Re: [PATCH] netplug - Allow to specify custom script file via param '-s'

Hello, On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 22:37:01 +0100 Pali Rohár wrote: > Ok, here is info: Months ago I sent patch for package netplug to > ML. Someody wrote that I should send it to bugtracker. So I > posted it to [1]. I also sent that patch also to upstream > project, but no response. Even no response

Work-needing packages report for Nov 8, 2013

The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 540 (new: 5) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 155 (new: 3) Total number of packages request

Re: New ksh/ksh93 package, half the size, ten times the features!!!!

Thorsten Glaser mirbsd.de> writes: > No, it isn’t – but you could build-depend on mksh, if the script > can be run with it (haven’t tested it), possibly with a few changes OK, I’ve tried with the following patch: diff -Nru ksh-93v-20131010/debian/control ksh-93v-20131010/debian/control --- ksh-

Re: [PATCH] netplug - Allow to specify custom script file via param '-s'

On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 22:37:01 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Again, after month I have not got any responce. > > > CCing everybody from this thread. What to do? > > I'd say you got an "email problem". > > If I were the recpient of this email I wouldn't know what you > > were asking. > Ok, here is i

Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)

Am 29.10.2013 17:48, schrieb Ian Jackson: > (Mind you, I have my doubts about a process which counts people > promising to do work - it sets up some rather unfortunate incentives. > I guess it's easier to judge and more prospective than a process which > attempts to gauge whether the work has been

Bug#729014: ITP: libnet-dns-cloudflare-ddns-perl -- Object orientated Dynamic DNS interface

Package: wnpp Owner: Peter Roberts Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libnet-dns-cloudflare-ddns-perl Version : 0.05 Upstream Author : Peter Roberts * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Net-DNS-

Re: [PATCH] netplug - Allow to specify custom script file via param '-s'

On Thursday 07 November 2013 22:23:42 Craig Small wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 05:20:08PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Again, after month I have not got any responce. > > CCing everybody from this thread. What to do? > > I'd say you got an "email problem". > If I were the recpient of this emai

Re: [PATCH] netplug - Allow to specify custom script file via param '-s'

On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 05:20:08PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > Again, after month I have not got any responce. > CCing everybody from this thread. What to do? I'd say you got an "email problem". If I were the recpient of this email I wouldn't know what you were asking. I get lots of emails and look

Bug#728999: RFP: beaver -- Lightweight log shippper to logstash

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2013-11-07 X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name: Beaver Version : 30 Upstream Author : José Díaz-González URL : http://beaver.readthedocs.org/ License : MIT Description : Lightweight log shippper to

Re: [PATCH] netplug - Allow to specify custom script file via param '-s'

On Monday 16 September 2013 11:40:00 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 16 September 2013 00:35:52 Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:15:20AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Bump. Is there any problem? > > > > Hey there Pali, > > > > First of all, thank you for your hard work and pe

Re: New ksh/ksh93 package, half the size, ten times the features!!!!

Giovanni Rapagnani ideanet.be> writes: > - the script is executed using /usr/bin/ksh. Is it fine to have a build > dependency on the package we are about to build? If it is, the build No, it isn’t – but you could build-depend on mksh, if the script can be run with it (haven’t tested it), possibl

Re: prerm/postrm considered harmful in M-A: same packages

Hi! On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 14:34:11 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > I noticed a problem with several packages when they were migrated to > multiarch, and I’m afraid we have a pattern here. This was reported on this list some time ago:

Re: Debian HA team MIA?

Hi, On 17:22 Wed 06 Nov , Michael Meskes wrote: > Hi, > > I was just pointed to > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-ha-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714210 both of which > bring > up the question whether the team stil

prerm/postrm considered harmful in M-A: same packages

Hi, I noticed a problem with several packages when they were migrated to multiarch, and I’m afraid we have a pattern here. Here, libfoo is a Multi-Arch: same package. libfoo.postinst: → Generate /etc/libfoo.conf → Modify /etc/bar.conf to add libfoo support (think typically NSS modules) The pos

Re: Proposal: switch init system to systemd or upstart

25.10.2013 20:47, Martin Steigerwald wrote: [] #717731 upower: authentification is required for hibernating while other users are logged in http://bugs.debian.org/717731 #717554 systemd: authentification is required for hibernating while other users are logged in http://bugs.debian.org/717554 B