tony mancill writes:
> Thank you for pointing this out. I just recently uploaded a script,
> splitpatch, that I argued should be accepted as-is (i.e. as a "micro
> package") because of the dependency on ruby.
> Given that ruby is becoming more popular for scripting, what do folks
> think about
On 09/03/2013 02:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Vincent Danjean writes:
>
>> The fact is that the FTP team comment was correct: it is really a small
>> package. So, my question was really open (I do not know every package in
>> Debian), in case someone has a useful suggestion (that does not involve
On Mi, 04 Sep 2013, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> How much do those packages weigh, Norbert? Are TeX transitional
> packages particularly heavy?
In kg? In bit? In work time?
> I really don't know why you think TeX is exempt from the usual
> requirements to support clean upgrades between Debian releases
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 10:57 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Di, 03 Sep 2013, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > texlive-lang-european? It doesn't look like it to me (no Breaks or
> > Conflicts), but I haven't actually tried it.
>
> conflicts there are, texlive-base conflicts with all the old packages
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> texlive-lang-european? It doesn't look like it to me (no Breaks or
> Conflicts), but I haven't actually tried it.
conflicts there are, texlive-base conflicts with all the old packages.
TL2013 made big changes to the naming of packages. If I go down
th
> > Sounds like you are saying 'texlive-lang-danish' is only useful as a
> > package dependency - in other words, users would never install it
> > explicitly because they want its functionality. Is that correct? This
[Norbert Preining]
> I never said that. The functionality is now in
> te
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Sounds like you are saying 'texlive-lang-danish' is only useful as a
> package dependency - in other words, users would never install it
> explicitly because they want its functionality. Is that correct? This
I never said that. The functionality is no
On Aug 31, 2013, at 01:37 AM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>In the end, this meant that using UDD had some minor benefits (a richer
>history, and theoretical improved merge support)
I'd argue that they were more than minor benefits!
>but there were a number of extra things you had to watch out for tha
[Norbert Preining]
> I understood your proposal, of course. Still, since there are no rdepends
> besides very few (1?) build-depends on these two packages, I consider
> it a a waste of resources.
Sounds like you are saying 'texlive-lang-danish' is only useful as a
package dependency - in other w
Hi David,
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, David Prévot wrote:
> I was directly proposing that, instead of silently removing the
> texlive-lang-danish — and at least texlive-lang-norwegian — binary
> packages, they could be added back as dummy transitional packages
I understood your proposal, of course. Still
Vincent Danjean writes:
> The fact is that the FTP team comment was correct: it is really a small
> package. So, my question was really open (I do not know every package in
> Debian), in case someone has a useful suggestion (that does not involve
> to rewrite the script).
moreutils is another po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi again,
Le 03/09/2013 03:37, Norbert Preining a écrit :
> On Di, 03 Sep 2013, David Prévot wrote:
>> if you’re in a hurry to see your package reach testing,
>> feel free to provide back the binary packages you removed (via
>> convenient dummy tra
Le 03/09/2013 18:26, Andrey Rahmatullin a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:21:50PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>> btw - even on Debian systems it is not:
>> $> ldd /usr/lib/libgsl.so
>> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7fff5fddb000)
>> libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-
It would probably more helpful to approach our release team asking for
advice how to proceed with transition than sending this blunt rant into d-d.
O.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear maintainers of debian-edu-doc, all of d-d
>
> [short explanation for d-d: debian
Le 03/09/2013 14:50, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:31:35PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> So, I'm looking for a package that would accept this ruby script
>> (I will probably ask linux-util anyway if nobody has other suggestions)
>> and I will keep it in my perso repos
On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 13:02 -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
> This provides integrity protection and last-mile confidentiality to
> images, thus preventing a local network attacker from seeing the images
> you request (allowing for possible disclosure of the content you're
> viewing) or changing their
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Luke Faraone wrote:
> Camo is all about making insecure assets look secure. This is an SSL
> image proxy to prevent mixed content warnings on secure pages.
Is distributing software that pretends it is secure a good idea?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulW
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:21:50PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../lib/libgsl.so: undefined
> > > reference to `cblas_ztrsv'
> > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../lib/libgsl.so: undefined
> > > reference to `cblas_scasum'
> > If y
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > ~/afni-0.20130830~dfsg.1/build-x86_64-linux-gnu/avovk# gcc --param
> > ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat-security -g -O2
> > -fstack-protector
> > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wno-unused
> > -fopenm
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:42:32AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> ~/afni-0.20130830~dfsg.1/build-x86_64-linux-gnu/avovk# gcc --param
> ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat-security -g -O2
> -fstack-protector
> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wno-unused
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luke Faraone
* Package name: camo
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Rick Olson and Cory Donohoe
* URL : https://github.com/atmos/camo
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript (nodejs)
Description : SSL image
Hi Everyone,
Though it is actually not a Debian specific question (since on pure
Debian builts/links fine), I hope to find help and wisdom here.
We (neurodebian) have a package for AFNI which we have been cooking for a
while... with a recent change to force -Wl,--no-undefined I got into a weird
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Tue, 03 Sep 2013, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>> 2013/9/3 Paul Wise :
>> > Reading Charles' mail I had a thought; how about accepting buggy
>> > packages (unless the issues make them non-distributable) and file RC
>> > and other bugs if there are DFSG or other issues?
>>
>
Package: wnpp
Owner: Bas Couwenberg
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libpg-hstore-perl
Version : 1.03
Upstream Author : Galimov Albert
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Pg-hstore/
* License
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I stopped reading after reading the subject.
Thanks for the helpful comment instead of fixing things.
Norbert
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.in
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 2013/9/3 Paul Wise :
> > Reading Charles' mail I had a thought; how about accepting buggy
> > packages (unless the issues make them non-distributable) and file RC
> > and other bugs if there are DFSG or other issues?
>
> Although this could be possible,
Hey Charles,
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 05:43:52PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> first of all, please let me clarify that the reason why I answered on our core
> mailing list is not to fingerpoint if or not you are wrong, but becase this is
> the only way I have to see if others agree
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-couleur
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Gabriel Falcão
* URL : https://github.com/gabrielfalcao/couleur
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : tool t
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:31:35PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Le 03/09/2013 11:52, Paul Wise a écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> >
> >> Never mind. My current problem is that I have no idea which current
> >> package to contact to ask for a inclusion. It
Paul Wise wrote:
>Reading Charles' mail I had a thought; how about accepting buggy
>packages (unless the issues make them non-distributable) and file RC
>and other bugs if there are DFSG or other issues?
Why should we rush to let more broken stuff into the archive?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge,
Le 03/09/2013 11:52, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>
>> Never mind. My current problem is that I have no idea which current
>> package to contact to ask for a inclusion. It is not important enough
>> to be included in packages such as util-linux an
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 05:09:22PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> How you can help (NEW-TEST-HELP)
>
>
> Add tests to your packages. The full specification for these tests
> are available from [AUTOPKG]. If you need inspiration, consider looking
> at some of the e
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-sure
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Gabriel Falcao
* URL : https://github.com/gabrielfalcao/sure
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : utility belt for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-steadymark
Version : 0.4.5
Upstream Author : Gabriel Falcao
* URL : https://github.com/gabrielfalcao/steadymark
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : markdow
2013/9/3 Paul Wise :
> Reading Charles' mail I had a thought; how about accepting buggy
> packages (unless the issues make them non-distributable) and file RC
> and other bugs if there are DFSG or other issues?
Although this could be possible, a second upload would be needed
anyway (hopefully in a
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Never mind. My current problem is that I have no idea which current
> package to contact to ask for a inclusion. It is not important enough
> to be included in packages such as util-linux and few (no?) system/devel
> packages already have
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-misaka
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Frank Smit
* URL : http://misaka.61924.nl/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : binding for Sundown, a markdown pars
Reading Charles' mail I had a thought; how about accepting buggy
packages (unless the issues make them non-distributable) and file RC
and other bugs if there are DFSG or other issues?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.or
Dear Norbert,
I stopped reading after reading the subject.
Not sure if you get why, oh, my.
I'll give you a little hint:
always assume the worst,
spread the word,
and for maximum impact,
put names in subject too.
This really really helps and is super joyful.
cheers,
Holger
signature.a
Le 02/09/2013 06:12, Paul R. Tagliamonte a écrit :
> Respectfully - when we add micro (under Size 100 packages) the amount of
> metadata added to every mirror and every users machine is almost as much as
> the package contents.
>
> This is a very common request (make sure this really needs to be
(Long answer, but I promise to limit my messages in this thread).
Le Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 01:08:12PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
>
> Yes. For the record, this day when Charles sent this mail, I was working
> in NEW from early in the morning to about 9:00 at night. I don't want
> thanks or e
Hi David,
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, David Prévot wrote:
> Absolutely not, a fixed d-e-d package will be uploaded in due time. In
> the mean time, if you’re in a hurry to see your package reach testing,
> feel free to provide back the binary packages you removed (via
> convenient dummy transitional packa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Norbert,
Le 03/09/2013 02:10, Norbert Preining a écrit :
> Are you planning to block TeX Live transition for unforeseeable future?
Absolutely not, a fixed d-e-d package will be uploaded in due time. In
the mean time, if you’re in a hurry to see
43 matches
Mail list logo
