Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
* Package name: erlang-proper
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Manolis Papadakis
Eirini Arvaniti
Kostis Sagonas
* URL : https://github.com/manopapad/proper.git
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
* Package name: erlang-cherly
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : Cliff Moon, Yoshiyuki Kanno
* URL : https://www.github.com/leo-project/cherly.git
Original upstream is https://github.com/clif
Quoting Michael Hanke (m...@debian.org):
> I'm on an Intel SSD (120GB) since Aug 2009 -- running Debian testing all
> the time. I do not upgrade daily, but often. I have _not_ done any of
> the optimizations mentioned on the wiki. I have on average approx 15GB
> free on the drive. Obviously, I ran
reassign 689381 gdm3
thanks
Package: general
Severity: important
After booting into Debian 6.0.6 the login screen fails to appear. This is an
intermittant problem.
I still hear the sound associated with the login screen and can interact with
it (eg enter my password and log in) but the screen itself is not visible. The
only
The newest sip4 release, 4.14 increases the API version to 9.0. Since it has
potential incompatibilities, I've uploaded it to Experimental so maintainers
of rdepends can investigate if changes are needed. I hope to land this in
unstable very shortly after Wheezy is released.
There are a few p
Le Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:00:54PM +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> * Michael Tautschnig , 2012-10-01, 14:25:
> >>By policy, blank lines separate paragraphs, comments are
> >>discarded, so we end up with an empty first paragraph. Policy,
> >>however, requires that the *first* paragraph contains essent
> Le lundi 01 octobre 2012 à 14:43 +0100, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> > This wouldn't help people doing backports or whatever. I think this
> > should be fixed in the packages involved.
>
> Changing gnome-pkg-tools to replace the blank line with an empty comment
> is trivial. In unstable.
>
> How d
* Michael Tautschnig , 2012-10-01, 14:25:
By policy, blank lines separate paragraphs, comments are discarded,
so we end up with an empty first paragraph. Policy, however, requires
that the *first* paragraph contains essential package information
(Policy 5.2).
I'm not convinced by this interpr
]] Vincent Bernat
> In case of ext4 over encrypted LVM, does the kernel have all the
> discard/trim support? The Debian wiki says that LVM supports trim to
> declare unused space with lvresize as an example. Does it include unused
> space inside a logical volume?
Yes, but you need to enable it e
Le lundi 01 octobre 2012 à 14:43 +0100, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> This wouldn't help people doing backports or whatever. I think this
> should be fixed in the packages involved.
Changing gnome-pkg-tools to replace the blank line with an empty comment
is trivial. In unstable.
How does that help wi
> "Frank" == Frank Bauer writes:
Frank> Hi, I am considering migrating my Debian testing system to a
Frank> SSD to speed things up. Since SSD lifetime is severely
Frank> limited (about 5000 overwrites for consumer grade MLC), I
Frank> wanted to know beforehand, how much write
❦ 1 octobre 2012 18:26 CEST, Jonathan McDowell :
>> what are the main (ssd related) advantages of running a 3.2 kernel
>> instead of the 2.6.32 from squeeze? (I don't want to run 3.2 due to
>> wlan/intel gfx problems, though last time I tried was three months
>> ago, might been fixed by now.)
>
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:37:19PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Montag, 1. Oktober 2012, Michael Hanke wrote:
> > Just a data point:
>
> interesting, thanks.
>
> what are the main (ssd related) advantages of running a 3.2 kernel
> instead of the 2.6.32 from squeeze? (I don't want to run 3.2
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 02:25:36PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> - the problem affects all packages *build-depending* on gnome-pkg-tools, thus
> I'd actually have to do an MBF (it's more than 160 packages)
It would be worth looking at a) whether those 160 packages have a common
maintainer,
Michael Tautschnig writes ("Comments+blank line in debian/control:
Clarification in policy or MBF?"):
> Taking a pragmatic position, it would be best to have policy acknowledge the
> fact that empty paragraphs don't count, and get the parser in pbuilder fixed.
This wouldn't help people doing back
Hi,
On Montag, 1. Oktober 2012, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Just a data point:
interesting, thanks.
what are the main (ssd related) advantages of running a 3.2 kernel instead of
the 2.6.32 from squeeze? (I don't want to run 3.2 due to wlan/intel gfx
problems, though last time I tried was three mon
Hi,
While rebuilding our archive using pbuilder I noticed that all packages
build-depending on gnome-pkg-tools failed to build. That led me to filing
#684503, which I'll quote here for convenience:
| The file control.header ends with an empty blank line. As the contents of that
| file is prepende
On 2012-10-01 13:32, Frank Bauer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:23:32AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>>
>> Have you done any actual calculation on this? A quick Google search on SSD
>> write
>> cycles shows more articles debunking this theory than supporting it.
>
> Reading specifications of
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:23:32AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 30/09/2012 18:49, Frank Bauer wrote:
> > Why not, my computer upgrade cycles are about 6-8 years and the
> > computer won't be idling all the time - especially considering modern
> > desktop environments running whole database eng
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:27:04PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Wookey wrote:
> > Thibg's final report gives a useful summary:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/2012/08/msg2.html
> > and this blog post gives some more details:
> > http://gsoc.sitedethib.co
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:23:32AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>
> Have you done any actual calculation on this? A quick Google search on SSD
> write
> cycles shows more articles debunking this theory than supporting it.
Reading specifications of intel's SSD 320 line at the following link:
http
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:34:18PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> I've been attempting to use multi-arch for cross-building packages
> for raspbian (a debian derivative I am working on for armv6
> hardfloat) and run into a few things which I thought i'd share
> and/or ask about.
Great!
I'm busy with
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:29:00PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sonntag, 30. September 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
> > * We are effectively ruling out opinions of non-members. That's bizarre,
> > since we allow them to maintain (and even "hijack") packages.
>
> No, we d/won't allow non-members to
Hi,
On Sonntag, 30. September 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
> * We are effectively ruling out opinions of non-members. That's bizarre,
> since we allow them to maintain (and even "hijack") packages.
No, we d/won't allow non-members to hijack packages. We probably will allow
them to salvage packages OT
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Wookey wrote:
> It's possible, but some more is still needed to have them built by the
> normal buildds. Wanna-build needs support for cross-arch dependencies;
> that's not been done yet. Splitting (multiarching) libc++-dev is also
> needed to build the g++ cross-co
+++ Wookey [2012-10-01 11:14 +0100]:
> +++ Paul Wise [2012-10-01 17:42 +0800]:
> >
> > I'd like to see cross-toolchains in sid before wheezy is out, is that
> > going to be possible?
Sorry - meant to say, that whilst we should definately have a go at
this in experiemental, the libsdtc++ changes n
+++ Paul Wise [2012-10-01 17:42 +0800]:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:34 PM, peter green wrote:
>
> > I've been attempting to use multi-arch for cross-building packages for
> > raspbian (a debian derivative I am working on for armv6 hardfloat) and run
> > into a few things which I thought i'd share
Hi there,
I happened upon your collection of college and career web resources for
prospective students here
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1998/09/msg00565.html and thought you
might be interested in another authoritative online resource to add to those.
Are you the correct person to co
Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun
and profit: A proposal"):
> I just meant that if we encourage to post seconds (which are in fact
> just a form of review of the intention to orphan) on a list such as -qa
> (which is more specific-purpose than, say, -d
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:34 PM, peter green wrote:
> I've been attempting to use multi-arch for cross-building packages for
> raspbian (a debian derivative I am working on for armv6 hardfloat) and run
> into a few things which I thought i'd share and/or ask about.
I'd like to see cross-toolchai
On 01/10/12 09:51, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I've had an NMU in the past for a package when I had a little less time,
> but the change was sound and correct. So I didn't bother to make an
> (empty) MU just to acknowledge it - I think that should be OK and not
> 'punished' by taking it as a sign of a
Hello,
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:22:01 +0200
Luca Bruno wrote:
> * URL : http://www.rust-lang.org/
> * License : MIT
> Programming Lang: C/C++, Rust
> Description : a safe, concurrent, practical language
Oh, please, please package it! It seems like it's very interesting
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 10:51:22 +0200
"Thijs Kinkhorst" wrote:
> Hi Arno,
>
> Thanks for this initiative. It seems like a useful guideline.
>
> > * A previous NMU was not acknowledged, and at least another issue
> > justifying another NMU is pending for /one month/ [5].
>
> I was wondering what 'a
Le Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:51:22AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
>
> I was wondering what 'acknowledging an NMU' means nowadays. Of course, we
> all used this term from the time that NMU's did not close bugs in the BTS
> and therefore needed to be explicitly acknowledged by an MU. However,
> si
Hi Arno,
Thanks for this initiative. It seems like a useful guideline.
> * A previous NMU was not acknowledged, and at least another issue
> justifying another NMU is pending for /one month/ [5].
I was wondering what 'acknowledging an NMU' means nowadays. Of course, we
all used this term from th
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 00:28:15 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> I tend to think that a re-build (via binNMU or otherwise) will
> be sufficient for most of the packages affected.
>
> Unless there'll be objections, I'm going to file the respective
> bug reports regarding the v
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 01:05:11AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > Build-depends installation: apt-get build-dep is fine if you are
> > building an unmodified package from a repo but it's of no use if you
> > have modified the build-dependencies to make them satisfiable.
>
> Annoying isn't it? This
On 01/10/12 07:51, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Now that we have well working bind mounts, we could actually deprecate
> [sysadmins moving directories to a less full filesystem and leaving
> symlinks behind] and just tell people to use bind mounts instead. At
least
> if our non-Linux ports has decent
39 matches
Mail list logo
