On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 09:44:51AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:39:46AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
> > I'd have to look at the RC bugs.
> >
> > I'm looking for a hard commitment here
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I think that if you focused on the compliance with the DFSG, t
Hi,
I have attached two patches for espeakedit:
0001-*.patch -- This makes espeakedit compile.
0002-*.patch -- This fixes a segfault when constructing the wxFont
objects for SpectFrame. These were being constructed in the global
namespace. With wxWidgets 3.0, it now requires a gtk+ window when
c
There was a nice bunch of (5-digit) bugs being closed with the removal,
they should be unarchived, reopened and handled properly if xemacs comes
back.
from https://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt:
=
[Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013
Hi,
I have attached two patches for espeakedit:
0001-*.patch -- This makes espeakedit compile.
0002-*.patch -- This fixes a segfault when constructing the wxFont
objects for SpectFrame. These were being constructed in the global
namespace. With wxWidgets 3.0, it now requires a gtk+ window when
c
Le Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:39:46AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
>
> I'd have to look at the RC bugs.
>
> I'm looking for a hard commitment here
Hi Paul,
I think that if you focused on the compliance with the DFSG, then the NEW queue
could empty quicker.
It is a big problem, and it is also
On 15 November 2013 12:02, Mark Brown wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Mark Brown
>
> * Package name: xemacs21
> Version : 21.4.22
> Upstream Author : XEmacs development team
> URL : http://www.xemacs.org/
> License : GPL
> Programming
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:50:05PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I'm not sure that making a general rule based on an edge-case is a
> good idea. Publican is not very popular at all, it's quite likely
> that none of the 70 or so people who have installed it have done
> anything unusual with moun
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Looking at publican a number of questions occur to me
>
> * why hardlink all of the contents of
>/usr/share/doc/publican/Users_Guide/desktop/$LOCALE/Common_Content
>together rather than symlink them to some common directory like
>/usr/sha
reassign 729659 upower
# if it affects upower those maintainer know better than the '"general"
# maintainers' what to do with this bug...
thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 729659 upower
Bug #729659 [general] general: problem with laptop suspend after dist-upgrade
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'upower'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #729659 to the same values
previously set
Igno
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:39:46AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > > Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
> > > bugs?
> > By m
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> I was on my phone, thanks for the advice.
I laboriously quote-post from my phone all the time. Emails should be
optimised for the reader, rather than the writer.
> No, I don't think it's wise to let this back in the archive befor
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> > Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
> > bugs?
>
> By making changes to the software.
This discussion is getting a tad too ant
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:25:16PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> > Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
> > bugs?
>
> By making changes to the software.
No need to CC me, I'm subscribed.
This
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:06:37AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Before you put this in NEW, how do you plan on fixing the outstanding RC
> bugs?
By making changes to the software.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:01:46PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:17:34AM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> Don't top post.
I was on my phone, thanks for the advice.
> > Out of curiosity, how do you plan on solving it's six rc bugs?
>
> Yes, of course. Well, the one
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:17:34AM -0500, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
Don't top post.
> Out of curiosity, how do you plan on solving it's six rc bugs?
Yes, of course. Well, the one that was there when I looked is fixed,
I'll see if the BTS tells me about any open ones after the reupload.
signa
Out of curiosity, how do you plan on solving it's six rc bugs?
On Nov 15, 2013 9:10 AM, "Mark Brown" wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:29:50PM +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > * Package name: xemacs21
> > > Version
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:29:50PM +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > * Package name: xemacs21
> > Version : 21.4.22
> Wasn't this removed just one month ago?
Yes, this is why I'm ITPing it.
signature.asc
Description: Di
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On 2013-11-15 8:32, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
>> On Jo, 14 nov 13, 12:39:04, Craig Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Please add expect-lite package to Squeeze & Wheezy
>>>
>> [...]
>
> Since you will be the Maintainer of the package I think you wanted to
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:39:07PM +0400, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
> As the latest packaged Subversion in Debian is now 1.8.4 and it seems
> that the maintainer doesn't care updating it by now (see
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725787),
A little over a month ago is not long e
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:16:19AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> For instance the publican package saved 3/4 of its binary package
> size. If this were a problem, then maybe we should have seen a bug
> report.
I'm not sure that making a general rule based on an edge-case is a
good idea. Publican
Hello,
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:42:18 +0100
Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > The tar file format supports hard links. Thus technically Debian
> > packages can contain hard links. A significant number of packages
> > including key packages such as bzip2, gzip, and ifupdown use this
> > technique. While sa
Hello,
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:19:17 +0100
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> The tar file format supports hard links. Thus technically Debian
> packages can contain hard links. A significant number of packages
> including key packages such as bzip2, gzip, and ifupdown use this
> technique. While same-direct
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> * Package name: xemacs21
> Version : 21.4.22
Wasn't this removed just one month ago?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725883
Berto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Brown
* Package name: xemacs21
Version : 21.4.22
Upstream Author : XEmacs development team
URL : http://www.xemacs.org/
License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, elisp
Description : highly customizable text edit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 729659 upower
Bug #729659 [general] general: problem with laptop suspend after dist-upgrade
Added indication that 729659 affects upower
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
729659: http
Package: general
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
After running apt-get dist-upgrade, my laptop does not suspend properly:
Problems:
1) key shortcut - used to work (standard shortcut, worked out of the box), now
instead suspending, it causes screen lock
2) menu option - used to be above power off
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:39:07PM +0400, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
> I've never tried to perform any package maintenance, but I would be very
> happy to contribute these packages to Debian... (NMU?)
>
> What are the next steps for it? Should someone (some maintainer?) review
> it?
Yes, someone n
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:11:27PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> So you save a small number of inodes, and get problems if the filesystem's
> layout is unconventional. Such savings don't seem to be worth the trouble
> to me.
I was questioning the existence of said trouble. I still do that. If the
On 2013-11-15 8:32, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 14 nov 13, 12:39:04, Craig Miller wrote:
Please add expect-lite package to Squeeze & Wheezy
[...]
Since you will be the Maintainer of the package I think you wanted to
file an ITP (Intent to Package) and not an RFP (Request to package).
Please p
Hello everyone!
As the latest packaged Subversion in Debian is now 1.8.4 and it seems
that the maintainer doesn't care updating it by now (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725787), I've recently
packaged svn 1.8.4 and serf 1.3.2 (which is needed by svn) by myself.
I've neve
On 14 November 2013 18:54, David Daney wrote:
> On 11/14/2013 03:31 AM, Graham Whaley wrote:
> [...]
>
> Hi David,
>> out of interest, do you know if there are any commercially (ideally
>> easily and cheaply ;-) available boards out there that can run Octeon
>> little endian?
>>
>
> I don't kn
On 14 November 2013 18:25, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Anybody can help to test whether the out current webkit workable?
>
> Maybe by install epiphany-browser and use it?
>
> All of my board/laptops are working as build nodes.
>
>
We'll see if we can run it up on our 3A laptop today. We've not modified
Control: reassign -1 wnpp
Control: retitle -1 ITP: expect-lite -- easy to use version of expect
Control: owner -1 Craig Miller
On Jo, 14 nov 13, 12:39:04, Craig Miller wrote:
> Package: expect-lite
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Please add expect-lite package to Squeeze & Wheezy
>
35 matches
Mail list logo