On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:23:45PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> If your script does require some feature that is not available in mawk
> or original-awk, you explicitly need to call gawk, since /usr/bin/awk is
> an alternative and you cannot assume that it will point to gawk.
I wonder, would a
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:36:05PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> [Asking Patricio to write in English and look at the Debian mentors site]
He isn't interested in maintaining this software in Debian.
Hola Patricio,
Por favor, lee http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.es.html la parte de
"petición d
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:59:14AM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:23:45 +
> "brian m. carlson" wrote:
>
> > I've seen a lot of cases over the years of packages depending on gawk
> > that do not need it. If you only need a standard nawk (new awk), you
> > do not need to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Stapelberg
* Package name: kanla
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Michael Stapelberg
* URL : http://kanla.zekjur.net/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : small-scale alerting daemon
kanla
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-happybase
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Wouter Bolsterlee
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/happybase/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : developer-fr
5 matches
Mail list logo