Hi,
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > That certainly seems a bit cleaner than assuming we know what the dpkg
> > database looks like it. However the manual page says 'Warning: this
> > command is deprecated, please switch to use --control-list and
> > --control-show instead.' Those
On 02.09.2012 23:54, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 23:17 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> [...]
>> But the OP system does not have old autofs5 package installed,
>> only the config files from it, and the maintscripts. Which is
>> exactly the problem.
>>
>> I want to ensure that if ol
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > # in autofs.postinst
> > rm -f /var/lib/dpkg/info/autofs5.postrm
> > (There may be a cleaner way to do this.)
>
> if postrm=$(dpkg-query -c autofs5 postrm 2>/dev/null); then
> rm -f "$postrm"
> fi
>
> Not sure about cleaner, but that's the su
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 11:26:34PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > if postrm=$(dpkg-query -c autofs5 postrm 2>/dev/null); then
> > rm -f "$postrm"
> > fi
> > Not sure about cleaner, but that's the supported dpkg interface.
> That certainly seems a bit cleaner than assuming we know what the dp
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 14:04 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 08:54:39PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 23:17 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > [...]
> > > But the OP system does not have old autofs5 package installed,
> > > only the config files from it,
Hello!
Ansgar Burchardt has written on Sunday, 2 September, at 22:04:
>"Andrej N. Gritsenko" writes:
>> Tell me, please, how I can achieve the inclusion of stable version of
>> libfm/pcmanfm into next debian release? BTW, next release of Ubuntu will
>> have 1.0 (or even 1.0.1) versions i
Hello!
Neil Williams has written on Sunday, 2 September, at 21:51:
>On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 22:33:14 +0300
>"Andrej N. Gritsenko" wrote:
>> You may hate me saying this but that's sad fact. If you think it's normal
>> then I'll shut up and let users ask you why their bugreports are never
>> fixed
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 08:54:39PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 23:17 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> [...]
> > But the OP system does not have old autofs5 package installed,
> > only the config files from it, and the maintscripts. Which is
> > exactly the problem.
> > I wa
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 22:33:14 +0300
"Andrej N. Gritsenko" wrote:
> >>The version libfm 0.1.17
> >> and pcmanfm 0.9.10 have few tens of critical bugs. Some of them are:
>
> >None of which appear to have been filed against the Debian packages. It
> >could be that no-one else has experienced such pro
"Andrej N. Gritsenko" writes:
> Tell me, please, how I can achieve the inclusion of stable version of
> libfm/pcmanfm into next debian release? BTW, next release of Ubuntu will
> have 1.0 (or even 1.0.1) versions included. Why debian should not?
There were a few mails about libfm 1.0 on lxde-
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 23:17 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[...]
> But the OP system does not have old autofs5 package installed,
> only the config files from it, and the maintscripts. Which is
> exactly the problem.
>
> I want to ensure that if old autofs5 is installed, installing
> new autofs sh
Hello!
Neil Williams has written on Sunday, 2 September, at 19:17:
>On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:30:31 +0300
>"Andrej N. Gritsenko" wrote:
>>The version libfm 0.1.17
>> and pcmanfm 0.9.10 have few tens of critical bugs. Some of them are:
>None of which appear to have been filed against the Debian
On 02.09.2012 21:21, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[]
>> Basically I want to ensure that if one installs package B to
>> a system with A installed, A should be upgraded to A' at the
>> same time. This works when upgrading A to A' (satisfying A'
>> dependency and installing B), but does not work when
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:30:31 +0300
"Andrej N. Gritsenko" wrote:
>The version libfm 0.1.17
> and pcmanfm 0.9.10 have few tens of critical bugs. Some of them are:
None of which appear to have been filed against the Debian packages. It
could be that no-one else has experienced such problems or the
p
Hello!
There is a problem with libfm and pcmanfm that are coming into next
stable debian release. Those are much outdated. The version libfm 0.1.17
and pcmanfm 0.9.10 have few tens of critical bugs. Some of them are:
- lock up of X server on drag & drop operation;
- frequent random crash
Hi Michael
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 02:18:56PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> It's been not once when I hit an issue described below.
> Now I hit it in one of the packages I maintain, but so
> far I can't figure out a good solution for it.
>
> The issue is with package renaming and handling of dp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: libshout-idjc
Version : 2.3.0
Upstream Author : Stephen Fairchild
* URL : http://idjc.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Description : broadcast streaming libra
On 09/02/12 20:43, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Hi!
> Just for the record (and I might be wrong with this information,
> because I don't have it from a "official" Gentoo source):
> I heard from a Gentoo dev that they will switch from OpenRC to
> systemd,
No.
> and find the possibility very funny that
❦ 2 septembre 2012 12:10 CEST, Thomas Goirand :
>>> Not only this. I want it on a RAID10 or RAID5 which goes faster than
>>> my / that is hosted in a slower RAID1.
>>
>> Okay, this is where you stopped making sense.
>>
>> RAID1 is *not* slower than RAID5. On the contrary. Think about it:
>
>
Hi!
Just for the record (and I might be wrong with this information,
because I don't have it from a "official" Gentoo source):
I heard from a Gentoo dev that they will switch from OpenRC to
systemd, and find the possibility very funny that Gentoo switches to
systemd from OpenRC and Debian switches
On 09/02/2012 03:57 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 02:29:20AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 08/31/2012 11:52 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
I guess I can understand that you want your /usr to be resizeable
Not only this. I want it on a RAID10 or RAID5 which goes faster th
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Matthew Woodcraft wrote:
>> Debian has supported booting from md RAID without using an initramfs for
>> a very long time.
> True but misleading. LILO supported it because it hard-coded the block list
> of the kernel and initrd at install time. GRUB1 never supported any RAI
Le samedi 01 septembre 2012 à 12:28 +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> It goes from a more manageable code (for some parts, the same
> feature as in systemd, but with a code that is 5 times smaller),
Code size is a compelling argument only with the same set of features.
Which is not the case.
> to
Hello.
It's been not once when I hit an issue described below.
Now I hit it in one of the packages I maintain, but so
far I can't figure out a good solution for it.
The issue is with package renaming and handling of dpkg
maintscripts.
Having in mind typical renaming scenario: package A has
been
On 09/02/2012 03:57 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 02:29:20AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 08/31/2012 11:52 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>>> I guess I can understand that you want your /usr to be resizeable
>>
>> Not only this. I want it on a RAID10 or RAID5 which goes fas
Le vendredi 31 août 2012 à 19:34 +0300, Serge a écrit :
> Yeah, one init system, one kernel, one libc, one distribution, one
> window manager, one OS. Looks like a windows-way. :)
There’s a huge difference between being able to switch between window
managers and to switch between init/kernel/libc.
Hi again,
On Sonntag, 2. September 2012, Svante Signell wrote:
> I am completely calm. And I do apologise, I am sorry for suggesting that
> somebody steps down from the project. That was wrong, admitted.
thanks! (a lot.)
> However, for the statement above, calling everything not in line with
>
On Sat, 2012-09-01 at 22:59 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Svante Signell wrote:
> >On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 19:34 +0300, Serge wrote:
> >> 2012/8/31 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >
> >> Linux is still not about choice? Then let's make it be about choice!
...
> >> > As for Debian not being universal, this
Hey Svante,
On Samstag, 1. September 2012, Svante Signell wrote:
> Maybe you, Josselin, should step down from working on Debian. It looks
> like your priorities are not in line with the Debian goals and the
> Debian contract any longer. Whatever the consequences will be.
Svante, maybe you should
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 02:29:20AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 08/31/2012 11:52 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > I guess I can understand that you want your /usr to be resizeable
>
> Not only this. I want it on a RAID10 or RAID5 which goes faster than
> my / that is hosted in a slower RAID1.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicholas Bamber
* Package name: license-reconcile
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Nicholas Bamber
* URL : https://github.com/periapt/license-reconcile
* License : Perl
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Reconci
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 09:28:11PM +0300, Serge wrote:
> 2012/8/30 Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >> How do you suppose it's possible to undo arbitrary network
> >> configuration done by arbitrary set of tools when there's no central
> >> place to hold such information (and can't possibly be)?
> >
> >
32 matches
Mail list logo
