Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2014-01-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:34:49AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > > You rightly point out that keeping the architectures in testing has a > > cost, because the architectures will block testing migration. But are > > the kfreebsd archs actually causing testing blockages, in practice? If > > there a

Re: Better pdiff handling for apt

2014-01-04 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Sat, 4 Jan 2014 20:40:34 +0800 Anthony Towns wrote: > Salut tout le monde, > > Some time ago (*cough* 2009), I had a play with working out how to > apply pdiffs more efficiently than apt currently does, and implemented > a proof of concept in python [0]. There weren't any replies (eve

Re: [RFH] !!SOS!! totally hosed init system

2014-01-04 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 08:07:08PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > If file-rc and/or the maintainer scripts somehow restored the links > > incorrectly, then insserv will ignore the header and preserve your > > customisations > > Hm. I can’t remember *e

Bug#734201: ITP: libbackpan-index-perl -- Perl interface to the BackPAN index

2014-01-04 Thread Stefan Hornburg (Racke)
Package: wnpp Owner: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libbackpan-index-perl Version : 0.42 Upstream Author : Michael G Schwern * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/BackPA

Re: [RFH] !!SOS!! totally hosed init system

2014-01-04 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, Roger Leigh wrote: > If file-rc and/or the maintainer scripts somehow restored the links > incorrectly, then insserv will ignore the header and preserve your > customisations Hm. I can’t remember *ever* doing *any* customisations. I normally just put an “exit 0” below the sheb

Re: Better pdiff handling for apt

2014-01-04 Thread David Kalnischkies
Hi, I had a go on this topic as well in early december, but got "distracted" which will be for a bit longer still, so just as a somewhat short reply: On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 08:40:34PM +0800, Anthony Towns wrote: > My patched apt source is up on github at: > >https://github.com/ajtowns/apt/t

Re: GnuTLS in Debian

2014-01-04 Thread Andreas Metzler
Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Andreas Metzler schrieb: >> #5 Declare GMP to be a system library. > (..) >> #5 was how Fedora looked at the OpenSSL library issue. Since Debian >> has another viewpoint on OpenSSL I somehow doubt we would use it for >> GMP. > We should do that (and also reevaluate th

Re: Removing packages from unofficial repositories

2014-01-04 Thread Arthur de Jong
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 12:52 -0500, Simon Ruggier wrote: > However, I would expect that most users would not have the patience to > do this via apt preferences, and if there is an easier way, I was not > aware of it. I also did this a few times. I remove the third-party repositories from sources.li

Re: Bug#733029: dpkg-buildpackage: disable signing by default (-us -uc should be the default)

2014-01-04 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Jonathan (2014.01.02_19:22:33_+0200) > > * having to support remote signing > > It would be fair enough to stderr "not supported, please use the older > tool in devscripts" and error 1 if such an argument was provided. That > would be pragmatic if (as I suspect) -r is rarely used. Aww. I'm a

Re: GnuTLS in Debian

2014-01-04 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op 23-12-13 23:43, Clint Adams schreef: > GPLv2-only folks should be made to see how their antisocial > behavior is harming everyone. I think this is a delightful > situation for them to be in. I am not a member of the church of GNU, nor do I wish to be. I respect Richard Stallman (and his band o

Re: [DEP 8] About "XS-Testsuite: autopkgtest": time to remove "XS-" ?

2014-01-04 Thread Guillem Jover
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 19:40:54 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Guillem Jover , 2014-01-03, 13:13: > >Given that you (at least) seemed to show opposition to the field > >(AFAIR), and that you've done an independent implementation of the > >runner; does 692704 mean that you changed mind? > > No, it jus

Re: Better pdiff handling for apt

2014-01-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 4 January 2014 12:40, Anthony Towns wrote: > Salut tout le monde, > > Some time ago (*cough* 2009), I had a play with working out how to > apply pdiffs more efficiently than apt currently does, and implemented > a proof of concept in python [0]. There weren't any replies (even a > "ooo, cool")

Re: Fwd: Re: several SIGSEGV bugs in debian 7/AMD64

2014-01-04 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op 28-12-13 21:52, René Kuligowski schreef: > Hi Adrian, > > > Thanks for your quick answer,… but (sounds like a pouting little boy, I > know): > Sorry, but I cannot file a bug report against, say, nvidia-glx, because > it is most likely not the cause. The problem is far more likely kernel > 3.x

Bug#734167: ITP: node-ansi-color-table -- Tables for console with ansi colors and formatting support - Node.js module

2014-01-04 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Jérémy Lal" * Package name: node-ansi-color-table Version : 0.0.3 Upstream Author : Quim Calpe * URL : https://github.com/quimcalpe/ansi-color-table * License : Expat Programming Lang: JavaScript Description : C

Re: Better pdiff handling for apt

2014-01-04 Thread Wookey
+++ Anthony Towns [2014-01-04 20:40 +0800]: > Salut tout le monde, > > Some time ago (*cough* 2009), I had a play with working out how to > apply pdiffs more efficiently than apt currently does, and implemented > a proof of concept in python [0]. There weren't any replies (even a > "ooo, cool")

Better pdiff handling for apt

2014-01-04 Thread Anthony Towns
Salut tout le monde, Some time ago (*cough* 2009), I had a play with working out how to apply pdiffs more efficiently than apt currently does, and implemented a proof of concept in python [0]. There weren't any replies (even a "ooo, cool") when I posted to the deity list, so I left it at that; tho

Re: GPLv2-only considered harmful [was Re: GnuTLS in Debian]

2014-01-04 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Sat, 04 Jan 2014 04:29:02 +0100, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 08:59:53AM -0600, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: >> > So your doomsday scenario is that if you license something >> > GPLv2+, someone might fork and modify it to be GPLv3+, >> >> I was under the impression tha

Re: [debian-mysql] Bug#732878: Add MariaDB as an alternative dependency

2014-01-04 Thread Marcin Kulisz
On 2013-12-27 01:13:15, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > 2013/12/25 Thomas Goirand : snip > > P.S: Do you know if the MariaDB package in Sid has the capability to run > > in cluster, like for Galera? > > No, but I might package MariaDB Galera Cluster later if I have time > and energy for additional pack