Le Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 11:05:29AM -0700, Clint Byrum a écrit :
>
> These patches, by and large should not require duplication. If you
> look, some of the arm support patches happened in Fedora, not
> Ubuntu. Now, I think I might scold my colleagues in Ubuntu for not
> annotating their patches wit
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> You point out a limitation that I'd consider to be a feature. My
> proposal requires that every package has a single set of running
> architectures that has to apply to all code contained.
Should that "set of running architectures" be just "architecture"?
I think that after
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Felix Crux
* Package name: gti
Version : 1.0.4+1
Upstream Author : Richard Wossal
* URL : http://r-wos.org/hacks/gti
* License : Old-Style MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : Animates a car and launches git if
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antoine Musso
* Package name: zuul
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : OpenStack
* URL : http://ci.openstack.org/zuul/
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: Python
Description : zuul - a project gating system
Zuul
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 05:42:52PM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 04:44:08AM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> > > 3) P runs a script using system interpreter X, and depends on the
> > >interpreter environment supporting functionality provided by Q.
> > >
On 20 April 2013 12:37, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> I came across this on Planet Debian
>
> http://rb.doesntexist.org/blog//posts/lack_of_cooperation_from_ubuntu/
>
> I'm guessing that Ubuntu may not have pushed the changes to sid because
> of the freeze, that may well be the answer to Rogério's qu
On 2013-04-20 04:37, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I came across this on Planet Debian
http://rb.doesntexist.org/blog//posts/lack_of_cooperation_from_ubuntu/
I'm guessing that Ubuntu may not have pushed the changes to sid
because
of the freeze, that may well be the answer to Rogério's questions.
Th
Honorable
Pour tout commencer je m'excuse de vous avoir adressé ce message sans votre
consentement, je vous adresse ce message pour discuter d'affaire avec vous,
mais je ne sais pas quelle sera votre réaction à ma proposition. Je travaille
actuellement comme un auditeur externe avec une banque
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-frei0r
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : https://github.com/savonet/ocaml-frei0r
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bind
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis
* Package name: ocaml-opus
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : The Savonet Team
* URL : https://github.com/savonet/ocaml-opus
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : OCaml bindings to
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 04:44:08AM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> > 3) P runs a script using system interpreter X, and depends on the
> >interpreter environment supporting functionality provided by Q.
> >Q needs to work for the arch matching installed version of X.
>
>
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 04:44:08AM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> It seems correct at first glance, but not enough to solve all the issues
> mentioned. Currently existing package relationships lack information
> that is necessary to do the right thing in all cases. Consider different
> kinds of depend
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Nonetheless, with derivatives and Debian itself having different release
> cycles, and wearing my upstream developer hat, I can't help wondering:
> how can upstreams ensure that the freshest versions of their package
> propagate to the deriva
I came across this on Planet Debian
http://rb.doesntexist.org/blog//posts/lack_of_cooperation_from_ubuntu/
I'm guessing that Ubuntu may not have pushed the changes to sid because
of the freeze, that may well be the answer to Rogério's questions.
Nonetheless, with derivatives and Debian itself h
14 matches
Mail list logo
