On Thursday, September 13, 2012 02:51:41 AM Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hey.
>
> Apart from the question whether this RFC is anyhow reasonable...
>
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 08:55 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Category: Best Current Practice
>
> Can a BCP deprecate stuff which is standard
Hey.
Apart from the question whether this RFC is anyhow reasonable...
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 08:55 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Category: Best Current Practice
Can a BCP deprecate stuff which is standardised by RFCs from the
standards track?
Cheers,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME crypt
On 13 September 2012 00:55, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to share with you the recently published RFC 6648, which
> deprecates the use of "X-" prefixes in "application protocols"
>
> BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
>
> Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)P. Saint-
Dear all,
I would like to share with you the recently published RFC 6648, which
deprecates the use of "X-" prefixes in "application protocols"
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)P. Saint-Andre
Request for Comments: 6648 Cisco
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:47:38PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In short, I would like to describe environment variables that
> can modify the behavior of a library.
> How should I name the manpage ? libXX ? libXX.so ? libXX.so.1 ? XX ?
I think libXX is preferable (allows for the p
Vincent Danjean, le Wed 12 Sep 2012 22:47:38 +0200, a écrit :
> In short, I would like to describe environment variables that
> can modify the behavior of a library.
> How should I name the manpage ? libXX ? libXX.so ? libXX.so.1 ? XX ?
I'd say libXX.so, like we have ld.so.
Samuel
--
To UNSU
Hi,
In short, I would like to describe environment variables that
can modify the behavior of a library.
How should I name the manpage ? libXX ? libXX.so ? libXX.so.1 ? XX ?
In which section should I put this manpage ? (7 ?)
Note that I do not want to describe the API of the library.
With mo
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:11:54PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> I am forwarding this as a remider that, should we ever get to the point of
> moving around /lib or /usr/lib, /sbin or /usr/sbin, and /bin or /usr/sbin,
> as well as any other such trunks, we really ought to consider whet
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 12 septembre 2012 à 11:03 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
>> Isn't the whole concept of "default desktop" just a matter of "which
>> desktop is included on CD1"? Are you proposing that Debian switches to a
>> series of "CD1s" (Deb
I am forwarding this as a remider that, should we ever get to the point of
moving around /lib or /usr/lib, /sbin or /usr/sbin, and /bin or /usr/sbin,
as well as any other such trunks, we really ought to consider whether we
should be using symlinks or bind mounts [where possible] for such moves.
Al
Hi:
On 12/09/12 16:36, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
On 12/09/2012 15:53, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Claiming that ``What is on CD1 is really anecdotic, since most people use (or
should
use) the netinst'' really sounds as claim of a newbie who has never installed
Debian
on a computer. So do not be
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:45:07 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 07:11:20PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > like calls because system does not return the number of files.
> > I'm attaching a small example that uses File::Find for this purpose.
> Do I understand you correctl
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.69+squeeze2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
as it was requested on debian-devel (for instance in[1]) an option to
influence the compression method when a repackaging is done by uscan
(either by using --repack option or when regarding the Files-Excluded
field i
On 2012-09-12 16:51:35 +0200 (+0200), Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Still it needs to ship a changelog.gz. Which it doesn't.
[...]
Agreed, and someone's already filed a bug on the missing metadata
bits.
--
{ IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); WWW(http://fungi.yuggoth.org/); PGP(43495829);
WHOIS(STANL3-ARIN); SMTP(fu
On 2012-09-12 16:04:02 +0200 (+0200), Emmanuel Kasper wrote:
>> After doing an upgrade from debian 6 to 7, the packge xmess-sdl is
>> list as installed but does not contains any file at all.
[...]
> According to the package description, xmess-sdl is now a
transitional dummy package depending on th
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:17:05PM +, The Fungi wrote:
> According to the package description, xmess-sdl is now a
> transitional dummy package depending on the new mess package. In
> fact, the unrelated bug report you linked even mentions that. This
> is how package renames are generally suppos
Hi,
Le 12/09/2012 10:04, Emmanuel Kasper a écrit :
> I don't see anything suspicious in /var/log/dpkg.log, I have no clues
> about what could cause that or where to get a debug mode. Where shoud I
> look for ?
Look at similar bug reports e.g.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6856
On 12/09/2012 15:53, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Claiming that ``What is on CD1 is really anecdotic, since most people use (or
> should
> use) the netinst'' really sounds as claim of a newbie who has never installed
> Debian
> on a computer. So do not be surprised to get newbie like responses.
> Othe
On 2012-09-12 16:04:02 +0200 (+0200), Emmanuel Kasper wrote:
> After doing an upgrade from debian 6 to 7, the packge xmess-sdl is
> list as installed but does not contains any file at all.
[...]
According to the package description, xmess-sdl is now a
transitional dummy package depending on the ne
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Abaakouk
* Package name: python-swiftclient
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Openstack
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/python-swiftclient
* License : Apache-2
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Cl
Hello
After doing an upgrade from debian 6 to 7, the packge xmess-sdl is list
as installed but does not contains any file at all.
( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685470 )
(s2w)root@dakar:/# dpkg -L xmess-sdl
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/xmess-sdl
/usr/share/
On 12/09/12 13:38, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 12 septembre 2012 à 12:40 +0200, Jerome BENOIT a écrit :
What does it happen when no internet connection is available (no access to
internet,
no supported driver for the net card) ?
This case is certainly as anecdotic as CD1, but somehow
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:03:33PM +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> Let's acknowledge that the gnome-* prefix means "to be used mostly in
> the GNOME Desktop environment" and not "officially endorsed by GNOME".
> Or something like that.
We need to distinguish between what the situation is no
On Mi, 12 sep 12, 13:34:38, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 12 septembre 2012 à 13:39 +0300, Andrei POPESCU a écrit :
> > Assuming a user that has no idea what Gnome/KDE/Xfce/LXDE or even a
> > "Desktop Environment" is, what should happen if the user makes no choice
> > at all?
>
> What w
Wookey writes:
> And navit and marble and foxtrotGPS and gpsdrive and viking and
> gpxviewer and memphis.
Hey you forgot monav :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://list
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:34:38PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 12 septembre 2012 à 13:39 +0300, Andrei POPESCU a écrit :
> > Assuming a user that has no idea what Gnome/KDE/Xfce/LXDE or even a
> > "Desktop Environment" is, what should happen if the user makes no choice
> > at al
Le mercredi 12 septembre 2012 à 12:40 +0200, Jerome BENOIT a écrit :
> What does it happen when no internet connection is available (no access to
> internet,
> no supported driver for the net card) ?
> This case is certainly as anecdotic as CD1, but somehow in this situation CD1
> can be very use
Le mercredi 12 septembre 2012 à 13:39 +0300, Andrei POPESCU a écrit :
> Assuming a user that has no idea what Gnome/KDE/Xfce/LXDE or even a
> "Desktop Environment" is, what should happen if the user makes no choice
> at all?
What we have now: a sensible default.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouett
+++ Tzafrir Cohen [2012-09-12 10:32 +]:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:28:16AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:45:42AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > also sprach Luca Capello [2012.09.09.2029 +0200]:
> > > > Or, if this is tightened to OSM, 'gnome-osm-maps'.
> > >
Hi!
bacula-director-pgsql package has a bug #605449 - package can be setup
after postgresql installation and dbconfig-common fail to configure
database.
I try to see, how this problem solved in other packages and can't find
answer. For example, roundcube-mysql, cacti, drupal6 not affected this
bu
On 12/09/12 12:16, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 12 septembre 2012 à 11:03 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
Isn't the whole concept of "default desktop" just a matter of "which
desktop is included on CD1"? Are you proposing that Debian switches to a
series of "CD1s" (Debian Ghome Edition, D
On Mi, 12 sep 12, 12:16:50, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> So the real question is being able to choose the desktop from the
> installer instead of having to pre-seed this choice.
Assuming a user that has no idea what Gnome/KDE/Xfce/LXDE or even a
"Desktop Environment" is, what should happen if the
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:28:16AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:45:42AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Luca Capello [2012.09.09.2029 +0200]:
> > > Or, if this is tightened to OSM, 'gnome-osm-maps'.
> >
> > except the 'm' on "osm" is already a "map", so may
Le mercredi 12 septembre 2012 à 11:03 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
> Isn't the whole concept of "default desktop" just a matter of "which
> desktop is included on CD1"? Are you proposing that Debian switches to a
> series of "CD1s" (Debian Ghome Edition, Debian KDE Edition, Debian XFCE
> Edition
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:02:28AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Wookey wrote:
>
> > I'd be happy if xfce was the default.
>
> I would be happy if we threw away the concept of a "default desktop"
> and left that choice to people who do installs or downloading of live
Paul Wise (12/09/2012):
> I would be happy if we threw away the concept of a "default desktop"
> and left that choice to people who do installs or downloading of live
> images.
[patch needed]
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:20:17 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> >> If the Debian maintainer uses the 3.0 format, the debian/ directory is
> >> magically removed from the upstream tarball anyway.
> > Right, but it's still annyoing when importing into a VCS.
> git import-orig --filter=debian/ might help
Le mercredi 12 septembre 2012 à 08:15 +, Sune Vuorela a écrit :
> On 2012-09-12, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I would be happy if we threw away the concept of a "default desktop"
> > and left that choice to people who do installs or downloading of live
> > images.
>
> yes please.
Seconded.
--
.'
On 12/09/2012 05:29, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:33:28 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
>> If the Debian maintainer uses the 3.0 format, the debian/ directory is
>> magically removed from the upstream tarball anyway.
>
> Right, but it's still annyoing when importing into a VCS.
On 2012-09-12, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Wookey wrote:
>
>> I'd be happy if xfce was the default.
>
> I would be happy if we threw away the concept of a "default desktop"
> and left that choice to people who do installs or downloading of live
> images.
yes please.
/Sune
40 matches
Mail list logo
