On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:25:47PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Another way to look at it is the number of maintainers, as recorded in
> the Packages and Sources files. I've done a bit of scripting and came
> with these numbers:
Did you look only at Maintainer, or also at Uploaders? In the for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sylvestre Ledru
* Package name: scalasca
Version : 1.4.2
Upstream Author : Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
* URL : http://www.scalasca.org/
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : Scalable p
Le Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:20:39AM +0200, olivier sallou a écrit :
>
> But I really like the idea of sending a binary build that is dropped by the
> build system. It would avoid sending "accidently" (or not) a package that
> does not build at all and uses resources (servers, ...) effortless.
Hi O
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 19:18:07 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> As I agree with Christian that the most important factor is our ability
> to attract contributors, I've tried to gather data about the number of
> people that decide to join Debian per year. The easiest data to found
> was those about
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:33:36PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> Isn't that what "LSB" is meant to provide?
I guess it is, but as far as I understand, it kind of fails on the point
"is actually widely adopted by the community". Unfortunately.
> Besides that is suffers from another type of fragm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Filippo Rusconi
* Package name: openms
Version : 1.9.0
Upstream Author : Oliver Kohlbacher
* URL : http://open-ms.sourceforge.net
* License : (Artistic)
Programming Lang: (C++)
Description : software suite for L
Le dimanche, 21 octobre 2012 19.33:28, Enrico Zini a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:26:56PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > generalisation of application stores. How can we attract the creative
> > people who entered the field of software development and distribution on
> > Android or iOS ?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 07:33:28PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> We won't attract the people you're looking at, until we can actually
> come up with a standard, cross-distro toolchain that:
>
> - is actually useful to build games, UIs, whatever you want people to
>build;
> - provides an API[1]
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:26:56PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> generalisation of application stores. How can we attract the creative people
> who entered the field of software development and distribution on Android or
> iOS ?
> Worse, because of the fragmentation of the « Linux » landscape, i
Arno Töll debian.org> writes:
> Pretending we had a working concept to throw away binaries and how to
> deal with arch:all packages, why don't we introduce a control/changes
> file flag similar in spirit to "XS-Autobuild: yes" instructing dak not
> to throw away binaries upon explicit request - s
On Friday 19 October 2012 00:53:43 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Another reason could be, that people have problems with the BTS.
> Don't get me wrong, I personally like it a lot... and I wouldn't want to
> have e.g. launchpad (if at all,... I'm quite a bugzilla fan)... but
> especially for end
* Joerg Jaspert:
> The most important is being able to deal with arch all packages. And
> worse - arch all packages able to build only on certain
> architectures.
Could we instruct the buildd for the upload architecture to build
arch-all packages, and let the others operate as before? This shoul
* Steve Langasek:
> I am aware that other such packages exist. I just don't think we should
> support them if they can't be bootstrapped properly.
Ocaml is in this category as well, and it addresses it by
bootstrapping off an upstream-provided binary blob. I'm not sure if
this is the right appr
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:16:24AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > There are two main arguments: "why should we upload binaries if they will
> > be discarded anyway" and "if we allow source-only uploads people will
> > upload packages that weren't tested to be buildable".
> > Please don't repeat t
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 06:29:50PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Chow Loong Jin [121020 18:10]:
> > The only argument I have seen for binary uploads is to ensure that DDs have
> > built the package prior to uploading it. But as someone else pointed out
> > earlier
> > in the thread, we seem
15 matches
Mail list logo
