 01:46:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Am 06.05.2014 03:05, schrieb Charles Plessy:
> >
> > When the first mass rebuilds with GCC and porting i
Am 06.05.2014 03:05, schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Le Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:56:48PM +0200, Bas Wijnen a écrit :
>>
>> I'm happy to see that there is consensus anyway that forwarding bugs upstream
>> is the task of the maintainer.
>
> Hi all,
>
> being a package maintainer, I am always uncomfortable
Dear all,
I have uploaded an update of mime-support, to version 3.55. Among the most
visible changes:
- update-mime does not automatically quote anymore “%s” when collecting the
package-provided mailcap lines from /usr/lib/mime/package/. This may
reveal bugs with applications that did no
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 11:05:11AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Ghostscript have changed its license from GPL-3+ to AGPL-3+ since
> version 9.07.
I guess given that GPL-3+ would've been a problem in itself already and
given that GPL-3 and AGPL-3 are compatible, that there can't be that
many p
previously on this list Matthias Urlichs contributed:
> > >
> > > Sorry, but I suspect the latter.
> >
> > Why did I expect any reasonable and balanced discussion! I suspect
> > but haven't mentioned that I expect the reasons for bundling these
> > components together to be on highly questionabl
On Sun, 4 May 2014, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
> The installer already asks whether to enable non-free repositories. Perhaps
This could get a loud warning, yes.
> the warning could be more verbose differentiating between open-source-but-non-
> free (GFDL etc.) and closed-source.
There is no diffe
Op vrijdag 25 april 2014 19:34:02 schreef Daniel Pocock:
> When FTP masters approve a package from NEW, they might well see
that
> the js is not really in use - but somebody (upstream or maintainer)
> may change something after 6 months and the js does get used
That argument goes for just about a
Op zaterdag 26 april 2014 16:51:57 schreef Ben Finney:
> "Steve M. Robbins" writes:
> > On April 25, 2014 11:02:29 PM Ben Finney wrote:
> > > We promise the source for everything any recipient downloads as
part
> > > of Debian. If non-source files are distributed in Debian source
> > > packages,
Hi,
Kevin Chadwick:
> previously on this list Matthias Urlichs contributed:
>
> > The second case is a no-brainer. Many packages in Debian consist of more
> > than one binary, of which you need at most one (if that). Do you really
> > want to mass-file a bug against all of these _and_ the package
On 5 May 2014 18:53, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>> Le dimanche, 4 mai 2014, 02.14:17 peter green a écrit :
>>> Personally I'd add a (build-)depends on the relicensed gmp in the next
>>> gnutls28 upload. That way packages can (build-)depend on the new
>>> gnutls and be as
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le dimanche, 4 mai 2014, 02.14:17 peter green a écrit :
>> Personally I'd add a (build-)depends on the relicensed gmp in the next
>> gnutls28 upload. That way packages can (build-)depend on the new
>> gnutls and be assured of getting a GPLv2 compatible version.
Hello
Package: debbugs
Severity: normal
Control: retitle -1 -done messages with only a Version pseudoheader do not get
turned into fully qualified verisons; see #729576.
On Tue, 06 May 2014, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I could see in a mail from control@b.d.o:
>
> [...]
> After four attempts, the followi
Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Ghostscript licensing changed to AGPL"):
...
> Seems that these projects may link against Ghostscript, and therefore
> (possibly) effectively becomes AGPL-3+ with this change:
Thanks for looking into this and bringing it to our attention.
Do you know whether all those p
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 11:05:11AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> AGPL Ghostscript is now in experimental. How to proceed?
Upload to unstable since there's no actual problem?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: tracebox
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Gregory Detal et al.
* URL or Web page : http://www.tracebox.org/
* License : GPLv2+
Description : Middlebox Detection Tool
Tracebox is a tool that allows to detect middleboxes
I could see in a mail from control@b.d.o:
[...]
After four attempts, the following changes were unable to be made:
fixed_versions of #731426 is 'systemd/204-9' not '204-9'
fixed_versions of #726763 is 'systemd/204-9' not '204-9'
Failed to forcibly merge 729576: Unable to modify bugs so they could
> > Sorry, but I suspect the latter.
>
> Why did I expect any reasonable and balanced discussion!
Ever read you own "signature"?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lis
On Tuesday 06 May 2014 11:03:07 Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 05/02/2014 06:17 PM, David Goodenough wrote:
> > On Friday 02 May 2014 11:32:41 Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> >> ¡Hola Paul!
> >>
> >> El 2014-05-02 a las 08:40 +0800, Paul Wise escribió:
> >>> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Maximiliano Curi
Ghostscript have changed its license from GPL-3+ to AGPL-3+ since
version 9.07.
Ghostscript includes a library - libgs9 - licensed as AGPL-3+ like the
rest of the project. It also includes a set of Type1 fonts apparently¹
licensed the same.
I've tried² suggest relicensing of the library part,
On 6 May 2014 03:06, Paul Wise wrote:
> chdist also sets APT_CONFIG, it doesn't however run bash but it would
> be trivial to add that.
I would like to do it by myself, but, as I already said, I am not
familiar with perl.
These are the requirements apt-venv satisfies, It would be great if
also c
25 matches
Mail list logo
