anatoly techtonik gmail.com> writes:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/python-pyftpdlib/
trunk/debian/watch?r1=13515&r2=13521
I think that got fixed in a post-release subversion update.
But it can also be worked around by patching FusionForge’s
copy of the ViewVC code. R
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Bernat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: snmpsim
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Ilya Etingof
* URL : http://snmpsim.sourceforge.net/
* License : 2-clause BSD
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kouhei Maeda
* Package name: backup2swift
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Kouhei Maeda
* URL : https://github.com/mkouhei/backup2swift
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : backup data to OpenSta
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kouhei Maeda
* Package name: swiftsc
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Kouhei Maeda
* URL : https://github.com/mkouhei/swiftsc
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : simple client library of OpenSta
This paper just came out:
http://eprint.iacr.org/2013/448.pdf
It's quite exciting, really. In summary, by running another process
which maps the gnupg executable and plays tricks to detect L3 cache
fills, they can recover the private key used in a gnupg signature
operation.
This is a threat in
On Sunday 21 April 2013 13:23:49 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > But why Debian cannot review and include this my patch?
>
> Now is the time for fixing RC bugs, not for including patches,
> please wait until wheezy is released and then give the
> maintaine
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:55:18PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 26.07.2013 15:35, schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > BTW, it would have been perceived even without the unfriendly tenor. In
> > case you might not know the team is maintaining a wide range of packages
> > and so there is n
Am 26.07.2013 15:35, schrieb Andreas Tille:
> BTW, it would have been perceived even without the unfriendly tenor. In
> case you might not know the team is maintaining a wide range of packages
> and so there is not always a need to know about specific Fortran issues.
well, apparently you did perc
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 02:37:15PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 25.07.2013 14:25, schrieb Michael Banck:
> > What to do about the compatibilty is a different matter, did this come
> > up before?
>
> looks like one hand in the debian-science team doesn't know what the other
> ha
Am 25.07.2013 14:25, schrieb Michael Banck:
> What to do about the compatibilty is a different matter, did this come
> up before?
looks like one hand in the debian-science team doesn't know what the other hands
are doing ...
See #714730, even on the debian-science ML.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
10 matches
Mail list logo